Second, powerful intel agencies have a history of conducting briefings solely to create records that can then be leaked to sympathetic reporters in order to generate stories about said threats.
Third, there were no actionable specifics in the Johnson briefing, as the senator explained to the Post, generating strong evidence for his suspicion the FBI was setting him up.
Fourth, well, the big Giuliani briefing didn't actually happen at all.
"A similar hit piece," Johnson told the Post in another previously unpublished part of his statement, "Had been published the day Senator [Gary] Peters disapproved of my subpoena request for Andrii Telizhenko." And then, there were reportedly no actionable specifics in the Johnson briefing.
The senator explained this to The Washington Post, and it's worth notice because it itself is strong evidence for the senator's near-immediate suspicion that the entire briefing was a set-up by the FBI - just as Trump's had been.
Without specific information, I felt the briefing was completely useless and unnecessary.
Because there was no substance to the briefing, and because it followed the production and leaking of a false intelligence product by Democrat leaders, I suspected that the briefing was being given to be used at some future date for the purpose that it is now being used: to offer the biased media an opportunity to falsely accuse me of being a tool of Russia despite warnings.
Tuesday, May 4, 2021
FBI’s Failed Ron Johnson Set-Up A Case Study In How Agencies Use Corrupt Reporters To Peddle Lies, Hurt Their American Enemies
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment