Democrats opposing gender ideology face prison for registering as 'Democrats' in Illinois: lawsuit

 A nonprofit group in Illinois named Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) is facing legal issues concerning its ability to register and solicit donations as "Democrats. " The group opposes the Democratic Party’s stance on gender identity issues, particularly in regard to minors, and argues its First Amendment rights are being infringed upon by state regulations.

1. Background of DIAG:

• DIAG was established to challenge the Democratic Party's policies that prioritize gender identity over biological sex.

• The group is concerned about medical treatments such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones being provided to individuals without sufficient scrutiny.

2. Legal Restrictions:

• Illinois has a law, known as the "party name provision", that requires nonprofits to obtain permission from the Democratic Party before they can register under the party name or solicit donations.

• This law was highlighted by Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, who has denied DIAG's applications based on this provision.

3. First Amendment Lawsuit:

• The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is representing DIAG in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state law, arguing that it violates the First Amendment rights of free speech and charity solicitation.

• DIAG has stated it does not want to ask permission from the Democratic Party, whom it wishes to critique.

4. Party Responses:

• The Illinois Democratic Party has not formally received a request from DIAG and states that the group's anti-transgender stance does not align with its values of inclusivity.

• Previous warnings have been given to DIAG and similar organizations in other states regarding their naming conventions, although no action was taken against DIAG in Colorado.

5. Support and Interest:

• Despite legal barriers, DIAG has reported a significant interest in its cause within Illinois, with more residents engaging with its donation page than in 42 other states.

• The group is effectively blocked from soliciting donations in Illinois but has observed a noteworthy level of support which it cannot tap into due to the current regulations.

DIAG's fight against the "party name provision" in Illinois raises significant questions about free speech and the rights of organizations to challenge mainstream party views. The outcome of their lawsuit could set a precedent regarding how nonprofit groups interact with political party regulations and the limits of free expression in political discourse. The case is currently pending in the courts, with DIAG seeking to have the provisions declared unconstitutional. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/free-speech/democrats-against-gender-ideology-face-prison-registering-democrats-illinois

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries: “We Intend to Proceed with Impeachment Proceedings if Kristi Noem is Not Fired” – Says Stephen Miller “Needs to go as Well”

 House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries announced that Democrats plan to initiate impeachment proceedings against Kristi Noem if she is not fired. This announcement follows the deaths of two individuals in violent confrontations with federal agents in Minneapolis. Jeffries criticized the handling of the situation by the Republican party and called for accountability.

1. Background on the Incidents:

• Two radical left activists, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, died during clashes with federal agents while allegedly participating in violent protests against ICE. Good was killed trying to run over an agent, and Pretti had a history of violent behavior.

2. Jeffries' Statements:

• Jeffries stated that Democrats will proceed with impeachment proceedings against Noem, claiming she presided over "cold-blooded killings" and criticizing her qualifications to lead the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

• He labeled her leadership as disgraceful and emphasized that she should be removed from her position permanently.

• Jeffries also targeted White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, calling for his removal and criticizing his past actions regarding immigration policies.

3. Response from Republicans:

• President Trump defended Kristi Noem, urging Republicans not to let Democrats dictate the terms and asserting that the party must stand firm against these impeachment threats.

• The tensions around the Department of Homeland Security funding are heightened, with deadlines approaching for the budget.

4. Schumer's Comments:

• Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer echoed Jeffries' sentiments, labeling Noem and Miller as "liars" and demanding defunding of DHS amidst ongoing negotiations.

The Democratic Party is prepared to take significant actions against Kristi Noem and others in the wake of controversial incidents involving federal law enforcement in Minneapolis. As the conflict intensifies regarding leadership in the DHS, both parties are positioned for a contentious political battle leading up to the November elections.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/watch-house-minority-leader-hakeem-jeffries-we-intend/ 

Maxine Waters Incites Violent Leftist Rioters in Los Angeles – Threatens ICE, “We’re Going to Fight You Every Inch of the Way”

 On January 31, 2026, Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) led a protest in Los Angeles against U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that escalated into a riot. Waters encouraged her followers to continue their demonstrations against law enforcement, resulting in clashes and multiple arrests.

• Protest Background: The event was part of nationwide “ICE Out Everywhere” protests, where demonstrators opposed the actions of ICE. The protests outside an ICE detention center in Los Angeles turned violent as anti-ICE protesters clashed with federal and local law enforcement.

