The charges that
the left wing mainstream media are so full of themselves and their self
righteous importance that they lie with impunity is patently true. Yet
they turn around and claim that it is Trump and conservatives who do the
lying. Quote: "Well, there are the various columnists at the New York
Times who have taken to referring to the virus as the “Trumpvirus”
and blaming the President for its spread. There are the reporters who
claimed Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, had been silenced by the administration. There’s
Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) who went on TV to amplify the suggestion that Fauci had been silenced. Media reporting about Anthony Fauci was so intense that even Joe Biden went on CNN and repeated that the experts were being silenced
and no one at CNN corrected him. There are the Democrats who claimed
the President had cut the budget for the CDC and the National Institutes
of Health. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and others made those claims
even though it wasn’t true. That forced the Associated Press to issue a fact check
that defended the administration. The AP headline dares to suggest the
Democrats are engaged in politicizing the virus: “Democrats distort
coronavirus readiness”. https://webmail.centurylink.net/mail#37
John
Stossel has a good way of simplifying the complex reason so much of the
news is what he calls stupid news. He explains here. Quote: ""Fake
news!" shouts the president. His supporters cheer. That drives my
colleagues into a frenzy of self-absorbed handwringing: "Threats to
press freedom ... press persecution!" It's silly. American reporters are
hardly less safe because of President Donald Trump's hyperbole. (Trump is reckless
when he uses the term in other countries. Authoritarians in Russia,
China, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, etc., now cite "fake news" while
they jail or kill reporters. He should shut up about "fake news" when
he's overseas.) But I smiled when I first heard him use the phrase, not
because news stories are "fake"-- they typically aren't (reporters who
make things up are usually caught and fired) -- but because so much of
what people call "news" is press releases and breathless exaggerations
of isolated problems. It's stupid news." https://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2019/08/07/stupid-news-n2551293?
This
item reveals just how hypocritical way too many in social media jobs
really are. Google is king of the hill when it comes to being a left
wing propaganda agency yet this employee warns people of the dangers of
being on Tucker Carlson's show on FOX. He is a right wing agent. Last
time I checked Tucker is hard on people on both sides of the political
aisle if they do and say stupid things. He is fair and balanced which
people at Google cannot even come close to claiming. Recent studies of
their nefarious activities reveal that I am right and this Google
employee is dead wrong.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/google-employee-anyone-who-goes-on-tucker-carlson-is-complicit-in-helping-him-spread-dangerous-propaganda/?
Does Google spy on school kids? This piece says they do.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/02/20/new-mexico-sues-google-for-allegedly-spying-on-children-in-classrooms/?
This
is the typical behavior of far left wing MSNBC. They force Chris
Matthews to apologize for criticizing a communist but give him a pass
for defaming the President of the United States. Quote: "MSNBC host
Chris Matthews was forced to apologize to Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders
of Vermont for comparing the results of the Nevada caucus with the fall
of France to the Nazi’s in World War II. Writing for Fox News, Ben
Shapiro observes there are much worse things Matthews could have said
about Sanders — all based in truth. Sanders resolutely defended
communist dictator Fidel Castro in the 1980s saying he was “physically
nauseated” by former President John F. Kennedy’s “hatred for the Cuban
revolution.” He said after visiting Cuba in 1989, “I did not see a
hungry child. I did not see any homeless people.” Such are the
standards of left wing sycophants.
This
is an example of precisely why no one should ever believe anything
people in the mainstream media write or say. This is an incredible
piece by the Washington Post. The people running that paper are just as
demented as most Democrats. Their misperception of reality is simple
amazing. Quote: "In arguing that Sanders and Warren are unrealistic,
grandiose ideologues, the Washington Post points to, of all people, former President Obama. The same man who, upon becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3, 2008,
told supporters in St. Paul, Minnesota, that, “we will be able to look
back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to
provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless.” “This was the
moment,” Obama continued, the applause growing louder and more
enthusiastic, “when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet
began to heal, this was the moment when we ended a war, and secured our
nation, and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.” Obama,
who coasted into the White House in 2008 and 2012 on grandiose promises,
and with little to no vetting from the national press, is the person
the Washington Post editorial board has in mind when it says,
“Candidates who promise big ideas should also be pressed on how they
will realize them.” “[T]he United States is a vast, pluralistic country,
and Congress will continue to reflect its ideological range,” the
newspaper warns. “Big donors and billionaires may exercise too much
influence, but Democratic primary voters should be wary of candidates
who use that fact to explain away all opposition to their ideas. Even if
you undid Citizens United and enacted campaign finance reform,
sustainable policy in America would emerge only by means of principled
compromise.” It is almost as if the Washington Post forgets or ignores that its ideal U.S. president rather famously muscled though parts of his agenda via a “phone and a pen.” Does the newspaper believe all those executive orders overturned by President Trump
appeared out of nowhere? “The next president should have a vision of
progress for the nation that is expansive and inspiring. It also should
be grounded in mathematical and political reality,” the editorial
concludes. The Washington Post is not wrong when it says a
president should be both pragmatic and have a realistic vision that
includes compromise. But the paper’s nostalgia for Obama, who
over-promised as a candidate and gave the bird to compromise as
president, suggests the paper is really more anti-Sanders and
anti-Warren than it is concerned with strict practicality."
