Interesting Things 1

Recently released Hillary emails according to this piece contains the smoking gun.  She flagrantly disregarded federal laws.  Quote: "And these new emails refute Hillary Clinton’s repeated claims of having little or no knowledge about her email system. She clearly was fully in charge of setting up her outlaw email system and overseeing its use.”  You’ll remember, on July 2, 2016, Clinton was interviewed by the FBI about her use of those private email servers. Clinton told the agents she “could not recall” any briefing or training about the retention of records or handling classified information, according to CNN.  Is there anyone in America — even Hillary Clinton supporters — who thinks that’s true?  Additionally, according to The Associated Press, in a separate, sworn court filing, Clinton said 21 times that she “did not recall” ever sending classified information over that private server. The emails Judicial Watch released on Friday prove that she did "     https://conservativetribune.com/smoking-gun-in-hillary-emails/?

This item is most revealing. Quote: "A new analysis from former assistant U.S. attorney Andy McCarthy thoroughly explains how former President Barack Obama made sure that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not indicted in the criminal investigation into her use of a private email server. In his most recent column, National Review’s McCarthy argues that the decision not to indict Clinton was Obama’s call — not the FBI’s and not the Department of Justice’s — as Obama used a pseudonymous email account to communicate with Clinton on her non-secure email account. Two days after The New York Times broke the scandal about Clinton in March 2015, John Podesta — who was an advisor to the president and head of Clinton's campaign — emailed Clinton confidant and top State Department aide Cheryl Mills to tell her that the email exchanges between Obama and Clinton should not be disclosed, but "held" because of executive privilege. Three days after Podesta's email, Obama lied on national television during an interview with CBS about the email scandal, saying that he learned about it “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”   https://www.dailywire.com/news/26320/head-snake-how-obama-made-sure-hillary-was-not-ryan-saavedra?    Evidence of criminal behavior from the president on down the ranks of his administration is truly remarkable.

Obama must be getting worried that he is in deep trouble.  He has retained an attorney.  We will have to see how the mess he is in pans out.   https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/01/24/barrack-hussein-obama-formally-retains-counsel/   Comey now has counsel, too.  It is the guy Comey leaked his notes to.  Notes which apparently contained classified information.  How can he be his attorney since he was an accomplice in the commission of a felony??   http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/23/comey-friend-leaked-fbi-memos-now-claims-attorney/   This mess is getting more messy with each passing day.

The mess both Obama and Hillary made for themselves as well as many of their accomplices is becoming more complex and expansive as time goes by.  The deep state operatives aware that their time is running out are lawyering up, a sure sign they recognize their sins are likely to result in serious legal jeopardy.   Here is a summary of  what is emerging.  Quote: "On July 2, with the decision that she would not be indicted long since made, Mrs. Clinton sat for an interview with the FBI — something she’d never have done if there were a chance she might be charged. The farce was complete with the Justice Department and FBI permitting two subjects of the investigation — Mills and Clinton aide Heather Samuelson — to sit in on the interview as lawyers representing Clinton. That is not something law enforcement abides when it is serious about making a case. Here, however, it was clear: There would be no prosecution. All cleaned up: no indictment, meaning no prosecution, meaning no disclosure of Clinton–Obama emails. It all worked like a charm . . . except the part where Mrs. Clinton wins the presidency and the problem is never spoken of again."    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455696/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-emails-key-decision-not-indict-Hillary   Everything was going along just fine because they were certain Hillary was going to be president.  So, no one would ever know about their dirty deeds. Evidence would be buried or destroyed, which is against the law, too.  But then something happened at the voting booths last November that upset their tidy little illegal and unethical apple cart.  Now it is likely they will have to pay the price.  Lets hope so.

Looks like there is push back from within the DOJ regarding release to the public the memo apparently disastrous for operatives within the DOJ and FBI.  Protecting national security is the claim.  That is more than likely cover for not exposing unethical or even criminal activities.  This appeal needs to be rejected, the people involved exposed and punished for their dirty deeds. Otherwise the public will assume the worse - that they are indeed hiding unethical and illegal actions and protecting the guilty and their now tarnished reputation.  Their behavior is clearly dirty and needs to be exposed and the stench expunged.   http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/doj-begs-congress-to-not-release-the-memo     This item extends the conversation by providing useful information.   http://www.libertyplanet.com/articles/new-fisa-memo-rocks-the-intel-community/

This is nothing short of collusion by the Democrat party to deny public access to massive Democrat wrong doing.  Quote: "Remember how hard the Justice Department and the FBI fought to not have to turn over documents concerning their pursuit of a warrant to wiretap Trump campaign official Carter Page in 2016? Remember how the House Intelligence Committee subpoenaed the documents in August, but had to deal with constant foot-dragging and excuses until Paul Ryan had to threaten them with a contempt of Congress charge to finally get access to the documents? If you're any sort of critical thinker, it made you wonder what they were hiding - especially since it appears they may have used the fake Steele dossier to convince the FISA court to issue a warrant to wiretap Page. That would mean a Democrat administration got permission under false pretenses to spy on a Republican presidential campaign. That's bigger than Watergate. Well. The House Intelligence Committee finally got to see the documents it wanted, including the FISA warrant application. So if the Steele dossier was in fact the primary basis for that wiretap warrant, the committee members are now aware of it. But they didn't get to keep copies. They were only allowed to view them and take notes. As a result, some committee members drafted a memo summarizing the facts they learned from viewing these documents. And on Thursday, the committee voted to make these memos available to all House members. That measure passed, but guess who voted against it. Yep. Every Democrat on the committee"     https://www.hermancain.com/every-intelligence-committee-democrat-votes

This is something many Americans have thought for a long time, including me and maybe you, too.  Quote: "The blackmail mechanism was put into gear the minute the news reported that the House Intelligence Committee had assembled proof that the FBI, DOJ, and DNC created Russiagate as a conspiracy to unseat President Trump. Members of Congress with nothing to hide demanded the evidence be released to the public. Of course, it was to be expected that release of the facts would be denounced by Democrats, but Republicans, such as Rep. Mike Conaway (R, Texas), himself a member of the committee, joined in the effort to protect the Democrats and the corrupt FBI and DOJ from exposure. Hiding behind national security concerns, Conaway opposes revealing the classified information. “That’d be real dangerous,” he said." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48637.htm