Can the democratic United States draw lessons from one-party China to improve the American political system? Yes,
says Tsinghua University professor Daniel A. Bell, writing for The
Christian Science Monitor. Put simply, his argument is that (a)
“political meritocracy” is in many ways a superior system to liberal
democracy; (b) the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which runs the Chinese
government, is a meritocratic system; and (c) by the transitive
property, China’s political system is in many ways superior to
America’s. “Democracy is a flawed political system,” Bell writes, “and
meritocracy can help to remedy some of its flaws.”
While Bell is unfair, I would argue, in comparing his ideal of meritocracy to real-world democracy (which he disdains as “one dollar, one vote”), I will leave theoretical arguments about the relative merits of each system to political scientists. Bell’s positive characterization of the Chinese system, however, deserves closer inspection.
Bell defines political meritocracy as follows:
Read more: http://www.american.com/archive/2012/august/a-look-at-chinas-political-meritocracy
While Bell is unfair, I would argue, in comparing his ideal of meritocracy to real-world democracy (which he disdains as “one dollar, one vote”), I will leave theoretical arguments about the relative merits of each system to political scientists. Bell’s positive characterization of the Chinese system, however, deserves closer inspection.
Bell defines political meritocracy as follows:
Political meritocracy is the idea that a
political system is designed with the aim of selecting political leaders
with above-average ability to make morally informed political
judgments. That is, political meritocracy has two key components: 1) The
political leaders have above-average ability and virtue; and 2) the
selection mechanism is designed to choose such leaders.
And political meritocracy, Bell goes on, is “central to Chinese
political culture.” He supports this contention by citing Confucius, by
referencing political surveys that demonstrate support for the system
“in East Asian societies with a Confucian heritage,” and by describing
the selection process (in which politics play no role, if Bell’s CCP
interlocutor is to be believed) for the secretary general of the CCP
Central Committee’s Organization Department. (Oddly, Bell completely
ignores the concept of guanxi—the unique role that connections and
relationships play in all facets of Chinese life—which is also central
to Chinese political culture.)Read more: http://www.american.com/archive/2012/august/a-look-at-chinas-political-meritocracy
No comments:
Post a Comment