Dealing In Truth To Help Us Vote Truthfully 1

      Over 50 years ago Paul Harvey saw the truth that is today's total and absolute corruption of our culture and our governing institutions.  Read this commentary he delivered on his radio program on 3 April 1965. 

"If I were the Devil . . . I mean, if I were the Prince of Darkness, I would of course, want to engulf the whole earth in darkness. I would have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree, so I should set about however necessary to take over the United States. I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.”   To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square”.  In the ears of the young marrieds, I would whisper that work is debasing, that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be extreme in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct. And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to say after me: “Our Father, which art in Washington” . . .

If I were the devil, I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull an uninteresting. I’d threaten T.V. with dirtier movies and vice versa. And then, if I were the devil, I’d get organized. I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing and less work, because idle hands usually work for me. I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. And I’d tranquilize the rest with pills. If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects but neglect to discipline emotions . . . let those run wild. I would designate an atheist to front for me before the highest courts in the land and I would get preachers to say “she’s right.” With flattery and promises of power, I could get the courts to rule what I construe as against God and in favor of pornography, and  thus, I would evict God from the courthouse, and then from the school house, and then from the houses of Congress and then, in His own churches I would substitute psychology for religion, and I would deify science because that way men would become smart enough to create super weapons but not wise enough to control them.

If I were Satan, I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg, and the symbol of Christmas, a bottle. If  I were the devil, I would take from those who have and I would give to those who wanted, until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. And then, my police state would force everybody back to work. Then, I could separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines, and objectors in slave camps. In other words, if I were Satan, I’d just keep on doing what he’s doing.     Paul Harvey, Good Day."

     Does this look or sound at all familiar to you?  It should.  It is the truth.  We can start reversing course 8 November 2016.  Lets all do our part.  Please vote with great care.   PS: We owe Jim Cook thanks for sharing this bit of Paul Harvey wisdom.

Past notes addressed this dilemma.  Why is it that no movement by any liberal Democrat at any time throughout this campaign has NOT launched a "Never Hillary" campaign like some Republicans with a conscience did with their "Never Trump" campaign???  This item deals with that dilemma.  Given the well documented history of Hillary's endless lies, unethical behavior and now apparent criminality, one would think that at least one Democrat would have the fortitude or at least the decency to challenge her legitimacy.  But no such person has arisen. That alone speaks volumes of the vacuousness and lack of ethics residing in the progressive, liberal, Democrat political left.  Quote: "If Trump supporters are expected to morally justify their vote, Hillary supporters bear the same burden. The fact that only the political right is experiencing moral reticence about their nominee is the surest sign yet that the left has given itself over completely to a depraved pursuit of political power as the only virtue worth possessing.  That is unquestionably the road to tyranny. If you’re willing to morally affirm that with your vote, Donald Trump is the least of your concerns." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/lack_of_neverhillary_movement_reveals_no_principle_on_the_left.html 

My sentiments exactly!  Quote: "Will Bill and Hillary ever be brought to justice? Only if Donald Trump is elected president – maybe. The catch is that President Obama would have ever incentive to pardon Hillary, whether or not she wins the presidency (and, yes, she could win). A President Hillary Clinton’s DOJ would never pursue criminal charges against Barack Obama for his breach of national security or for cover-ups carried out by Loretta Lynch at his DOJ. Hillary could even pardon her husband and whoever else, should circumstances dictate. Counted among the “whoever else” are plenty of Democrats whose hands are dirty by degrees.  If Hillary Clinton wins the White House expect all hell to break loose. Allegations of wrongdoing will multiply; the proof will keep coming and deepening. Half the nation or more will never reconcile itself to a Clinton presidency. Why should Hillary Clinton ever be trusted? Talk about a cancer on the executive branch.  Clinton’s presidency would begin crippled and then go on life-support. Impeachment? That depends on the U.S. House. Would a Republican majority led by Paul Ryan ever attempt impeachment, particularly if the Democrats control the Senate? The Senate is where president Hillary would be tried. Remember the result when Bill was impeached? (Though wouldn’t it be ironic to have two President Clintons impeached? Who’d dream that up?)  But burn this into your mind. Hillary Clinton could never have advanced to a presidential nomination and, perhaps, the White House but for the Democratic Party. Democrats are culpable for foisting a looming, shattering disaster on the American people. However this election turns out, make Democrats pay dearly, at ballot boxes and in every way conceivable."     http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/hold_democrats_strictly_accountable_for_the_clintons.html

