One way to evaluate presidential candidates is to follow the money.
To whom is a politician beholden? To what extent are her personal
financial interests at odds with the public interest? Which moneyed
groups is he unlikely to flout?
Republicans and Democrats have their respective (if sometimes overlapping) fundraising bases. Very rich individuals sometimes support a given candidate. And then there's Hillary Clinton, whose relationship to money is even more complicated.
Her family's foundation is one complicating factor. "The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration," the Washington Post reported last month.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/hillary-clinton-makes-it-hard-to-follow-the-money/388988/
Republicans and Democrats have their respective (if sometimes overlapping) fundraising bases. Very rich individuals sometimes support a given candidate. And then there's Hillary Clinton, whose relationship to money is even more complicated.
Her family's foundation is one complicating factor. "The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration," the Washington Post reported last month.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/hillary-clinton-makes-it-hard-to-follow-the-money/388988/
No comments:
Post a Comment