https://www.leapfrogamerica.com/why-cant-bernie-sanders-and-elizabeth-warren-be-as-realistic-as-the-guy-who-promised-to-slow-the-rise-of-the-oceans/
If
you do not think Google is a dirty rotten organization to its very core
you need to read this piece. It will change your mind. Total and
complete adherence to left wing bias is their stock in trade. Quote:
"The word “progressive” was described as modern, liberal, advanced,
forward-looking, forward-thinking, go-ahead, enlightened, enterprising,
innovative, up-and-coming, new, dynamic, avant-garde, modernistic,
disruptive; radical, left-wing, reforming, reformist, revolutionary,
revisionist, and progressivist. The word “liberal” had similarly positive results: tolerant,
unprejudiced, unbigoted, broad-minded, open-minded, enlightened,
forbearing; permissive, free, free and easy, easygoing, laissez-faire,
libertarian, latitudinarian, unbiased, impartial, nonpartisan. The only remotely negative words were indulgent, lenient, lax, and soft. Perhaps the most offensive term on Google’s dictionary is the word “patriot.” The synonyms offered are nationalist, loyalist; chauvinist, jingoist, jingo, flag-waver, isolationist, and xenophobe. It
almost sounds like they’ve hired Colin Kaepernick to supply their
synonyms." And, "In an era obsessed with fake news and rampant
polarization, it would be nice if our supposedly unbiased resources
weren’t also trying to push their own political agenda down their users’
collective throats. In fact, being honest and unbiased during these
uncertain times would be a much-needed act of patriotism. And no, I’m
not trying to use that word as an insult. I’m using it as it’s been
used throughout the ages – as putting aside our petty differences and
doing what’s right for our
nation. https://townhall.com/columnists/markmeckler/2019/08/03/googles-dictionary-supplies-biased-terms-calls-patriots-xenophobes-n2551120?
Can anyone tell me that their Google and their so call liberal and
progressive peers fit the definitions matches anything close to their
actual behavior as liberals and progressives? Most of the words they
assign to themselves are the exact opposite of their actual behavior.
They are complete self centered frauds, liars, propagandists and
censors and worse.
More
insight into the left wing bias that fills the ranks of Google from top
to bottom as summarized by a former engineer. Quote: "On Friday,
former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee told Fox News's Tucker Carlson
that his former employer will try to prevent President Donald Trump's
reelection. "Do you think that Google will attempt to influence the
election outcome, attempt to prevent Trump from being reelected?"
Carlson asked. "I do believe so," Cernekee replied.
"I think that’s a major threat. They have openly stated that they think
2016 was a mistake. They thought Trump should have lost in 2016. They
really want Trump to lose in 2020. That’s their agenda." The former
engineer also said Google has "very biased people running every level of
the company. They have quite a bit of control over the political
process. That’s something we should really worry about."
https://pjmedia.com/trending/former-google-engineer-says-google-will-try-to-prevent-trumps-reelection/?
If
this is an example of the journalist profession that is suppose to
provide us with facts, and nothing but the facts and not their opinions,
then I do not want to see, listen to or read anything they have to
say. They are not journalists. They are biased propaganda agents of
the socialist leaning Democrat party. And, that means they are
completely useless, having no morals or ethics.
https://flagandcross.com/cnn-analyst-calls-trump-a-f-ing-moron-instantly-loses-his-white-house-press-pass/
This piece
provides a very good reason to never ever trust anything the CNN
broadcasts. Quote: "Fake news outlets such as CNN fell in lust with
former porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti, but that relationship suffered
a sudden divorce after the scam artist was indicted on wide-ranging
criminal charges. His recent extortion conviction has left CNN and
others with egg on their faces, again. That’s because there’s no taking
back the well-documented fact media outlets once held the felon up as
the man to take on President Donald Trump in the 2020 election. “After
being called everything from a political and legal expert to the ‘man
who could take down Trump’ and given hundreds of segments and hours of
television time from both CNN and MSNBC, Michael Avenatti is headed to
jail,” political satirist Tim Young said. “Not only has he proven
himself to be a fraud, but he’s exposed the fact that these networks are
willing to book literally anyone who confirms their Trump Derangement
Syndrome.” And, "The fake news love-fest came to a screeching halt
when his dirty dealings came to light. A former law associate sued
Avenatti for fraud, he was evicted from office space for owing tens of
thousands in back rent, and he was “charged in California with wire
fraud, trying to obstruct the IRS, identity theft, bank fraud and false
testimony under oath during bankruptcy,” according to reports. Among the
more heinous acts, he was accused of was embezzling approximately $4
million from a paraplegic client, according to federal prosecutors. The
49-year-old probably didn’t celebrate Valentine’s Day after his wife
filed for divorce over issues with the stable porn actresses he
represented. The former fake news media darling was recently convicted
of attempting to extort more than $20 million out of Nike. CNN’s
guest-star faces more than 40 years behind bars, and that may just be
the beginning of his woes. The IRS has seized his bank accounts, assets,
and plans to take him to task over tax evasion and other charges. At
last report, he was being held in solitary confinement in the New York
jail that once housed El Chapo. CNN recently published complaints on his
behalf about the living conditions. Maybe the fake news outlet believes
he’ll get out in time for the November election."
https://www.libertyplanet.com/articles/creepy-porn-lawyer-michael-avenatti-convicted-of-extortion/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment