Climate Science 1

Yellowstone super volcano update.  https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/12/threat-of-devastating-supervolcano-eruption-at-yellowstone-is-greater-than-previously-thought/  This thing could cause a calamity.    http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/hurricanes-floods-fires-and-now-a-supervolcano-threatens-u-s/

This item has nothing to do with climate science.  It has to do with why and how our universe even exists.  This is a scientific puzzle being wrestled with by top scientists and they have no idea what the answer is.  This item explains.    http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/scientists-baffled-universe-shouldnt-exist/

This world class scientist debunks climate science and scientists who claim CO2 is a poison gas. Quote: " Everything you’ve been told about global warming, climate change and carbon dioxide by the mainstream media — and mainstream “science” — is an outright lie. Far from being a dangerous poison, carbon dioxide is a miraculous life-giving nutrient that plants need to thrive. Rising carbon dioxide is actually helping “green” the planet, as any legitimate science already knows. Without CO2 in the atmosphere, nearly all life on the planet would collapse, including both human life and plant life."     https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-30-all-the-biggest-lies-about-climate-change-and-global-warming-debunked-in-one-astonishing-interview.html

This piece may cause some of us to question the government's party line when telling us what happen in certain events.  They argue that the science supports them.  This piece looks at an example that may cause a question or two to arise from one the government's conclusions with this one incident.  Quote: "As an object lesson, the Oklahoma Bombing was: “You see what happens when crazy people are allowed to own guns and oppose the government? Stop listening to anti-government rhetoric. It’s horribly dangerous. We, the government, are here to protect you. Come home to us. Have faith in us. We’ll punish the offenders. We’ll make America safe again. Let’s all come together and oppose these maniacs who want to destroy our way of life…”  The lesson worked.  Many scared Americans signed on to Clinton’s agenda.  And fake FBI science was used to bolster that agenda.  Even when exposed as fake by mainstream press outlets—however briefly, with no determined follow-up—the federal brainwashing held. The myth was stronger than reality.  If the federal government can egregiously lie about an event as huge as the Oklahoma Bombing, using fake science as a cover—what wouldn’t they lie about?"    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/08/21/fake-evidence-used-in-the-oklahoma-bombing/    My experience over the years is that we should always question what the government tells us about events that would make it look bad, foolish or incompetent.

This article lays out the facts that climate alarmist will not like, agree with or ignore.  The reasons will appear in the piece.  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/11/sixty_nails_in_climate_alarmisms_coffin.html

This leftist governor and off his rocker.  He thinks that reason must be thrown out of the window and be replaced with leftist propaganda.  Science is what the propagandist say it is.  To heck with the facts.  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/11/moonbeam_jerry_brown_calls_for_brainwashing_getting_ever_cultier.html

Former EPA scientist calls for Trump to clean up the fake science mess that is so rampant across government, academia and corporate entities. Quote: "In a recent article published on The Daily Caller, columnist David Lewis, Research Director at the Focus For Health Foundation and a former EPA scientist, called on President Trump to put an end to the “fake science” routinely being perpetuated by leftists and radical environmentalists alike. “Trump can eliminate federal funding of data fabrication,” Lewis wrote. “It just takes putting accomplished scientists in charge, who understand both science and the federal bureaucracy from top to bottom and will do whatever is necessary.”"    https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-24-former-epa-scientist-calls-on-trump-to-end-the-fake-science-bureaucracy-that-has-taken-over-the-federal-government.html 

This is both scientifically sound and common sense.   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/11/martin-armstrong/660444-2/

Does evidence mean anything to unethical scientists anymore?  This is a truly sad tale.     http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/11/tell_a_big_lie_and_keep_repeating_it.html

Radical leftist climate change hokus pokus is being debunked left and right.  Quote: "According to an outspoken university biologist and author, at least 400 scientific papers have been written this year alone that raise serious doubts regarding the theory that recent changes in the Earth’s climate are primarily caused by rising carbon dioxide emissions. Writing for his blog, NoTricksZone, Brown University biology professor Kenneth R. Miller explained that the papers both question the climate change “consensus” touted by left-wing politicians and mainstream media — and also make it clear “that there are significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes.” In other words, they prove that “(c)limate science is not settled,” no matter how much liberals claim otherwise. For instance, the studies show that what some perceive as bizarre temperatures, sea levels and weather patterns “are neither unusual nor unprecedented,” Miller explained. “Many regions of the Earth are cooler now than they have been for most of the last 10,000 years,” he wrote."   https://conservativetribune.com/scientific-papers-global-warming/?    More:  http://teapartyjournal.com/growing-scientific-research-proving-global-warming-a-myth/

I have called the so called Science Guy, Bill Nye, a fraud a number of times.  This item seems to confirm that as fact.  You be the judge.   http://www.dailywire.com/news/23377/bill-nye-not-so-science-guy-gets-slammed-and-its-hank-berrien?utm_medium=email&utm_content=110917-news&utm_campaign=position7

No matter how much evidence emerges the global warming advocates continue to say humans a responsible for global warming.  Likewise their intelligence is challenged when considering the cost of their foolish plans to solve what is not likely to have a remote chance of accomplishing their objectives which are likewise challengeable. This short item helps us understand the dilemma.   http://americanactionnews.com/articles/the-jaw-dropping-cost-of-stopping-global-warming  Spending that kind of money on a definite uncertainty is a fools errand.  Helping people solve hunger, homelessness, poverty and diseases is a more realistic use of such funds.

Quote: "Arturo Casadevall and Ferric Fang, two academic microbiologists with no special knowledge of climate, recently used their article in the Hill to commit the repellent but now commonplace hate-crime of describing researchers skeptical of the sillier exaggerations of the climate-change establishment as “denialists.” This disfiguring hate-word, calculated to invite an invidious comparison between climate skeptics and those who say the Nazis did not murder six million Jews, is not fit to be uttered by any serious academic. Here, as always, its misuse by intellectual pygmies indicated more than a little nervousness on the part of the establishment, for the world continues to warm at a rate well below what was originally predicted, and, as it turns out, there is a good explanation for the discrepancy."  And, "The two microbiologists have missed the point entirely. They talk of “virtually unanimous consensus” that Earth is facing a period of anthropogenic climate change. Yet the largest sample of academic papers on climate ever studied — an impressive 11,944 papers over the 21 years 1991–2011 — showed only 0.3 percent “consensus” explicitly supporting the proposition recent global warming was mostly manmade. The question whether the small warming that is to be expected will prove dangerous was not even asked; the “consensus” on that question is even smaller."   https://spectator.org/dont-call-climate-skeptics-deniers-call-us-correct/

Hopefully this is the beginning of a shift away from climate change alarmism. Quote: "A supposedly breathtaking, bombshell report published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week has taken the scientific community by storm. At long last, the global warming alarmists of the world are ready to admit what the skeptics have been saying for years: That the official climate models that predict global catastrophe within just a few years thanks to carbon emissions…well, they’re just a teensy bit off. So off, in fact, that climate scientists are now being forced to admit that the Great Emergency we were all facing just a few days ago is in fact not that big a deal."  And, "In other words, the official models used by the IPCC have us budgeting for a much smaller amount of CO2 emissions than we actually have to expend. This gives nations around the world much more leeway when it comes to imposing regulations on the industrialized sector. Good news if you’re a capitalist.  Bad news if you’ve been using the hoax of man-made climate change to eradicate Big Oil, Big Coal, and the rest of the fossil fuel industry."    http://www.conservativefreepress.com/politics/mainstream-scientists-finally-admit-warming-predictions-wrong/