Yet another example of the lack of ethics that describes so many
members of the Democrat party. Quote: "Some of the equipment was
shipped to the Awans’ homes, and many pieces of equipment could not
immediately be produced when investigators asked to see it, the senior
congressional official told TheDCNF. An allegedly lackadaisical approach
is especially troublesome because procurement violations are not the
only focus of the probe into the Awans. The Washington Post reported
that investigators found the crew accessed a server 5,400 times without authorization and transferred “massive” data off of the House network. Democrats are potentially letting Imran get away with
security breaches to keep the procurement issues from being looked
into, the senior official told TheDCNF.“We will never know the amount of
penetration these guys had unless [the offices] do the right thing and
come forward,” the official said. Collectively, the Awans and their
friend Rao Abbas ran IT for one in five House Democrats, and had access
to all their files.The Washington Post reported Sept. 17 that
Abid Awan’s attorney, James Bacon, responded to a question about why
orders were falsified to show amounts less than $500 by saying, “In a
fluid situation you do what you’re ordered to do.” Any missing
equipment, Bacon said, “disappeared after it was brought to the folks
who were demanding it. … It sounds to me like there’s a lot of
scapegoating here.” Christopher J. Gowen, one of Imran’s lawyers, added
in The Washington Post: “There’s nothing that Imran did that wasn’t
requested by one of his clients on House
staff.” http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/04/lawyer-for-it-aide-says-dem-congressmen-to-blame-for-falsified-spending-records/
I suspected something like this would be the case when it was
revealed that 30-40 elected House Democrats could end up being
implicated in the crimes. Here is another Democrat who has been indicted
for
corruption. https://www.teaparty.org/breaking-powerful-democrat-indicted-270815/
Quote: "Unfortunately, corruption is a reality on both sides of the
aisles. However, recently, it has been mostly members of the Democratic
party who have engaged in questionable behavior." Here is a bit of
insight into the behavior of Harvey
Weinstein. http://truedaily.news/2017/10/10/pervert-alert-hollywood-bigshot-confessing-to-lewd-acts-on-tape/
These items helps us understand why the Democrats and mainstream
media are so focused on deflecting their own indecent and unethical
criminality away from them onto Trump. They are hoping that these things
will not continue being exposed but that is highly unlikely.
It
would be nice if progressive liberals/Democrats of all races and
stripes would read and acknowledge the truth of the contents of this
piece. Quote: "The No. 1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming
from a very weak family structure. Children from fatherless homes are
likelier to drop out of high school, die by suicide, have behavioral
disorders, join gangs, commit crimes and end up in prison. They are also
likelier to live in poverty-stricken households. But is the weak black
family a legacy of slavery? In 1960, just 22 percent of black children
were raised in single-parent families. Fifty years later, more than 70
percent of black children were raised in single-parent families. Here’s
my question: Was the increase in single-parent black families after 1960
a legacy of slavery, or might it be a legacy of the welfare state
ushered in by the War on Poverty? According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia
of the Social Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children were born
to unwed mothers. Today about 75 percent of black children are born to
unwed mothers. Is that supposed to be a delayed response to the legacy
of slavery? The bottom line is that the black family was stronger the
first 100 years after slavery than during what will be the second 100
years. And, "The most damage done to black Americans is inflicted by
those politicians, civil rights leaders, and academics who assert that
every problem confronting blacks is a result of a legacy of slavery and
discrimination. That’s a vision that guarantees perpetuity for the
problems." https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/09/20/the-welfare-states-legacy/The expected massive amount of the Obama administration's dirty laundry is now spilling out and it is not a pretty sight. Quote: "Hillary Clinton’s campaign memoir rests on an astonishingly audacious lie: that the very FBI director who made her campaign possible by improperly sparing her from an indictment doomed it. A normal pol who had mishandled classified information as egregiously as Hillary would have felt eternal gratitude to Comey. Only an entitled ingrate like Hillary would have the gall to cast her savior as the chief thorn in her side. Nor does Hillary acknowledge another in-kind contribution to her campaign from Comey: his willingness to serve as a cog in Obama’s campaign of political espionage against Trump. Obama’s team of Hillary partisans, which included among others John Brennan, Susan Rice, and Loretta Lynch, wanted Comey to snoop on Trumpworld and he duly did. It was reported this week that the FBI had until as recently as earlier this year been intercepting the communications of Paul Manafort, one of Trump’s campaign chairmen. This means that Comey, contrary to his lawyerly denial of Trump’s wiretapping claim, had the means to eavesdrop on any communications between Manafort and Trump." And, "Another recent revelation is that Susan Rice, one of Hillary’s most fervent supporters, spied on a post-election meeting between a prince from the United Arab Emirates and Trump aides. The media shrugged at the revelation, as if such snooping falls within the bounds of a blameless norm. An even slightly curious press, were it not in the tank for the Dems, would be agog at the news that one administration was spying on an incoming administration and demand an accounting of such an abuse of power. Had the George Bush administration, out of post-election spite, spied on pre-inauguration meetings between Obama’s people and officials from a Middle Eastern country, the press would still be talking about it as a historic abuse of power. But in Rice’s case, they hastily inform their audience that “such unmaskings are perfectly legal.” And, "The media’s customary double standard for Democrats, combined with its treatment of Trump as a singularly monstrous Republican candidate (and then incoming president), served as a safety net beneath such high-wire political espionage. Rice knew that even if she fell in her attempt to nail Trump the media would catch her." And, "The scandal at the center of the 2016 election was not that Trump colluded with Russians to win but that the media and the Obama administration colluded with Hillary to defeat him. The loudest cries of “foreign influence over the election” came from Hillary partisans who sought it, whether it was John Brennan running off to England and Estonia to collect dirt on Trump from their spies or deep-state clowns at the FBI who wanted to turn Christopher Steele into an asset. The villain, in this sorry fable, turned out to be the victim." https://spectator.org/all-of-obamas-wiretappers/?
