This bit of historical
truth arrived too late. But throughout his presidency his words,
behavior and deeds affirmed that he is a racist. It was so even as a
student per an unpublished manuscript Obama co-authored with a fellow
Harvard student. Quote: "A Pulitzer-Prize winning author says he
discovered material in an unpublished manuscript Barack Obama wrote
while in law school that was so damning it may have derailed his
candidacy for the presidency in 2008. In David Garrow’s new book, “Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama,”
debuting May 7, he found the former president was obsessed with
America’s racism, devoting some 140 pages to the subject with his
co-author and friend Robert Fischer. http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/obama-obsessed-with-americas-racism-new-book-shows/
This history is real no
matter what some people say. Way, way too much evidence exists. Quote:
"Public discussion of three current topics shows how ignorant most
Americans have become about religious questions that would have
electrified their ancestors. Pope Pius XII and Patrick Buchanan were
accused of pro-Hitler sympathies because their critics didn’t realize
that Communist persecution of Christians would take precedence, for
them, over all other considerations. And in New York, a tax-supported
art show stirred controversy because it featured a blasphemous picture
of the Virgin Mary, splattered with elephant dung; for liberals, as
usual, the only issue at stake was “artistic expression.” The great
vice of liberal thinking is its failure of imagination with respect to
Christians. For all their preaching of “sensitivity” and
“multiculturalism,” they are belligerently ignorant of Christian culture
and Christians’ feelings. In fact they seem to think that there is
something specially “artistic” about offending Christians. Offending
blacks, Jews, feminists, or homosexuals is “insensitive,” while
offending Christians is “irreverent” — a word that has come to suggest a
rather cute sassiness.
This is a bit
of interesting history of the not so reluctant Wilson's entry into WWI.
Quote: "Wartime Allied propaganda had Americans believing the Germans
were solely guilty, and that the conflict was a war for democracy, when
the most autocratic country in Europe, Russia, was on the Allied said.
American entry, of course, was a necessity. Revisionist history in the
twenties and thirties written by Barnes, Peterson, Borchard, Millis, and
other American historians seemed ironclad in making the case that the
United States was not “forced” to war, that American intervention led to
higher death totals and a settlement that in many ways unhinged the
world. In these works, Wilson’s decisions often looked misguided or
plain wrong. Yet from the late thirties, and with more momentum after
World War II, American historians fell back on a positive interpretation
of Wilson, the Man of Peace who was forced to War, with all the
ancillary propositions that followed. Again, from the early sixties, the
New Left historians — William A. Williams, Gabriel Kolko, Gar
Alperovitz, and others — resurrected much of the old revisionist
critique but with a more socialist and often Marxist spin. And a number
of historians and others, especially psychologists, wrote more critical
works about Wilson’s state of mind and his motives. But the picture of
the upright and moral Man of Peace struggling with the necessity of war
never disappeared in a long list of biographies, above all the Wilson
studies by Arthur Link. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/04/t-hunt-tooley/woodrow-wilson-finally-got-war/
What does the say to the
idea of Wilson's so called candor/honesty with the American people?
Revisionist history has distorted facts far too often to protect their
selected political hero's. But emerging facts disprove the
revisionist's handiworks An sexample. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/04/21/was-benjamin-freedman-telling-the-truth/
This item has a bit of a
tangential association with the previous two items. Quote: "Except for
the Cold War, conservatism has lost every battle it tried to fight. Some
it lost without even a fight, and it is now firmly on the wrong side on
race. Conservatives do not speak for us, and if we don’t speak for us no one will. Guillaume Faye believes that if the generation now in its 20s does not act, whites and their culture face oblivion. Even former Arizona governor Jan Brewer
says that Donald Trump may be our last chance to save America. Because
today’s conservatives have lost the will to conserve what most deserves
to be conserved–the founding stock that built this nation–they are
almost as dangerous as the left. Let us hope that many will join us as
their movement collapses. Whatever happens, it is remarkable that an
American college professor has published a book with a mainstream
academic press, in which he predicts not only the collapse of
conservatism as we know it but suggests that “the radical right” could
replace it. The sleeping giant is beginning to stir." https://www.amren.com/features/2016/05/what-will-replace-conservatism/
Quote: "The Donald Trump
of the 1856 presidential election was a celebrity explorer named John C.
Frémont, nominated by the recently founded Republican party. The
Hillary Clinton was a tired old perennial presidential candidate named
James Buchanan, chosen by the Democrats—although they had to dump
Franklin Pierce to do it. Pierce’s convention defeat marks the only time
in American history a sitting president has lost a campaign for
renomination by his own party. Meanwhile, the third-party spoiler
candidate of 1856 was Millard Fillmore, the retired former president who
found himself nominated by a party he hadn't much campaigned for, with a
platform he didn't much believe in. He accepted the nomination of the
American party, the "Know Nothings," anyway, and won 21 percent of the
vote in the November election. Frémont managed 33 percent and 114
electoral votes from New England and a fringe of far Northern states.
Buchanan cruised to a comfortable plurality, with 45 percent of the
national vote and a count of 174 in the Electoral College. And so the
dashing young celebrity and the amusing-himself former president were
turned away. The always-running workhorse of the Democrats took the
presidency—a job at which, despite his training as secretary of state
and ambassador to Great Britain, he proved a failure. Four years later,
in Buchanan's final months as president, the Southern states began to
secede and the Civil War arrived." http://freebeacon.com/culture/lincolns-pathfinder-john-fremont-election-1856-by-bicknell/?
Here's more on the USS
Liberty fiasco. Quote: "President Johnson was very quickly informed –
presumably by Defence Secretary McNamara – that the Liberty was under
attack and that the Saratoga had launched planes to go to its
assistance. Hence the order – from the President to the Defence
Secretary – to recall the planes. In Findley’s account the Saratoga’s
planes were hardly in the air when McNamara’s voice was heard over Sixth
Fleet radios, “Tell the Sixth Fleet to get those aircraft back immediately!”[xvii]
Initially, President
Johnson was – as Green put it – determined “that no U.S. aircraft would
be thrust into an adversary role with the IDF, whatever the implication
for the struggling U.S.S. Liberty.” Initially,
and for the usual domestic political reason – fear of offending Zionism
– this President was prepared to sacrifice the lives of 286 of his
fellow Americans on board the Liberty." https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/05/29/israels-attack-on-the-uss-liberty-the-full-story/ Unfortunately
these types of operations have occurred far too often throughout our
history. It serves as a warning that we cannot always trust our elected
officials. In my book no matter the circumstances this was murder,
pure and simple. Perpetrator consequences??? None. Is that okay???
No!!!
Interesting bit of British history which helps give us a feel for how cultural history evolves over time. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/05/15/orks-and-beakers/
This item extends the previous discussion and brings it into the eight years we have just endured. http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/soviet-union-goals-match-liberal-ideology/
A depressing bit of communism's history. https://fee.org/articles/how-communism-became-the-disease-it-sought-to-cure/
A history lesson. Unfortunately communism is on the rise, again. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/23/100-years-the-birth-of-socialism.html
This is history some revisionists do not want us to know. It is a true tragedy and we all need to know the facts. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/02/19/a-real-holocaust-during-wwii/#more-143609
No comments:
Post a Comment