Keeping You Informed

 Quote: "Do the people who rushed to get the COVID shot have buyer's remorse? There are many troubling aspects to the COVID vaccines and the growing mandates for them.  Here I'd like to focus on one that is rarely discussed.

To begin with, when these unapproved vaccines were first made available to the public on an emergency basis, many people rushed headlong to get one.  They were in a near panic.  I saw this myself.  This was due in large extent to the panic whipped up in the mainstream media.  The COVID virus was reported to be deadly.  Its death toll (which we now know was highly inflated) was used to induce fear.  Then the early adapters relied completely on pronouncements from the vaccine manufacturers and health authorities like Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Trust the science, it was said.  The vaccines were both effective and safe.

Unfortunately, the population (and their primary care physicians) were denied the opportunity to hear alternative opinions on these novel vaccines from credible immunologists and other scientists.  All views contrary to the official party line were squelched by the media and censored on social media.  Thus, the decision to take a COVID vaccine early on was, at best, based on the word of the experts or, at worse, the emotion of fear. As time moved on, however, alternative opinions and facts on the vaccines began escaping from the media bubble and from under the censorship of Big Tech.  This new information include evidence showing that 1) the vaccines are not nearly as effective as advertised; 2) the survival rate from COVID is over 99 percent; and 3) a troubling number of people have experienced serious side effects, up to and including death.  And it doesn't end there.  Credible scientists like Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, are raising the alarm about the potential of serious long-term side-effects from these vaccines. To be sure, although this information is out there, the censorship is still going on.  It's just not as effective as it once was."    Do the people who rushed to get the COVID shot have buyer's remorse? - American Thinker  

Quote: "CDC Releases School COVID Transmission Study but Buries One of the Most Damning Parts. Although one principle cited in the debate over masking students is that such a step will limit the spread of the coronavirus, the foundational research that federal recommendations rest on never came to that conclusion. The torturous trail of science and masking is explored by David Zweig in New York magazine, starting with a May study released by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Toward the end of the multi-page report concerning a survey of schools in Georgia, the report touches on what it could about elementary school students wearing masks. “The 21% lower incidence in schools that required mask use among students was not statistically significant compared with schools where mask use was optional,” the CDC report said. “This finding might be attributed to higher effectiveness of masks among adults, who are at higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection but might also result from differences in mask-wearing behavior among students in schools with optional requirements.” As Zweig noted in New York magazine, “With tens of millions of American kids headed back to school in the fall, their parents and political leaders owe it to them to have a clear-sighted, scientifically rigorous discussion about which anti-COVID measures actually work and which might put an extra burden on vulnerable young people without meaningfully or demonstrably slowing the spread of the virus.” To that end, he noted that experts believe the CDC’s May conclusion was very significant. “That a masking requirement of students failed to show independent benefit is a finding of consequence and great interest,” said Vinay Prasad, an associate professor in the University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. “It should have been included in the summary.” “The summary gives the impression that only masking of staff was studied,” said Tracy Hoeg, an epidemiologist, “when in reality there was this additional important detection about a student-masking requirement not having a statistical impact.”  [...]  “The CDC cannot ‘follow the science’ because there is no relevant science.” There are other factors to consider as well."     CDC Releases School COVID Transmission Study but Buries One of the Most Damning Parts (westernjournal.com) 

Quote: "Breaking: FDA to give full approval to COVID vaccines; no public hearing; no transparency; no open review of vaccine data.  It's all happening behind closed doors. The fix is in. We’re racing from “emergency use authorization” of experimental vaccines to “full approval.” Boom. Despite the promise of “transparency” prior to giving full approval to the COVID vaccines, the FDA is set to give its final green light today, or later this week. It’s a slam-dunk. And there is NO public hearing. This means the vaccine marketing/intimidation/mandate campaigns will ramp up much higher. “Well, now there is NO reason for anyone to refuse the shot. The FDA states it is completely safe and effective.” Obviously, the FDA didn’t want to allow even mainstream “experts” to speak in a public hearing before approval; the agency is running a very tight ship. No slip-ups. No defections. 

An 8/20 article in the BMJ (“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”) quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example: “Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”

          “’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”

        “Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.” “’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.” “’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.” Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.

Amidst a tsunami of reports of vaccine injuries and deaths from around the world, the FDA is proving it is an agency that will certify maiming and killing without hesitation."    Breaking: FDA to give full approval to COVID vaccines; no public hearing; no transparency; no open review of vaccine data « Jon Rappoport's Blog (nomorefakenews.com)