After
all these many pre-election months of watching news programs, panel
discussions, Sunday news shows on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and Fox News, as
well as talk radio, the burning question is, as more and more is
revealed about the Clintons unscrupulous ways of being by Wikileaks,
Project Veritas, and the FBI, why do the people around the Clintons
stay? With each passing day, the breadth and depth of their duplicity,
their venality is made provably clearer and yet the same people show up
day after day, night after night defending them: Bill Burton, Julie
Roginsky, Lanny Davis, Robert Zimmerman, Dana Bash, Gloria Borger,
James Carville, Andrea Mitchell, Jessica Tarlov, Don Lemon, Coco Soodek,
Donna Brazile, Maryanne Walsh, Richard Fowler, Geraldo Rivera, Austan
Goolsbee, and others. The list is long and mystifying. It is not
possible that all these people are as shamelessly corrupt as the
Clintons are, and yet they go on national television and support them.
How do all these people continue to maintain their allegiance to and defend Hillary Clinton and the criminal enterprise that is the Clinton Foundation? The Clintons have violated so many laws, state and federal, and yet they continue to assume they are above the law because they have gotten away with breaking it for over thirty years. As proof of the lying, the cheating, the selling of the State Department, and all the underhanded dirty tricks seeps out, how do their on-screen acolytes rationalize supporting a woman who is so obviously morally and ethically challenged?
How do all these people continue to maintain their allegiance to and defend Hillary Clinton and the criminal enterprise that is the Clinton Foundation? The Clintons have violated so many laws, state and federal, and yet they continue to assume they are above the law because they have gotten away with breaking it for over thirty years. As proof of the lying, the cheating, the selling of the State Department, and all the underhanded dirty tricks seeps out, how do their on-screen acolytes rationalize supporting a woman who is so obviously morally and ethically challenged?
"Since the narcissist suffers from a severe deficit of conscience, their morals and ethics are mobile and adaptive; their rules for living are based strictly on the end game, the bottom line. The question is not whether they will cross the legal, ethical, or moral line but when." Linda Martinez-Lewi, Ph.D
No comments:
Post a Comment