At What Point Do We Stop Tolerating Bernie Sanders?

Scott McKay's article critiques the tolerance shown towards U. S. Senator Bernie Sanders and the implications of his political ideology on the American political landscape. The author argues that while society preaches tolerance, there are limits to what should be tolerated in the realm of politics, particularly concerning ideologies that have historically led to oppression and violence.

1. The Concept of Tolerance:

• Society values tolerance, often applying it broadly without considering its implications.

• Tolerance of certain behaviors or ideologies can lead to negative consequences, akin to failing to maintain standards in personal life.

2. Standards in Society:

• Establishing personal standards, such as not tolerating crime or harmful behaviors, leads to improved living conditions.

• A distinction must be made between tolerating diversity in culture and tolerating harmful ideologies.

3. Envy and Ideology:

• Envy is highlighted as a harmful trait and is linked to radical ideologies, including Marxism.

• The author discusses the historical rise of capitalism and its relationship to human prosperity, contrasting it with collectivist ideologies that enforce equality by undermining success.

4. Critique of Bernie Sanders:

• Sanders is described as a political figure who promotes a revolutionary vision while simultaneously detracting from democratic principles.

• His political stance and influence are linked to a broader trend of violence within the Democratic Party.

5. Issues with Democratic Party Dynamics:

• The Democratic Party, influenced heavily by Sanders’ ideologies, faces a lack of public respect and is criticized for accepting his views.

• McKay questions why Sanders, despite not being a formal member of the Democratic Party, holds significant committee positions in the Senate.

6. Consequences of Tolerance:

• The article questions the consequences of continuing to tolerate political figures promoting destructive ideologies.

• McKay emphasizes the dangers of complacency in allowing individuals with radical views to hold influential positions.

In summary, Scott McKay calls for a reassessment of what is acceptable in politics, particularly regarding the influence of figures like Bernie Sanders. The article argues that tolerating harmful ideologies undermines democratic values and poses a threat to societal stability. There is a clear implication that individuals should actively reject such ideologies to maintain the standards necessary for a healthy political environment. 

https://spectator.org/at-what-point-do-we-stop-tolerating-bernie-sanders/