We Told You So: EPA Was Wrong About CO2 From the Start

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently revised its position on carbon dioxide (CO2), indicating a shift away from the narrative that has deemed it an existential threat. This change raises important questions about climate policy, regulations, and the economic implications for taxpayers and businesses.

1. Revised EPA Stance:

• The EPA has repealed its previous "endangerment finding," which classified CO2 as a significant environmental threat.

• This admission suggests that the claims about CO2’s dangers were politically motivated rather than scientifically sound.

2. Economic Impact of the Reversal:

• The repeal could eliminate over a trillion dollars in compliance costs associated with regulations on CO2 emissions.

• Families may see savings, particularly in the cost of vehicles and energy bills.

3. CO2's Role in the Environment:

• CO2 constitutes about 0.04% of the Earth's atmosphere and is essential for plant life.

• Historically, life has thrived during periods when CO2 levels were higher than today.

4. Critique of Regulatory Approaches:

• The article criticizes the push for carbon capture and sequestration projects, arguing they create new risks while failing to address actual problems.

• These projects involve compressing CO2 into concentrated forms and storing it underground, raising safety concerns.

5. Political and Economic Accountability:

• The author emphasizes the need for transparency regarding who bears the costs of these projects, questioning the necessity and safety of mandated carbon reduction technologies.

• He poses critical questions to energy companies about their motivations and the financial burdens placed on taxpayers.

6. Climate Policy and Global Context:

• While the U. S. is pressured to reduce its emissions, other countries, particularly China, continue to increase coal production, diluting efforts to address global climate change.

7. Call for Policy Change:

• The article advocates for an overhaul of current climate narratives, prioritizing affordable energy and genuine environmental protection over fear-based rhetoric and government subsidies.

The EPA's repeal of the endangerment finding marks a potential turning point in climate policy, where the need for honest discussions about CO2 and its role is paramount. It challenges previous assumptions that CO2 is harmful and opens avenues for a more balanced approach to energy and environmental management. The author calls for an end to corporate welfare in climate policy and urges for practical solutions that protect both the environment and public finances. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/02/14/we-told-you-so-epa-was-wrong-about-co2-from-the-start/