Proponents on both sides of the climate change debate need to read this excellent, well reasoned discussion. Quote: "Climate
scientists are usually clear in their definitions, but that precision
tends to get lost in popular discourse. To say that global warming is a
fact does not, standing alone, mean that we have to accept a particular
causation of that trend. Following from that, we must acknowledge that
the climate has changed quite radically through the millennia, and that
equally is beyond dispute. Climate change of some scale has happened, is
happening, and will happen, regardless of any human activity. The issue
today is identifying and assessing the human role in accelerating that
process." http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/history-and-the-limits-of-the-climate-consensus/
As most people know not all
scientists agree with global warming alarmist scientists. This item
provides an example. Quote: "49 former NASA scientists and astronauts
sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing
the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that
man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting
empirical evidence that calls the theory into question." http://www.cfact.org/2012/04/10/astronauts-and-scientists-send-letter-to-nasa-stop-global-warming-advocacy/?
This esteemed scientist offers
cogent remarks that counter the alarmists whose record and use of
un-validated models are proven failures and not worthy of supporting
policy decisions. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/climate_change_the_burden_of_proof.html
Here is an item suggesting that
volcanic activity is a more serious threat than anything man can do to
affect the climate. Quote: "In a scientific report published in 2015,
experts at the European Science Foundation concluded that large volcanic
eruptions posed the greatest risk to human survival – greater, in fact,
that an asteroid collision with earth, human activity leading to
climate change and nuclear war." http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/yes-its-really-volcano-season-say-scientists/
This is a powerful retort to two
MIT scientists who challenged a critical piece written by Freeman Dyson
in the wake of the recent Paris Climate change summit. I certainly
cannot claim to understand the science discussed in this piece and
questions asked by the author of the two MIT scientists but I get the
gist of the points being made. An interesting read in any case. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/more_misrepresentation_on_climate.html
For those who still believe
climate change is scientific, not only that but "settled science", read
this. It is an assessment of the Paris agreement reached at the recent
"climate" summit. What you will learn is that it is indeed a
socialistic elitists endeavor to enslave the globe to a centralized
socialistic government based on Marxists principles. The agreement says
it is about saving the earth from human induced harm but its real
purpose is to turn the world into a communist utopia. Quote: "To those
complaining that the lack of mandatory emissions targets means that the
Agreement does nothing concrete to combat GHG emissions, I can only say
"Good morning, and welcome to reality!" No, Virginia, Al Gore does not believe polar bears are stranded on ice floes. Ban Ki-moon does not believe climate change causes Islamic fanaticism. No one ever believed that manmade CO2 could cause the Earth to wobble
on its axis. And the U.N. Conference of the Parties on Climate Change
neither believes that it can prevent the global mean temperature from
rising 1.5 °C nor has any intention of seeking such a delusional goal." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/global_tyranny_just_getting_warmed_up.html
This is a sensible response to
the nonsense EPA's "...2012 Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules for
the Clean Power Plan, as issued by EPA and published in the Federal
Register: 80 FR 65979-80." http://www.cfact.org/2016/01/14/cfact-to-epa-scrap-your-dirty-clean-power-plan/?
At this link are charts that
depict temperature data as measured by satellites for the past 37
years. These data are more accurate than randomly distributed land
based collection sites and certainly more accurate than manmade computer
models. (See next item) The charts reveal that the earth has not been
warming for some time. Quote: "UAH v6.0 (University of Alabama
Huntsville satellite) data for November were released a couple of days
ago. Here are updated graphs for various regions showing the furthest
back one can go to show a zero or negative trend (less than +0.01C/ 100
years) in lower tropospheric temperatures. For the second month of the climb towards the El Nino peak, there is still NO pause in the Northern Hemisphere trend. However,
in some regions the pause has lengthened. Note: The satellite record
commences in December 1978. The entire satellite record is now 37 years
long- 444 months." http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/12/17/satellites-show-no-global-warming-for-18-12-years-no-n-pole-warming-for-nearly-14-years-no-s-pole-warming-for-37-years/
Just more proof that proclamations that the earth is warming at the
recent Paris Climate Summit are purposeful lies uttered by dishonest
partisans with an agenda having nothing to do with the climate. Facts
refute the lies.