The title of this piece tells the full story.  Quote: "The presidential race has changed because The Awful Truth about the Clintons is sinking in."    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/the_presidential_race_has_changed_because_the_awful_truth_about_the_clintons_is_sinking_in.html   This item is titled "Biggest Scandal in U.S. History is about to break".   It regards passage of an untold number of classified emails over unclassified systems between Hillary and her top aide, Huma Abedin.    http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/biggest-scandal-in-u-s-history-about-to-break/   Here is more information regarding Huma and her background.  What you learn may surprise you.    http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/hillarys-surrogate-daughter-tied-to-terrorists-911-funders/

This is devastating information for the Clinton camp. Quote: "1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.  2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.  3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.  4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department. 5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html?    and,   http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/02/validly-predicated-investigation-reports-prove-fbi-aggressively-investigating-clinton-foundation-potential-pay-play-crimes/?

So much obvious obstruction and corruption at the highest levels of our government.    http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/is-attorney-general-lynch-preparing-a-november-surprise/    This should disturb even the most avid Clinton fan.  Quote: "How do all these people continue to maintain their allegiance to and defend Hillary Clinton and the criminal enterprise that is the Clinton Foundation?  The Clintons have violated so many laws, state and federal, and yet they continue to assume they are above the law because they have gotten away with breaking it for over thirty years.  As proof of the lying, the cheating, the selling of the State Department, and all the underhanded dirty tricks seeps out, how do their on-screen acolytes rationalize supporting a woman who is so obviously morally and ethically challenged?"     http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/clinton_sycophants_blinded_by_the_light_.html 

Well worth the read.  Quote: "Recently reopened by the FBI, the investigation of Hillary’s criminality is very real and under any normal circumstances would or should guarantee not only her removal as presidential candidate regardless of how close we are to the elections, but also a warrant for her arrest. The Hillary crime team is not about to lay down for this incredible moment in US history however. Hillary has unleashed her attackers on the FBI and its director James Comey, who of course has been one of Hillary’s very controlled minions all along until now perhaps.  To counter the application of the rule of law (remember, Hillary broke the law), to preserve her road to presidency and to block her road to jail Hillary’s attack dogs have been released on the justice system itself, something historically unusual and alone worthy of top news status. Attack dog number one, Senator Harry Reid recently threatened FBI director Comey stating the following in a letter to him:  "I am writing to inform you that my office has determined that these actions may violate the Hatch Act… Through your partisan actions, you may have broken the law."  Historically and astonishingly Reid is attempting to put the elections before the rule of law itself. This is apparently a common theme and strategy in the Hillary criminal camp. So much so that they are attempting to make this about James Comey instead of the actual criminal who broke the law, Hillary Clinton."          http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/hillary-attack-dogs-law-fbi-comey-coup-detat/

This provides understanding of just what Hillary faces.  This time it is a grand jury. Read to understand what this means.  Quote: "In this, Mrs. Clinton is simply repeating a tactic which she and her catspaw Sidney Blumenthal used to good effect during the Whitewater, Travelgate, and Monica Lewinsky investigations in the 1990s. And that tactic worked. It’s called grand jury secrecy. Now that Hillarygate is, for the first time, a grand jury investigation, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) prohibits the FBI and prosecutors from saying anything about "matters occurring before the grand jury." Their lips are sealed. Team Hillary's lips, however, are not. They are neither federal prosecutors nor "agents of the grand jury." So, Mrs. Clinton and her spokesmen -- unlike the federal law enforcement officials they've been targeting all weekend -- are free to tell us everything they know. Let's see if they do. A reporter should ask them. And, in the meantime, let's not bother to hold our breaths. If Hillary really wants "transparency," let her release the FBI's warrant application for permission to search Huma Abedin and Mr. Weiner's emails for evidence relating to whether Hillary's use of a private server violated federal law. Huma's lawyers likely have it. If not, they can certainly get it. Huma, of course, is also free to release the emails too. That's why Hillary's demand for "transparency" by the FBI is moonshine. She damn well knows the feds can't do it. She also now knows that the threat level against her has just been upgraded to ORANGE.    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/11/dont_be_fooled_hillarygate_probe_is_now_a_formal_federal_criminal_investigation.html