"While
an equality of rights under a limited government is possible and an
essential condition of individual freedom, a claim for equality of
material possession can be met only by a government with totalitarian
powers." - F.A. Hayek
When
pundits and journalists talk about ideology, we get the impression that
they're maligning the people they disagree with and using ideology to
define an unfeasible dream that could never come to fruition. We hear
the word thrown around during political debates as a means to discredit
opponents and critics. The word is often used to end debates and declare
whoever uses it first the winner by default. The word is seldom
regarded as a positive description in modern political discourse. If we
accept this definition of ideology just for the sake of argument, it's
easy to conclude that the most ideological among us are those who
advocate income equality.
Nothing
is more unrealistic, unfeasible, and completely preposterous than the
idea of income equality. There is no way that all individuals with
varying talents and abilities could ever be equal. Furthermore, there's
no reason they should be. If you believe this, it doesn't make you
cold-hearted, callous, or evil. What it makes you is rational and highly
reasonable. Unfortunately, the world of politics is rarely rational or reasonable.http://www.poletical.com/income-equality.php
No comments:
Post a Comment