Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Climate Science 1

This item discusses nine reasons why science is in decline in academia.  See if you agree. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/02/nine_causes_of_scientific_decline_in_american_academia.html

This is a startling and potentially comforting scientific finding.   https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/07/27/chernobyl-and-bikini-atoll-are-rewriting-science/


This study, if it proves true, puts a dagger in the heart of the theory CO2 is a dangerous greenhouse gas.  However, much further study is necessary before any conclusions can be reached.  Quote: "A new scientific paper contends the entire foundation of the man-made global-warming theory – the assumption that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere by trapping heat – is wrong.  If confirmed, the study’s findings would crush the entire “climate change” movement to restrict CO2 emissions, the authors assert.  Some experts contacted by WND criticized the paper, while others advised caution.  Still others suggested that the claimed discovery represents a massive leap forward in human understanding – a “new paradigm.” The paper argues that concentrations of CO2 and other supposed “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere have virtually no effect on the earth’s temperature. They conclude the entire greenhouse gas theory is incorrect."     http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/study-blows-greenhouse-theory-out-of-the-water/

Quote: "Probably beyond any other frustration in today’s world is the complete lack of accountability and punishment of any person other than ordinary citizens at the bottom of the economic and social ladder. The political power elite and those they often use and sometimes protect are rarely brought to justice. Nowhere is that truer than in the complete and deliberate deception that humans are causing global warming perpetrated by the establishment. It is undoubtedly an original, longest lasting, and possibly largest, example of “fake news;” that is information designed to misinform with a false narrative. It was “fake news” in the structure and procedures designed to produce a specific scientific result, but it went further. Maurice Strong and the gang at the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) built in mechanisms to restrict their discovery and exposure. As Elaine Dewar wrote in “Cloak of Green,”  “He (Strong) could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.”"  And, "I am unaware of any person who has been held accountable in any way for the biggest deliberate deception in history that has created completely unnecessary social and economic upheaval and wasted trillions of dollars. None of this is surprising because a lack of accountability is a pandemic among all politicians and the power elite. It parallels the destructive change in thinking associated with the belief that a person only broke the law if they got caught. Crime without punishment is no longer crime."   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/08/no_author/great-climate-deception/

This is an eye-opener.  It seems that true science is starting to supplant fake science in the global warming/climate change debate.  Quote: "It has taken far too long, but the self-correcting mechanisms of science finally are contradicting the global warming fraud. Despite billions of dollars of grants for those who support the so-called “consensus” (itself, a lie), and the fear of retaliation, scholars interested in the truth are publishing a wave of scientific papers contradicting the orthodoxy."   And,  "The No Tricks Zone has catalogued 650 skeptic scientific papers already, and as we see, the wave is growing larger.  The huge problem for the Warmists is that “cutting edge research” now works against them."     http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/06/science_fights_back_against_the_global_warming_fraud.html

Finally, a court decision that makes perfect sense.  Quote: "The EPA panel went further in refuting the Sierra Club's interpretation of the Scientific Integrity Policy. The liberal environmentalist group had branded Pruitt a "climate denier" in its complaint.
"Expressing an opinion about science is not a violation of the EPA Scientific Integrity Policy," the EPA panel said. "Indeed, the Scientific Integrity Policy—in the spirit of promoting vigorous debate and inquiry—specifically encourages employees to express their opinion should the employee disagree with scientific data, scientific interpretations, or scientific conclusions."    http://freebeacon.com/issues/scientific-integrity-committee-clears-pruitt-against-sierra-clubs-climate-denier-charge/?   The Scientific Integrity Committee is obviously filled with "real scientist" who understand science is never settled and always needs to be the subject of vigorous debate.

This is a shocker, well maybe not.  Quote: " A rational review of global warming data has unveiled systematic scientific fraud to alter temperature data in support of the global warming false narrative. This is the largest discovery of scientific fraud in the history of science, and it shows that “global warming” and “climate change” are elaborate science hoaxes rooted in fraud, not fact. As The Daily Caller reports:  A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”    http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-25-global-warming-bombshell-systematic-science-fraud-revealed-in-alteration-of-temperature-data.html   More evidence of fraud.    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/

This is a sad commentary regarding people who manipulate data to derive an outcome they want.  The dishonesty of their efforts destroys any credibility they once had.    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/07/16/research-team-slams-global-warming-data-in-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-with-credible-temperature-data/

By now with the endless findings of manipulated data, dishonest adherence to politics rather than science, and rank hypocrisy most people should know that Obama's claim that "climate change is the crisis of our time" is just one more of his infamous lies.  His lies are a result of his total ignorance of science but deeply rooted in political gamesmanship fully intending for governments to rob peter to pay paul.  Climate change collaborators get rich with stolen wealth.  Along the way climate change proponents either knowingly or unwittingly are going to inflict much more harm than any possible good, so say the economists and honest scientists.    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/08/02/australia-weather-experts-falsify-climate-change/

Quote:"As I explain in these science education videos, “greening” the planet requires higher CO2, warmer temperatures and less ice. That’s not a crisis, it’s a blessing for all plant life and ecosystems across the planet. It makes me wonder: Why do climate change alarmists hate rainforests so much that they want to freeze the planet and turn warm water back into frozen ice?  The answer is because they are all mindless cultists who don’t understand anything at all about climatology, science or botany. They are nothing more than Programmable Life Forms (PLFs) who have been brainwashed by a wholly dishonest, globalist-run media that uses the climate change baloney to enslave and indoctrinate the masses. The entire climate change hoax demonstrates just how incredibly stupid and gullible most humans really are, revealing that if they could turn Earth into a lifeless, cold, icy wasteland, they would consider that the ultimate success of the “green” movement.  Stupid beyond belief."    http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-26-nasa-confirms-sea-levels-have-been-falling-across-the-planet-for-two-years-media-silent.html

A thoughtful presentation of facts.  Quote: "And that brings me to my final point. Since the fall of communism, global warming has been, without question, the most potent weapon in the hands of those who wish to control the behavior of their fellow human beings. Lukewarmists like me do not caution against visions of an environmental apocalypse out of some perverse hatred of nature. On the contrary, concern for the environment is laudable and, I happen to believe, nearly universal. But environmentalism, like all –isms, can become totalitarian. It is for that reason that, when it comes to our environmental policies, we ought to tread very carefully."   https://fee.org/articles/environmentalism-is-totalitarian/?

No comments: