Snopes, the left leaning self-proclaimed "fact checker" that hires dominatrixes and former porn stars and hookers to do their "fact checking" has once again been debunked for covering for The New York Times and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
What's so great about this latest "punking" of Snopes is that it comes by way of Infowars and assertions they made more than a year ago about Hillary Clinton colluding with the New York Times by getting information in advance about negative stories that would have an impact on her.
"It is standard journalistic practice for reporters to ask the subjects of their news stories for comment before publishing, and Times reporters Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman were doing their due diligence as professional journalists, said Frank Girardot, a former editor with the Los Angeles News Group and author of several true crime books," responded Snopes to Paul Joseph Watson's story on the collusion, and that assertion is correct, but contacting people for a response to a story and warning them of a potentially negative story coming out are two different things. One is journalism and the other is collusion.
However, here's what Paul Joseph Watson tweeted out.
No comments:
Post a Comment