Climate Data Refutes Crisis Narrative

 Earlier this month in Orange County, California, at an event attended by water industry executives, a debate between two climate experts offered a revealing look into the tactics and the mentality of the climate alarmists, as well as the beleaguered integrity of climatologists still willing to challenge the narrative.

Back in 2019, back when President Trump's regulatory reforms had the climate industrial complex fearing for its life, Dr. Curry published an expose of what she dubbed "Consensus enforcement." In it, she described how the world's most prestigious climate journals were yielding to pressure - mostly supported by their own editorial management - to refuse to publish anything by climate "Contrarians."

Attempting to compile information on climate that doesn't support a crisis narrative is demonstrably challenging, as anyone attempting to use a mainstream search engine will quickly attest.

One of the saddest examples of suppression is the reluctance of conservative editors to challenge the scientific arguments used to support the climate crisis narrative.

"We'll pass on this, but thanks for showing it in. On the question of climate change, there's no editorial line, but I tend to be uneasy about publishing anything directly on the science. Much more interesting to me is how climate policy is being abused and how much of it makes no sense even by its own lights."

Is Rob Bonta a scientist? Gavin Newsom? Joe Biden? Al Gore? Greta Thunberg? How many of the in-house editors at the Los Angeles Times are scientists, much less climate scientists? But none of these people have any reluctance to hector us with their opinions, often not even derived from those climate scientists who are part of the "Consensus," but lifted from other pundits who got their material directly from press releases that featured cherry picked "Impactful" nuggets taken from abstracts and summaries which in turn were exaggerations and misrepresentations of studies that even in their totality were paid for, inherently biased exercises.

If being a scientist is not a requirement for being a climate alarmist, it should not be a requirement for anyone skeptical of climate alarmism.

https://amgreatness.com/2023/10/25/climate-data-refutes-crisis-narrative/