Here is another example of the decay and promiscuousness being promoted in our secular progressive society. This example addresses our increasingly decadent public schools. Quote: "The policy also gives transgenders access to the locker room of their choice.
This is so radical as to have been unthinkable only the day before yesterday. And yet it’s happening in a quiet, old-fashioned Philadelphia suburb. I used to live right next to it. Gay is one thing, but transgender? Is it really the case that parents, especially parents of girls, don’t object? Do they agree with these policies, or do they just not care to complain? Feminists don’t care that biological males with greater body strength are putting biological women at a distinct disadvantage in athletic competition? Are we really adopting policies so radical to accommodate only 0.03 percent of the population? Yes, we are. And here’s the thing: the Springfield Township School Board may well be against all this, but the U.S. Government, under the way the Obama Administration has decided to apply Title IX, is not giving them a choice. " http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/transitioning-public-schools/
Can anyone tell me why the left goes crazy when Christians are protected from retribution like LBGT legal actions against them? Quote: Mississippi "Gov. Phil Bryant signed the "Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act” (H.B. 1523) yesterday, saying that the government may not compel religious organizations or individuals who have a sincere objection to take part in any homosexual couple's “wedding.” “I am signing H.B. 1523 into law to protect sincerely held religious beliefs and moral convictions of individuals, organizations, and private associations from discriminatory actions from state government or its political subdivisions,” Gov. Bryant said in a statement released this afternoon." And, "You’re not free if your beliefs are confined to your mind,” Fiedorek said. “What makes America unique is our freedom to peacefully live out those beliefs, and the Constitution protects that freedom.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/not-intimidated-mississippi-governor-signs-religious-freedom-bill?
This provides an example of progressive principles held by Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York and progressives/liberals generally and their hubris in standing up for transgender rights. You will likely find them to be hypocritical and totally irrational. Quote: And then of course Obama’s continual praise for Iran, a country that persecutes LGBTs, shows that he’s not motivated by a real compassion for the “transgendered”. There is an old saying that those the gods would destroy they first make mad. It alludes to the fact that hubris, pride, and the belief that men can change their own nature lead to actions that are mad when viewed in the context of reality. Yet what can be more insane than claiming that, merely by saying so, Bruce Jenner can become a woman? What a sexist affront to women! It’s unclear whether people like Cuomo actually believe in the insanity they endorse, or if they are simply cynically using the LGBT community as a battering ram to destroy the last remaining obstacle – religion -- to their grab for complete power over the American people. When confronting liberals spouting this sort of nonsense, make it clear that a man can no more declare himself to be a woman than a white man can declare himself to be black; science has taught us that both of those identities are written in our DNA. Then point out that people have the right to privacy and hence should not be forced to share a bathroom with a person of the opposite sex. While we can change how we act, we can’t change our biological identity; and public policy that ignores that truth can only lead to disaster and oppression." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/the_sexuality_lefts_real_enemy_is_christianity.html
This is background on secular humanist/progressive socialists efforts to destroy Christianity and ultimately our Democratic Republic. The whole methodology is rooted in the tactics of communist/socialist political doctrine/tactics. Quote: "Christians who apply their faith to the political arena are often described as “dominionists.” The claim is made that Christians want to use the power of government to have “dominion” over everyone. Ted Cruz has been described as a dominionist because he believes that Christianity has something to say to about this world. This is anathema to competing dominionists. Liberal religionists have been applying their religious beliefs to the political arena for decades, but they are never described as dominionists. Secularists apply their secular faith to every area of life, and yet they are not described as dominionists. Who runs the banks, Federal Reserve, pre-school through 12th, courts, most of the media, most law schools, the entertainment industry, and most colleges and universities? The secular dominionists are heirs of communist theorist Antonio Gramsci who argued that to change a society “would require a ‘long march through the institutions’—the arts, cinema, theater, schools, colleges, seminaries, newspapers, magazines, and the new electronic medium [at the time], radio." And, "The day may come when America, as an officially atheistic nation, decides to be consistent with its anti-God dogmatism perpetrated by dishonest and secularized lawyers in the name of the mythical “separation of church and state” dogma. If this ever happens, the restraining moral worldview of Christianity will no longer be around to stop tyrants who seek power for power’s sake. In that event, not even the secular dominionists will be safe." http://eaglerising.com/32404/fascist-liberal-secularists-are-trying-to-outlaw-christianity-in-america/ One only need to realistically survey the national landscape to see that evil anti-Christian/anti-American democratic republic secular forces are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams.
Ponder this in the context of the above items. Is this the kind of "progress" we want godless liberal/progressivism's socialistic egomaniacal elitists to impose on all aspects of our society and our culture? I don't think so. Without question their version of progress represents a regression into a past we never want to revisit! God help us if we accept their socialistic ideal of "progress" and its ever expanding restrictions on individual liberties. History unequivocally tells us that inevitably leads to disaster. Quote: "This “compartmentalizing of constitutional rights” reflects two things. The first is the separation-of-church-and-state mentality, which, nurtured in the soil of secularism, has evolved into the Separation of Church and Everything Else. Any serious Christian who receives serious teaching is taught that you’re obligated to be Christian in all things and at all times; you cannot, for instance, lie to make money because “it’s business” and different rules supposedly apply. Yet many may go to church one hour a week but then leave the premises and imbibe the same decadent entertainment, use the same language and indulge many of the same habits as everyone else. And just as their “religion” is confined to that 1/168th of a week, so has our civilization embraced the supposition that “religion” should be compartmentalized and not bleed into other affairs. In fact, informed by a relativistic worldview dictating there is no Truth and everything is merely a flavor of the day, many cannot even grasp how anyone could take faith seriously enough to apply it to everyday life. To these people, a worship service is some kind of bizarre encounter group, which they may be willing to tolerate, just barely, if it’s kept behind closed doors and out of their sight, as if it’s a sort of bathhouse." And, "The second thing reflected by this situation is that our Constitution has basically become a dead letter. When (mis)interpreting the document, judges, “picked out from the most dexterous lawyers…and having been biassed all their lives against truth and equity,” use “words multiplied for the purpose” to convince us “that white is black, and black is white,” as satirist Jonathan Swiftput it. Thus do they find protection in the First Amendment for pornography, but not for bakers who don’t want to service faux weddings. Thus do they find it constitutional for the federal government to compel citizens to purchase health insurance. Thus do they claim having an abortion is a matter of the “right to privacy.” And thus do they aver that faux marriage must be legally recognized in the name of “equal protection.” If the Constitution could take human form and speak, she’d say she feels used, abused and manipulated, betrayed time and again by those sworn to be faithful to her, scorned by an America that increasingly prefers the Siren of Secular Statism. She would want a divorce." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/_if_bakers_can_be_forced_to_service_faux_weddings_so_can_churches.html
Another view of the ever increasing sexual orientation rights trend trumping common sense. Quote: "Gender "reassignment" is the nation's trendiest cause, bolstered by the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision last summer, which struck down state prohibitions against same-sex marriage. So-called "bathroom laws" in various states are part of the pushback that should have been foreseen from the start. These laws ratify once-ordinary understandings of who visits which comfort facilities, never mind which sex they claim, irregularly, as their own. Similarly, the laws allow churches and private businesses to maintain long-normative understandings of who may marry. Florists and bakers, for instance, to whom the idea of a same-sex union is unwelcome, could escape legal liability for turning away the business of a same-sex couple. The idea of "choice for everybody" lies at the heart of the "bathroom laws." However, "choice for everybody" isn't what our liberal engineers have in mind. Their notion is choose their way: the street that goes in just one direction." http://townhall.com/columnists/billmurchison/2016/04/12/liberal-totalitarianism-n2147022? This is what is to come - the fact is that it already has. Idiotic actions cause idiotic reactions. http://patriotupdate.com/man-undresses-womens-locker-room-cites-states-gender-identity-law-knew-coming/? Need more evidence? http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/04/video_sexual_predators_take_advantage_of_transgender_laws.html
To put a wrap on this discussion consider this short piece of wisdom that puts leftist thought in its rightful place. Quote: "With the liberal, it’s always about working to disenfranchise one group while infusing another with virtue and privilege under the rubric of “fairness” so that they can finally and completely destroy the Bill of Rights and leave the left-wing elite alone to decide who gets what and why. So yeah, Hillary, I get it: the unborn or just born have no rights, just as Trump has no right to speak on a college campus, just as a Christian baker has no right to religious liberty, just as I have no right to the light bulb or toilet or immigration policy I prefer. Just as the blacks once had no rights, and the Southern Democrat slave owners had them all. I get it. A pox on you." http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/04/hillary_is_channeling_roger_b_taney.html
In summary, Washington, D.C. fails in almost everything it does. This is so because the progressive elites, either atheists or secular humanists, have dedicated their lives to the evils of progressivism/socialism, supporting special interests over the interests of all citizens, engaging in self serving financial gain with crony capitalist partners and engaging in unprincipled, grossly dishonest and unethical practices ultimately destructive to our nation's culture, history, morals, fiscal health and religious principles. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/washington_fails_at_everything.html
Wake Up America!!!!...
No comments:
Post a Comment