Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Climate Science 2

This item discusses an interesting proposal to oust the US from the UN's Climate Change activities.  It just proves the idiocy of the people within the UN and who support so many of the UN's dishonest, unjust, immoral and unethical actions.  Quote: "The U.S. pays 22% of the UN budget and 20% of the UN climate process."   Ask yourself if the idiots making this proposal will pick up the tab.  Of course not because the UN's climate program is a poorly disguised program (even admitted to by the former head of the climate change program) to transfer money from rich countries to poor countries run by communists, socialists and dictators. The purpose "of course" of the money transfer is to help those countries deal with the expected climate change problems they face.  But, I will give you three guesses as to who's pocket the money would end up in.
This item suggests that scientists are tinkering with an idea to cool down the supervolcano underneath Yellowstone National Park with the goal of avoiding it exploding and creating a nuclear winter on earth.  Their idea is however fraught with dangers that could have devastating consequences.  Read here to get details.    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/08/20/nasa-unveils-plan-to-stop-yellowstone-supervolcano-eruption-theres-just-one-catch/ 
This is a lesson we all need to learn.  Experts are not always right.  This item provides a cautionary bit of advice.  Quote: "I’ll summarize by reminding readers that I am not a scientist and I don’t have the tools to evaluate the credibility of climate scientists. If you think you do have that ability as a non-scientist, my guess is that you are younger than me or you have less experience of the type I described above.  When I present this sort of framing to climate change believers, they generally retreat to Pascal’s Wager, which says in this case that we should treat any risk of catastrophe as if it is likely, so we aggressively address the risk and eliminate it. That makes sense in a world where resources are not constrained. But our world is the opposite. Everything we do is at the expense of something else we wanted to do. And I am aware of no economic model that considers the opportunity cost of spending a trillion dollars for perhaps a half-degree temperature improvement.  Climate change isn’t our only mortal threat. We have pandemics, terrorism, nuclear war, the singularity, asteroids, and probably a dozen more threats I don’t even know. If we could eliminate all of those threats and have money left over, I say let’s do it. But if resources are limited (and they are), I need a strong argument to put a trillion dollars into any one of the risks."     https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/09/11/when-to-trust-the-experts-climate-and-otherwise/    Wise words indeed. 
This founder of the weather channel speaks truth to foolish global warmest claims.  http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/weather-channel-founder-so-put-me-to-death-for-climate-denial/  It is funny how CNN know it all's who have no clue like to try to outsmart a real scientist.  It would be funny if not true.  https://conservativetribune.com/weather-channel-founder-facts/    More trouble for Gore's most recent efforts to dupe people with his unscientific climate change nonsense.   http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/nasa-senior-scientist-crushes-gores-new-climate-change-book/ 
Global warmests under Obama were in the business of fabricating data to support their political agenda.  It is a good thing Trump dramatically cut their budget.  They wasted far too much money on making up stuff to justify their existences.  http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/07/exclusive-researcher-claims-to-have-evidence-one-of-epas-most-successful-clean-air-rules-is-based-on-fabricated-data/ 
Positions built on false or flawed data cannot long stand.  http://mailchi.mp/cfact/scientists-concede-climate-models-wrong?
This item provides another example of why we should always challenge scientific conclusions reached by leftist leaning organizations.  They have a tendency to lie, fabricate data and engage in unscientific research.    http://www.libertyheadlines.com/lying-enviro-groups-didnt-test-air-emissions-report/?
This piece is a bit confusing in content.  It blames too much sea ice has caused the penguin population to experience loss of babies as a result.  Yet they say climate change (code word for global warming) is a problem needing to be addressed.  Quote: "Thousands of dead chicks and unhatched eggs were found across the region called Adélie Land.  “The Mertz glacier impact on the region sets the scene in 2010 and when unusual meteorological events, driven by large climatic variations, hit in some years this leads to massive failures,” Ropert-Coudert told the Guardian. “In other words, there may still be years when the breeding will be OK, or even good for this colony, but the scene is set for massive impacts to hit on a more or less regular basis.” The link between climate change and the sea-ice extent around Antarctica is not very clear. Sea ice has been increasing in recent years, which could be attributed to a rise in the amount of freshwater in the ocean around the continent caused by climate change. However, over the long term, climate change is expected to cause the sea ice to shrink dramatically."  https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/15/penguins-die-due-to-too-much-ice-in-antarctica/
Irony of ironies.  Study finds that the globe is cooler now than when Gore claimed it was getting warmer.    http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/08/12/study-earth-cooler-now-than-when-al-gore-won-nobel-peace-prize-for-global-warming-work/   The more he opens his mouth the worse he looks.  He has absolutely no credibility whatever.    http://conservativetribune.com/2-7-million-al-gore/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTConservativeBrief&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=2017-08-18  
This item is for those who wish to review how wrong Gore is in his efforts to warn us about climate calamity.  A study has found that he helps climate change critics make their case rather than the case he hawks.  There is also a detailed critique of his latest movie.  This item is extensive and consumes lots of time.    http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/08/23/climate-depot-special-report-fact-checking-of-al-gores-an-inconvenient-sequel/?   More analysis of Gore's latest movie.   http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/24/delingpole-al-gores-an-inconvenient-sequel-fact-checked/  
https://fee.org/articles/how-the-debate-on-climate-change-is-cooling-down/?
Tinkering with data is not science.  It is dishonest at best and fraud at worse.  Quote: ""Homogenization" is the process that allows climate scientists to correct for anomalies in raw temperature data. How there can be anomalies in raw data is beyond me.
This latest scandal is even more serious, one in which the BOM has been forced to admit that incorrect temperatures were logged. Naturally, the agency is blaming faulty equipment but Marhosasy is pushing back. According to the Daily Caller she told reporters that the BOM's claims of faulty equipment "are nearly impossible to believe given that there are screen shots that show the very low temperatures before being 'quality assured' out."  http://www.dailywire.com/news/19211/global-warming-hoax-exposed-australia-weather-john-nolte?  
Bill  Nye should shut up and go away.  He is an uninformed pseudo scientist and should recognize that he is an embarrassment to his causes.  Yet again he had to be corrected by a real expert for his inaccurate accounting of a climate science phenomena. https://www.westernjournalism.com/bill-nye-blames-hurricanes-climate-change-real-scientist-proves-wrong/?
Thought police with dubious evidence and plenty of unethical practices wish to charge people who do not believe their fake climate change claims should be put in jail.  How is that for tolerance and honest debate?   http://www.libertyheadlines.com/vice-editor-climate-change-denial-crime/  
About all that seismic activity going on at Yellowstone.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4779550/See-ground-deformed-Yellowstone-volcano.html 
This Muslim Democrat is someone who is not to be trusted with any responsibility for anything.  His very words prove his irresponsibility.  http://www.libertyheadlines.com/democratic-party-leader-trump-worse-kim-jong-un/? 
Predictions have been made but none have come true.  What does that tell us?    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/08/15/can-someone-show-us-a-climate-prediction-that-has-ever-come-true/
George Burns

No comments: