Friday, December 15, 2017

The Rest Of The Story 1

Read this item and see if you believe the liberal left's narrative that Muslims are up and up about themselves and their love of peaceful coexistence. Quote: "There are Muslim communities in virtually every nation – and in many – they have played a pivotal, constructive, and welcomed role in national development. If even 1% of the world’s Muslims were violent terrorists bent on conquering the world, that would constitute an army 18 million strong – or in other words – larger than the next 20 largest armies on Earth combined. Most critics of Islam infer that the number is actually much higher than 1% – many suggesting that the majority of Muslims either are engaged in or support terrorism. It is logical to conclude that if even 1% were dedicated to terrorism and the “conquest of infidels,” the war would have ended in their favor long ago. It is clear that there is not even 1% across Islam engaged in or supporting terrorism. Across the Arab World, the vast majority of Muslims, Christians, other sects, and the secular, stand united against terrorism. It is clear that a mountain of lies stands between many and the truth – a mountain built so tall that it leaves entire segments of targeted populations in the perpetual darkness of ignorance."    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/11/08/stucky-qotd-what-if-its-really-muslim-and-not-mooslim-fuk/

This item is 100% right. The powerful get the government to do what they want them to do.  To heck with what the people want or need.  Quote: "For the first time, a majority of Republicans are in favor of legalizing marijuana, according to a Gallup poll out Wednesday. Fifty-one percent of Republicans tell Gallup that, yes, marijuana should be legal, up from 42 percent last year. That support has led to a whopping two-thirds of Americans (64 percent) supporting pot legalization, the highest ever recorded by Gallup. Gallup has data on the question since 1969. Marijuana was made illegal in the United States on the back of a campaign financed and promoted by the Hearst paper empire, which was deeply concerned about the ability of hemp to displace wood pulp for paper production.  The Hearsts owned vast expanses of pulp wood forest along with newspapers and used the latter to protect the former by driving public opinion about marijuana — thereby effectively outlawing hemp."  And, "Laws are not supposed to be predicated on lies, and when they are and the lie is discovered the government has an obligation to scrap said law.  Yet for decades it has refused to do exactly that."    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/11/08/get-politics-and-religious-bigotry-out-of-the-law/

This assessment of the ongoing reshuffling of political power in the Middle East is something to watch.   https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/11/11/if-the-saudi-arabia-situation-doesnt-worry-you-youre-not-paying-attention/

Looks like Harvey Weinstein may be going down for his evil behavior.  https://pagesix.com/2017/11/03/nypd-says-it-is-working-to-arrest-harvey-weinstein-for-raping-paz-de-la-huerta/    This item reveals that the LAPD is now investigating the alleged Hollywood pedophile ring.    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5060219/LAPD-confirms-investigating-Corey-Feldman-case.html

The Supreme Court vindicates Trump's position on immigration.  Only one judge, Sonya Sotomayer, did not support the decision.  Quote: "The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that it would dismiss lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s executive order banning refugee admissions, on the same day the administration announced it would begin re-admitting refugees under a new screening process, according to ABC News. The high court’s ruling is a huge win for the Trump administration since, as The Daily Caller reports, the move vacated lower court rulings that said the executive orders were unlawful and could have restricted the president’s authority. The refugee admissions to the United States resumed on Tuesday after “enhanced vetting” procedures for individuals from 11 countries that were deemed to pose a risk to the United States were put into place. Those nations were not identified publicly by the administration."

This former abortionist testifies before Congress that she no longer supports the procedure and agrees with the bill that forbids them when the baby's heartbeat can be detected.    http://1776christian.com/former-abortionist-defends-heartbeat-protection-act/

Quote: "New research reveals that more Americans than ever have a negative opinion of “political correctness”. According to a poll released by the CATO Institute, just 28% of people believe political correctness has made society better, while 71% of Americans believe that the cultural trend has “done more to silence important discussions our society needs to have.” Recently, those on the left have run on platforms touting the need for more political correctness in our society. Meanwhile, one of the pillars of the Trump campaign was the idea that political correctness is a scourge that needs to be done away with. Given polls such as the one conducted by the CATO Institute, it’s easy to postulate that Trump’s stance on political correctness played a big role in his 2016 victory.  So why is that political correctness has fallen out of favor? On the surface, “being PC” seems innocent enough. The idea of speaking and behaving in a way that is non-offensive to others doesn’t seem like too big of a controversy. However, if you look past the surface, it doesn’t the participants of CATO’s survey are onto something. Political correctness is a cudgel often used by those on the far left to silence the voices of anyone they don’t agree with. Why debate with someone on the real issues when you can plug your ears and call them a racist, bigoted, homophobe?"     http://www.conservativezone.com/articles/poll-americans-are-sick-of-political-correctness/

This is about liberal organizations and their terrorist friends.  Quote: "Major American foundations have given millions of dollars in funding to Islamic organizations accused of having ties to radical Islamist movements or designated terrorist organizations and a group of activists are trying to convince them to stop.   Groups like Islamic Relief Worldwide, which some countries have banned for allegedly funding Hamas and other terrorist organizations, have received millions of dollars from corporate charities like the GE Foundation, community foundations like the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, and independent foundations like George Soros’ Open Society Foundation."   http://americanactionnews.com/articles/us-foundations-give-millions-to-islamic-groups-accused-of-terror-ties

Question.  Do you trust anyone who embraces the tactics, principles, philosophy of the political left?  Before you answer you may want to read this item. Quote: "A former deputy assistant secretary of defense in the Obama administration official, Evelyn Farkas, revealed that she was telling her former colleagues: Get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration, because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people that left….That the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their, the staff, the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried, because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more. The full extent of the Obama administration’s campaign of surveillance, espionage and sabotage has yet to be revealed. The right-wing media have excitedly latched onto the Clinton revelations in order to put out a ridiculous story of their own. Americans are still innocent victims; Russians are still villains interfering with our gloriously pristine elections. The new victim-in-chief is Trump and the new Russian colluder-in-chief is Clinton. As ever, nothing changes in Washington."    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/11/04/how-obama-and-hillary-clinton-weaponized-the-dossier/

No comments: