Maybe you should speak with Mrs Latypova and Mr Barnes and Dr Mike Yeadon first, because deciding to go after Pfizer using the adulteration of vaccine and non-disclosure to FDA method, obviously based on good manufacturing practices is very likely to be futile... So you're likely to just waste your time and effort when you should be focusing on going after the "This is a bioweapon" approach of Dr David Martin and Mrs Kingston.
This is because Mrs Latypova and Mrs Watt have already disclosed very very clearly that good manufacturing practices legal framework doesn't apply in the case of COVID vaccines, those were "Procured" via Other transactions authority law exemption / framework of US DoD, which employs as military contractors different suppliers including Pfizer.
So under OTA they don't have to follow good manufacturing practices.
Mr Barnes already failed to procecute Pfizer for defrauding the government precisely because of OTA, but also because the contracts were for a demo, not a final prduct.
So it is beyond me how they'll succeed now with adulteration fraud to FDA, when their focus should be what Dr David Martin has been shouting for at least a year now, and Mrs Karen Kingston.
Dr Martin has proposed that the line of legal attack should be "This is a bioweapon" and thus different set of laws apply in that aspect, not good manufacturing practices nor OTA above.
Maybe you could speak with Dr David Martin + absolutely with Mrs Latypova + Mrs Watt + Dr Mike Yeadon, to coordinate your legal efforts and with the right approach that will not fail, otherwise there's great delays with the legal path until we realize we've reached another dead-end, while more people die and/or not receive compensation assistance for their huge medical bills.
No comments:
Post a Comment