This is a logical follow-on to the previous item. It too includes lessons all of us need to pay attention to. Quote: "Yesterday’s post could have been much longer, as there are many angles to the modern American skins game. In the fullness of time, there will be many books written on the subject or at least using it as a launching pad in analyzing the late America collapse. One point of entry is belief. People are believing machines. They will organize themselves around a set of beliefs, even if those beliefs are insane. That is what we are seeing in modern America. Christianity has faded, so something new filled the void. That something new is a grab bag of ideas borrowed from Cultural Marxism, hung like ornaments on the burnt out husk that is Christian universalism. That is modern Progressivism. Cultural Marxism, by itself, has never made much sense, but inflated with the zeal of universalism, it is a very powerful force in modern society. It certainly does not make a lot of sense and it does not offer anything as pleasing as an afterlife, but for the true believer, it fills the void that Christianity once filled. That’s most obvious when it comes to race. Progressives are endlessly chanting that race is not real. They are also endlessly chanting that racism is the most dangerous evil spirit in their hierarchy of evil. Most of what is going on today is based in their belief that whites are racists, simply because whites have acted to benefit whites. The trouble for Progs, though, is that this contradicts their support for non-whites. Everywhere you turn, non-whites are out flying their team’s flag and cheering for their side against the honky." And, "The racism Progressives fear, the dark force they are sure lurks in the heart of white men, is their own creation. American Progressives cannot stop making war on the honky so it is inevitable that the honky will make war back." https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/09/20/cheering-for-my-team/
This piece provides cogent insights relevant to current events. Quote: "The social justice cultism of leftists, growing ever more violent and illogical, is meant to push conservatives not just into the arms of the Trump White House, but it is also meant to push us towards a more totalitarian mindset. The more aggressive the left becomes, the more inclined the right will be to use government as a weapon to pulverize them with an iron fist. This is exactly what globalists want, for once conservatives abandon our Constitutional principles in the name of defeating the left, we will have become the monster we have always sought to defend against. We will have lost the long game and the globalists will have us exactly where they want us. Communism and fascism are two sides of the same coin. Both ideologies were originally developed and funded by international banks and conglomerates in the early 20th century. For undeniable evidence of this I recommend reading works of Antony Sutton, including Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution, as well as Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler. Communism is a totalitarian/collectivist model based on the fraudulent premise that the strongest and most successful in a society must be diminished or erased in order to elevate the weak and unsuccessful. All based on the assumption that the strong must have risen to their position through oppression and exploitation. Through this erasure they hope to create “equality.” Fascism is a totalitarian/collectivist model based on the fraudulent premise that the weak and unsuccessful in a society must be diminished or erased because they are a parasitic drain on the strong. Both rely heavily on the power of government, the blind servitude of the majority and the use of terror to achieve their goals. Neither of these systems is compatible with conservative philosophy and both of them act as a catalyst for greater centralization and less freedom, which the globalists benefit greatly from. In fact, if you believe in the force of big government and the collectivist mindset then you cannot call yourself a conservative. The two worldviews are mutually exclusive." https://boblivingstonletter.com/alerts/globalists-use-insane-leftists-provocateurs-push-conservatives-towards-totalitarianism/
A video well worth watching. http://libertyvideonews.com/ben-shapiro-talks-capitalism-and-free-speech-to-young-americans/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment