In my earlier post, I explained that the Obama camp is
disingenuously responding to revelations that, during the presidential
campaign, the Obama administration conducted an investigation, including
wiretapping, against Trump associates and perhaps Donald Trump himself.
As I elaborated, one avenue of response is to conflate the Justice
Department’s two missions – law-enforcement and national security. We
can see this strategy playing out in the New York Times coverage of the
controversy.
According to today’s Times report, a Trump official said that White
House counsel Donald F. McGahn II is “working to secure access” to what
is believed to be “an order issued by the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court authorizing some form of surveillance related to Mr.
Trump and his associates.” Presumably, this means the Trump White House
is seeking to review the Justice Department’s applications for Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) surveillance of Trump associates,
and perhaps Trump himself, from June and October 2016, including any
orders issued by the FISA court – as my post explains, it has been
reported that the Obama Justice Department’s June application was
denied, but its October application (which apparently did not name
Trump) was granted.
The Times report continues (the italics are mine):
It would be a highly unusual breach of the Justice Department’s
traditional independence on law enforcement matters for the White House
to order it to turn over such an investigative document.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445506/fisa-not-law-enforcement-not-interference-independence-white-house-ask-fisa-info
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445506/fisa-not-law-enforcement-not-interference-independence-white-house-ask-fisa-info
No comments:
Post a Comment