In oral arguments Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear the
government defend its kleptocratic behavior while administering an
indefensible law. The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 is
among the measures by which New Dealers tried and failed to regulate and
mandate America back to prosperity. Seventy-eight years later, it is
the government’s reason for stealing Marvin and Laura Horne’s raisins.
New Dealers had bushels of theories, including this: In a depression,
prices fall, so a recovery will occur when government compels prices to
stabilize above where a free market would put them. So FDR’s “brain
trust” produced “price stabilization” programs by which the government
would fine-tune the supply of and demand for various commodities. In
1949, this regulatory itch was institutionalized in the Raisin
Administrative Committee. Today it wants the Hornes to ante up about
$700,000. They could instead have turned over more than 1 million pounds
of raisins — at least four years of their production.
They have been refusing to comply with a “marketing order” to surrender,
without compensation, a portion of their production for the RAC’s
raisin “reserve.” The Hornes say this order constitutes an
unconstitutional taking.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/417121/why-government-stealing-raisins-honest-farmers-george-will
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/417121/why-government-stealing-raisins-honest-farmers-george-will
No comments:
Post a Comment