One
reason predictions of a Mitt Romney victory in 2012 were inaccurate,
say analysts, is that the turnout among certain Democrat constituencies —
in particular blacks and Hispanics -- was greater than expected. And
what a significant factor this is! Whether we call it getting out the
vote, having a great “ground game” or just turnout, it can make or break
an election.
But while the phrase “getting out the vote” is well understood, there is a lesser known election strategy: getting in the vote. What’s the difference? While the former involves getting as many as possible of the set number of sympathetic potential voters to the polls, getting in the vote is the process by which you increase that number of sympathetic voters. This process is most effectively exercised by Democrats, and it’s done in two ways. One is by indoctrinating people — especially young people — via academia, the media and entertainment. The second way is through immigration.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/08/immigration_the_ultimate_getoutthevote_drive.html
But while the phrase “getting out the vote” is well understood, there is a lesser known election strategy: getting in the vote. What’s the difference? While the former involves getting as many as possible of the set number of sympathetic potential voters to the polls, getting in the vote is the process by which you increase that number of sympathetic voters. This process is most effectively exercised by Democrats, and it’s done in two ways. One is by indoctrinating people — especially young people — via academia, the media and entertainment. The second way is through immigration.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/08/immigration_the_ultimate_getoutthevote_drive.html
No comments:
Post a Comment