On February 13, 2026, the Trump administration announced the repeal of a significant climate regulation known as the Endangerment Finding, which had been established during the Obama presidency. This decision, framed as a major deregulatory action by President Trump, is causing strong backlash among Democrats and climate activists who are concerned about its potential environmental impact.
1. Trump's Announcement:
• President Donald Trump described the repeal as the “largest deregulatory action in American history,” claiming it would reduce costs for consumers, particularly with new vehicles.
2. Democratic Response:
• Several Democratic leaders criticized the repeal, suggesting it would lead to increased pollution and harm public health. Former President Barack Obama stated that the lack of EPA regulation on greenhouse gases would make the country “less safe” and hinder efforts to combat climate change.
• Prominent figures, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Vice President Al Gore, voiced strong opposition on social media, calling the action “lawless” and claiming it serves the fossil fuel industry rather than public health.
3. Court Challenges:
• Gov. Newsom announced California's intention to legally challenge the repeal, emphasizing the state's commitment to fighting against changes detrimental to environmental protections.
4. Dismantling Clean Vehicle Mandates:
• The repeal includes the elimination of a de facto national electric vehicle (EV) mandate, previously upheld by the Endangerment Finding. This decision followed congressional resolutions aimed at deregulating various environmental standards.
5. Criticism of Scientific Ignorance:
• Critics assert that the Trump administration is ignoring established scientific research linking climate change to public health issues. The dismissal of the Endangerment Finding is seen by many as a politically motivated action that prioritizes corporate interests over public welfare.
6. Allegations of Corruption:
• Some Democratic leaders accused the Trump administration of corruption, suggesting that the decision benefits wealthy donors and corporations at the expense of public health and the environment. They emphasized the economic and moral implications of allowing increased pollution.
7. Financial Implications:
• The Trump EPA estimated that repealing the Endangerment Finding could save taxpayers over $1 trillion, a claim that has been met with skepticism regarding the accuracy and motivations behind the data presented.
The repeal of the Endangerment Finding marks a significant shift in U. S. environmental policy under the Trump administration, prompting serious concerns from Democrats and environmental advocates. The potential consequences of increased pollution and health risks are critical issues that have fueled backlash and planned legal action from various states, notably California. The repeal is characterized by competing narratives regarding the balance between economic benefits and environmental responsibility.
https://dailycaller.com/2026/02/13/obama-allies-melt-down-trump-zeldin-endangerment-finding-al-gore/
No comments:
Post a Comment