More
studies coming out with bad news for the Climate Change advocates.
Quote: "The only reason AGW theory became fashionable in the first place
was because, for a period, there seemed to be a very distinct
correlation between rising temperatures and rising levels of man-made
CO2. If – as seems to be becoming increasingly evident – those rising
temperatures were, at best, exaggerated by dodgy scientists and, at
worst, faked, then what we have is the biggest case of fraud in world
history. And there are so many people with vested interests in this
fraud – even newspaper editors – that when presented with the evidence, a
lot of them really would prefer not to know…" http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/21/study-noaa-overestimated-us-warming-50/
Here
is a report of another study that suggests fraud has been committed.
Quote: "The way we measure global temperature is once again facing
scrutiny for over-estimating the planet’s warming trends. Our government
homogenizes weather data so that all nearby weather stations
are all singing the same tune. It’s done to weed out bad stations or
failing weather equipment. We discovered such a thing earlier this year
when we found that perhaps the nation’s most politically iconic weather
station—Washington DC’s Reagan National Airport—was reading temperatures
that were far too hot to be plausible." http://townhall.com/columnists/patrickjmichaels/2015/12/29/homogenized-us-warming-trend-may-be-grossly-exaggerated-n2097972/page/full
This
study details the faults with ground based temperature data
collection. Quote: "Lead author Anthony Watts said of the study: “The
majority of weather stations used by NOAA to detect climate change
temperature signal have been compromised by encroachment of artificial
surfaces like concrete, asphalt, and heat sources like air conditioner
exhausts. This study demonstrates conclusively that this issue affects
temperature trend and that NOAA’s methods are not correcting for this
problem, resulting in an inflated temperature trend. It suggests that
the trend for U.S. temperature will need to be corrected.” He added: “We
also see evidence of this same sort of siting problem around the world
at many other official weather stations, suggesting that the same upward
bias on trend also manifests itself in the global temperature
record”. http://www.cfact.org/2015/12/18/study-noaas-u-s-temperature-data-too-warm/
The alarmist appear to be changing the facts to make Climate Change fit their theories. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/15/climate-alarmists-invent-new-excuse-the-satellites-are-lying/ It gets worse. It is sad that science has become a tool to be manipulated to fit the desires of those with an agenda. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/14/global-warming-saves-the-world/
Regarding
Global Warming this scientist who is a Nobel laureate says to Obama,
"Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong...dead wrong." http://cnsnews.com/news/article/kathleen-brown/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming-0
Al
Gore should be ashamed of the big part he has played in inflicting
untold damage to our nation and across the globe. But, my guess he
feels no shame whatever. He has been laughing all the way to the
bank. http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/julia-seymour/2016/01/25/5-ways-liberal-media-devoted-decade-gores-climate-apocalypse
He was rich when he started his Global Warming alarmism scheme. Thanks
to his efforts he is now much richer than he was when he started. And
the world lost access to funds that could have been used for good rather
than contributed to the massive waste that has ensued.
This
item deals with geoengineering projects such as ChemTrails. If you
don't know anything about this you need to do a web search. It has been
widely poo-pood by those who do not want the public to know about this
and related projects. As this piece notes it is suspected that these
chemical deposits dumped into the atmosphere are part of the reason why
the bee population is collapsing and that climate scientists have
ignored these uncontrolled experiments. Because the experiments such as
ChemTrails are not well based scientifically the Professor cited here
thinks they should be halted. Quote: "In other words, governments and
whomever else are involved in geoengineering efforts are currently
engaged in a large-scale, uncontrolled experiment, according to this
admission by Prof. Lenton. And like many of the rest of us, he wants to
see this experiment halted in favor of sound scientific proposals. But
in order to get there, it must first be acknowledged that this
experiment is real, which is something that chemtrail-deniers can't seem
to get through their dense skulls. It's no longer an argument over
whether or not chemtrails are real – they are – but rather whether or not they've begun, which mounting evidence suggests was many, many years ago." http://www.naturalnews.com/052532_Prof_Tim_Lenton_chemtrails_geoengineering.html
It is long past time to start dealing in facts and stop with the unscientific and historically inaccurate hype. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/climate_science_misrepresented.html
I really do wish more people
would embrace what this esteemed physicist has to say. He has the
credentials to provide an informed opinion and plenty of common sense to
go along with it. Uninformed people are being led by the nose by so
called experts with an agenda. Although certainly no expert our
president is at the head of the list of people who have an agenda.
