The study of 10,000,000 the pro-COVID lobby won't talk about

The idea of asymptomatic spread started to trend, bit by bit.

Asymptomatic spread was the answer given to the great question: I'm not sick so why should I have to be locked down? Why are we quarantining the healthy? And what possibly could it mean, in any case, to be sick without symptoms? Why are half the PCR-positive tests assigned to people who otherwise seem to be perfectly fine?

On June 7, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, told a press conference that from the known research, asymptomatic spread was "Very rare." "From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual." She added for emphasis: "It's very rare."

The conclusion is not that asymptomatic spread is rare or that the science is uncertain.

Forget even Fauci's previous suggestion that asymptomatic transmission exists but not does drive the spread. Replace all that with: never.

No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases were identified.

With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: who is making decisions and why? Again, this brings me back to the metaphor of fog.

https://www.aier.org/article/asymptomatic-spread-revisited/