When Barack Obama took the oath of office, he agreed, before God and our
country, that he would "...preserve, protect and defend the
Constitution of the United States." In doing so, he also agreed to
Article Two, Clause Five of the Constitution which states that the
President must "faithfully execute the laws of the land". The word
"faithfully" in that statement is clearly defined by Webster's
Dictionary as "strict or thorough performance of one's duty." Faithfully
does not mean that the President can arbitrarily execute the laws of
the land. Nor, does it say he can ignore those parts of the
Constitution he doesn't like.
In our power-balanced system of government, only Congress has the right
to create or amend laws; and, once signed into law they become the
responsibility of that President and all future President's to
"faithfully" execute and uphold them. If, however, the law is somehow
unconstitutional, the courts can strike it down; but, not the President.
Therein lies the problem with a number of executive orders issued by
Obama. Especially those associated with the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
that he, himself, signed into law. If he didn't like the mandates of
the ACA, including the dates of implementation, he should have vetoed
it. That was his right under our Constitution. But, instead, by
signing it into law, he agreed to "faithfully" execute it.
http://cuttingthroughthefog.blogspot.com/2014/02/why-obamas-executive-orders-are-lawless.html