Truth does not matter to such people. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/emthe_economistsem_hot_air_on_climate_change.html Here is a good follow on. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/08/climate-hustle-perfect-antidote-al-gores-inconvenient-truth/?
Wise people will examine with
great care what the Climate alarmist say. This German scientist gives
us good cause to believe we are being hoodwinked by the
alarmist. Quote: "In 2012, we realized that the data offered by NASA
was not the same as that offered in 2010. The data had been altered.
If in 2010 someone had, for instance, looked up the data for Palma de
Mallorca, they would have seen a cooling of .0076 degrees. But in 2012
it suddenly showed a temperature increase of .0074 degrees. This is not
a one-off. Until then measurements were sacrosanct. Can you call it
fraud or falsification? I’m not a lawyer, but I can say it has been
changed retroactively. If I show you the data a negative judgment is
justified. In 2012 there was twice as much warming in the sample we
examined compared with just two years prior.” http://www.cfact.org/2015/12/12/german-scientist-researchers-fiddling-with-temperature-data/?
This should raise questions in
the minds of critical thinkers. The loss of a suspicious NOAA satellite
after discovery of manipulated data is too convenient for my taste.
Besides why refuse to release data if you have nothing to hide? And who
thinks a totally self absorbed and inefficient, ineffective, wasteful
socialistic UN (which is nothing but a series of unelected ambitious
bureaucracies) can run anything, much less manage global climate? The
complexities of a global climate system are far too complex for any
collection of scientists to understand, much less master. Why anyone
would think a government bureaucracy, a "bigger is better" is beyond
me. An oversized unelected UN bureaucracy for example is a sure recipe
for disaster as our very own bloated government proves beyond any shadow
of a doubt. http://patriotpowerednews.com/noaa-weather-satellite-mysteriously-destroyed-after-agencys-climate-data-manipulation-exposed/
Everyone may not agree with this
piece but it should give everyone something to think about. My
opinion? It is right on target. http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/global-non-warming-will-be-death-of-socialism/
This is an introduction to a 200 year old bit of insight. Ponder it since it relates to the climate change phenomena. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/clowns_on_parade.html
If anyone needs to be convinced
that the political left, including it member scientists, are a bit
demented maybe this item will help. To my way of thinking it is almost
comical the extremes these people will go to promote what normal logical
thinking people know full well is a bunch of hoowie. http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/01/13/claim-global-warming-could-cause-humans-to-develop-webbed-feet-cats-eyes-and-gills/ It is to the point where I feel sorry for them as they see their creation crumbling all around them. http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/01/13/claim-global-warming-could-cause-humans-to-develop-webbed-feet-cats-eyes-and-gills/
This is another item that is
both sad and slightly humorous. It summarizes a theory posited by a
scientist that is intended to save the planet. Her thought is that we
will think ourselves to smaller size to reduce our carbon
footprint (she speculates that we downsize ourselves to approximately
the size of chickens through evolutionary processes). Such is the state
of both climate and evolutionary science. http://eaglerising.com/29004/youll-never-believe-the-latest-crackpot-theory-for-saving-the-human-race-from-climate-change/
A few words to the wise. http://constitutionalrightspac.com/articles/the-man-made-global-warming-hoax-part-deux
No comments:
Post a Comment