Years
from now, when the world knows how events have turned out, historians
will inevitably ask: What unnecessary risks did our presidents foolishly
run? President Obama’s Iran policy will be high on this list. His
misconceptions about Iran will be judged to have stifled, in his first
years, timely, non-violent methods that, by his own later assessments,
had the best chance to head off the looming prospect of Iranian nuclear
weapons. There is value in future historians’ holding leaders to account
for failed policies, but the harsh, concrete consequences may be borne
by many others much sooner.
It didn’t have to be this way. When candidate Obama ran for the
presidency in 2008, there was a lively debate about Iran policy. Obama
maintained that reaching out to Iran and acknowledging its interests was
the best way to persuade it to abandon its nuclear-weapons programs,
which he came to call an “unacceptable” and “hugely dangerous path.” In
his inaugural address, the president offered his hand to those who would
unclench their fist. In his first months in office, he acknowledged
past wrongs done to Iran and declared his resolve “to overcome decades
of mistrust” by moving forward “without preconditions.” He built our
policy to meet his assessment of an Iran ready to abandon its nuclear
program and embrace a new era.Read more: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/315694/wasted-years-hillel-fradkin
No comments:
Post a Comment