Is it time, after nearly 50 years, to gut the Voting Rights Act?
That’s the question the US Supreme Court is poised to take up in a case out of Shelby County, Alabama, in which local officials, backed by a bevy of Southern states, will argue that federal oversight of polling stations primarily in the former Confederacy is no longer necessary, and, is, in fact, itself discriminatory.
And while many Americans still believe the Voting Rights Act is important, those who want to put voting affairs back into the exclusive hands of state and local election officials have an unprecedented argument for abolishing it: The reelection of President Barack Obama.
True, Obama lost most of the so-called Section 5 districts and states, and it’s in the South that the Department of Justice cited the Voting Rights Act in challenging new voter ID laws that US Attorney General Eric Holder likened to Jim Crow era “poll taxes.”
Yet the election postmortems from both sides of the political spectrum have focused on a simple reality: Minorities in the US have enough voting freedoms to determine the leader of the free world, as they helped to do on Tuesday when blacks and Hispanics, especially, were seen as key elements in Obama’s decisive reelection.
That’s thrown the GOP into an ideological civil war over whether to drop its heavily anti-immigrant tone and consider full amnesty for millions of undocumented immigrants living and working in the US.
Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/1110/As-minorities-gain-electoral-power-Supreme-Court-asks-Why-the-Voting-Rights-Act
That’s the question the US Supreme Court is poised to take up in a case out of Shelby County, Alabama, in which local officials, backed by a bevy of Southern states, will argue that federal oversight of polling stations primarily in the former Confederacy is no longer necessary, and, is, in fact, itself discriminatory.
And while many Americans still believe the Voting Rights Act is important, those who want to put voting affairs back into the exclusive hands of state and local election officials have an unprecedented argument for abolishing it: The reelection of President Barack Obama.
True, Obama lost most of the so-called Section 5 districts and states, and it’s in the South that the Department of Justice cited the Voting Rights Act in challenging new voter ID laws that US Attorney General Eric Holder likened to Jim Crow era “poll taxes.”
Yet the election postmortems from both sides of the political spectrum have focused on a simple reality: Minorities in the US have enough voting freedoms to determine the leader of the free world, as they helped to do on Tuesday when blacks and Hispanics, especially, were seen as key elements in Obama’s decisive reelection.
That’s thrown the GOP into an ideological civil war over whether to drop its heavily anti-immigrant tone and consider full amnesty for millions of undocumented immigrants living and working in the US.
Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/1110/As-minorities-gain-electoral-power-Supreme-Court-asks-Why-the-Voting-Rights-Act
No comments:
Post a Comment