Examining the Evidence for Democrats' 'No Evidence of Voter Fraud' Claim

On November 14, the U.S. edition of The Guardian ran an article by Harvard Law professor Laurence H. Tribe headlined "Republicans are playing with fire. And we all risk getting burned." Tribe claimed that there is "No evidence" so far of systemic fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

Immediately after Tribe's claim, FNC's moderator quoted a November 12 joint statement put out by the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, a division of the DHS: "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised." The CISA's statement is quite short, and it should be read with a jaundiced eye.

There are no links to web pages that explain its methodology and how it arrived at its conclusion that the 2020 election is "The most secure election in American history." But that's not saying much, given America's long history of election fraud.

Then no one can produce evidence to demonstrate what the legitimate vote counts were in any presidential election, at least within any reasonable time constraints.

For Tribe to pooh-pooh the considerable evidence that has been brought forward is evidence of Tribe's bad faith.

Why shouldn't the Tribes of this world be required to prove that no fraud occurred? For that matter, why shouldn't the boards of elections in the states be required to provide proof of the integrity of their elections? Voters are expected to just accept that the election officials in the several states are competent and honest and wouldn't dream of breaking the law to throw an election to their candidate.

Whenever some self-appointed "Expert" makes a claim of there being "No evidence" for something, insist that he produce the evidence for his claims.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/examining_the_evidence_for_democrats_no_evidence_of_voter_fraud_claim.html