This
item illustrates well the rank hypocrisy of Democrats and their
irrational hype about gun control. Quote: "According to the statistics,
nearly five times more people died in Chicago this year than in the Las
Vegas shooting. Yet the mainstream media continually turns a blind eye
to the dead and fails to hold Democrat politicians like Mayor Rahm
Emanuel accountable for the city’s chaotic condition. The reason is,
Chicago doesn’t fit the narrative the left-leaning press wants to spin.
Chicago saw 32 people shot (four of them fatally) last weekend. Do only
mass shootings get intense media scrutiny? That’s because, unlike the
Las Vegas shooting, most of the gun violence in Chicago is crime and
gang-related–and the people who commit these crimes use illegal weapons.
According to the Washington Post, only one-in-five gun crimes are
committed by the legal owner of the firearm. In the vast majority of
cases, criminals use stolen or illegally-obtained weapons. This makes
sense. After all, registered guns can be tracked down, and the last
thing criminals want is to leave a trail leading back to them. Also,
many violent criminals are repeat offenders. Because laws often keep
people with a criminal record from obtaining firearms, felons’ only
recourse is to get an illegal gun. Adding more restrictive gun laws to
the books would not stop the mass deaths happening daily in cities like
Chicago. As Second Amendment advocates repeatedly stress, gun laws only
restrict law-abiding Americans–while empowering criminals."
https://www.teaparty.org/breaking-32-shot-4-dead-not-las-vegas-270213/
This has been covered before in previous items but here it is again.
The places with the most crimes committed with guns are Democrat
strongholds having the toughest gun control laws. If their solution
were implemented across the country think of what the consequences would
be. Again: foolishness begets foolishness and that is a
trait engrained in leftist/progressive/Democrat dogma.
Before
we leave the subject of the Los Vegas shooting, it is a good idea to
consider the analysis contained in this piece. Quote: "Lone shooter?
Really? And this is supposed to be more than a convenient fantasy? Yesterday,
I did a brief analysis of the number of people killed and wounded at
the Vegas Concert (573) in roughly four and half minutes, which is the
police estimate of the duration of the attack. I mistakenly reversed
figures. The correct conclusion would be: the lone shooter killed or
wounded 2.1 persons per second. It is HIGHLY doubtful Paddock could
have done that. His distance from the concert, his lack of professional
skill, his state of mind, among other factors, rule against it. Any
competent and honest law-enforcement analyst would see a huge red flag
right away. But of course, multiple shooters destroys the official
narrative and opens the door to an investigation that could expose, for
example, an intentional false flag operation." And, "I fully understand
that the estimates of 573 killed and wounded, and the police statement
that all the shooting took place in four and half minutes, may be off.
These figures may not be precise. Nevertheless, they are a good and
proper starting point. And even allowing for later adjustments, the
evidence for multiple shooters and against a lone amateur like Paddock
is stunning. So why won’t law-enforcement take notice? Because, in
certain cases with great consequences, the overall agenda and the
direction of an investigation are set from offices far higher than the
positions of the actual detectives and agents on the scene. “This is
what we want to know. Only this. Everything else is off limits.”
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/10/03/more-than-one-vegas-shooter-the-evidence-builds/
Hopefully a full investigation will reveal the entirety of the facts.
If
you don't think the socialist Democrats are serious about destroying
the Second Amendment this item will dispel that thought. This is what
all tyrannical governments do. Disarm citizens so they cannot resist a
government run by socialists, fascists, dictators and communists who
do have guns.
http://www.libertyheadlines.com/leftists-demand-america-ban-guns/?
Is this possible??? https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/04/let-me-get-this-straight-2/
Sane
people in the UK are beginning to understand what
our liberal/progressives can't seem to figure out. Quote: "After
suffering through five terrorist attacks in 2017, there appears to
finally be growing sentiment in the UK to begin arming more police
officers with firearms. It turns out that the notorious politeness of
the British “Bobbies” is not a sufficient response to groups of
machete-wielding terrorists who are ready to die while taking out as
many unarmed civilians as possible. We’ll have to wait and see whether
that growing sentiment, however, turns into action. London’s unarmed
police are a concept that dates back almost 200 years and it has worked
for the Brits for the most part, until now. The Metropolitan Police
Service was founded in 1829 on the idea of “policing by consent” instead
of by force. Today less than one in ten officers in London carry a
firearm on duty. A cop has to receive training in London to become an
Authorized Firearms Officer and historically, very few have done so.
Most police in Britain are armed with pepper spray or mace, a set of
handcuffs, a baton and occasionally a Taser."
http://americangunnews.com/u-k-rethinking-their-anti-gun-policy-for-cops-after-terror-attacks/
Sorry to
share this but it proves what most sane people already know. She
is admired by those on the political left but the true is this woman is a
hateful racist.
http://americanactionnews.com/articles/michelle-obama-people-don-t-like-politics-because-gop-is-all-men-all-white
People who say things like this offer proof that they are not who they
pretend to be. She and people like her are the real problem our country
is facing. Hate begets hate.
This item discusses the proposition that ongoing tax policy changes will make a difference, or will they? Quote: "I
would hazard a guess that an increasing number of tax donkeys are
considering dropping out as a means of increasing their happiness and
satisfaction with life.Since
federal income taxes are in the spotlight, let’s ask a question that
rarely (if ever) makes it into the public discussion: what if the tax donkeys who pay most of the tax rebel?
There are several likely reasons why this question rarely arises."
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/03/what-if-the-tax-donkeys-rebel/
The
Democrats are good at saying Trump is a failure when facts prove
otherwise. Then again as is well known Democrats are not very good when
dealing with facts. Quote: "President Donald Trump hasn’t appeared to
be all that focused on his campaign promise of cracking down on illegal
immigration, complete with a new border wall, but the facts don’t lie.
While the media was busy clutching their proverbial pearls over the
President’s comments regarding the National Football League, the
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were hard at work rustling up
illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities. ICE officials confirmed that
498 criminal aliens were detained by law enforcement in the course of a
four-day long sting that targeted 10 cities around the nation."
http://rightwingnews.com/illegal-immigration-2/national-sanctuary-sting-ends-nearly-500-illegal-aliens-arrested/
This
is an interesting take on the Trump/Russia investigation led by Special
Prosecutor Mueller. Quote: "That may be what’s really going on with
the special prosecutor. The phony Russia scandal provided an excuse to
bring in a political pro like Mueller to clean up the mess left by Comey
and the Obama Administration. The FBI is not supposed to be spying on
Americans without a warrant and they are really not supposed to be
listening in on politicians. Someone signed off on bugging Trump Tower,
during and after the presidential election. Who knows what other
shenanigans have been going on. The most likely answer for why a special
prosecutor was appointed is that it was an easy way to get the whole
thing out of the White House. Since the story is bogus and Mueller
surely knows it is bogus, it will be a nice patronage program for a year
or two and then the whole thing goes away. The second most likely
answer is that Mueller’s job is to clean up the mess left by Comey and
protect the reputation of the FBI, maybe even some other intelligence
agencies. That way, no one gets hurt the problems are quietly fixed.
What this is not. is an investigation about Russia meddling in the
election.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/02/the-fbis-russia-shield/
No comments:
Post a Comment