• Incitement of Violence: Waters was seen at the forefront of the protest, urging her followers to rally and fight against federal officers. She encouraged protestors to remain on the street despite being warned that they were trespassing on federal property.

• Violent Clashes: Rioters were reported to have thrown objects at ICE agents, prompting federal agents to respond with pepper balls and other non-lethal measures. The situation intensified when a dumpster was set ablaze outside the ICE facility.

• Waters' Position: In various statements made during the protest, Waters insisted on the necessity of protesting against ICE, labeling them as a violent presence and asserting her commitment to fighting against their operations. She directed a message towards President Trump, condemning his immigration policies and stating her resolve to protect her community from ICE.

• Response to Violence: When questioned about the violent actions of protestors, Waters deflected by stating she had not witnessed such actions, while still advocating for “peaceful protests” as a constitutional right.

• Federal and Law Enforcement Response: In response to the escalating violence, President Trump directed Homeland Security officials to aggressively protect federal buildings and personnel, threatening severe consequences for anyone who attacked them.

The protests led by Maxine Waters in Los Angeles demonstrate a significant moment of civil unrest surrounding ICE operations. Waters' actions and rhetoric have sparked controversy, raising questions about the role of political leaders in influencing protest dynamics and the appropriate responses to civil disobedience. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/maxine-waters-incites-violent-leftist-rioters-los-angeles/

Venezuela Unveils Amnesty Bill For Mass Release Of Political Prisoners

 Venezuela's interim president, Delcy Rodriguez, has introduced a significant amnesty bill aimed at releasing many political prisoners. This marks a notable step in Venezuela's political landscape after a recent government change.

• The amnesty bill proposes to cover political violence from 1999 until now, with plans for an urgent vote in the National Assembly.

• There are currently around 700 detainees categorized as political prisoners, and the bill indicates that hundreds may soon be released.

• Rodriguez emphasized the need for healing and justice in Venezuela during her announcement, stating the bill aims to foster coexistence among citizens.

• The infamous detention center, El Helicoide, will be repurposed into a community complex, although the usual prison system will continue to operate.

• So far, about 300 prisoners have been released, with a focus on selective releases, including prominent critics of the previous regime.

The new amnesty law represents a significant shift in Venezuela's approach to political prisoners, potentially altering the landscape of the country's political dynamics moving forward. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/venezuela-unveils-amnesty-bill-mass-release-political-prisoners

Dear ICE Protestors: We Need to Talk

 Jenna McCarthy addresses the actions and motivations of recent protestors against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. She explores the implications of a hypothetical scenario in which protestors succeed in abolishing ICE and examines the realities of crime and public safety associated with such actions.

• Protest Actions: McCarthy acknowledges the dedication protestors have shown through rallies, chants, and signs while also noting their more aggressive actions, such as damaging property and assaulting officers.

• Hypothetical Victory: She asks the protestors to imagine winning their fight against ICE, urging them to consider what happens next. If ICE is abolished, McCarthy questions the plan for dealing with dangerous individuals who are in the community but not being deported.

• Public Safety Concerns: McCarthy highlights that many individuals currently targeted by ICE are serious criminals, suggesting that their removal is necessary for community safety. She argues that simply removing ICE does not address the larger issue of violent crime.

• Perspective on Crime: The article notes that while statistics may show illegal immigrants committing fewer crimes, the focus should be on the specific violent offenders who are in the U. S. unlawfully. McCarthy suggests that the presence of these individuals poses a continued threat to public safety.

• Historical Context: McCarthy emphasizes that immigration enforcement has existed under every administration, debunking the notion that it is solely a product of the Trump administration.

• Branding of ICE: She points out the negative perception of the ICE agency, suggesting that its name contributes to public sentiment against it. A more positively framed agency might receive more support despite similar functions.

• Call for Productive Activism: McCarthy encourages protestors to channel their energy into productive changes within the system, such as advocating for better regulations and oversight rather than calling for abolition of the agency.

• Consequences of Abolition: She warns that eliminating ICE could lead to dangerous offenders remaining in neighborhoods, potentially endangering families, and emphasizes the need for a balanced discussion about immigration enforcement.

Jenna McCarthy's article serves as a critical evaluation of the current protests against ICE, urging activists to reconsider their approach and consider public safety in their demands. She challenges them to propose realistic alternatives for dealing with violent offenders instead of merely opposing immigration enforcement as a whole. The piece calls for a more constructive dialogue about the complexities of immigration and law enforcement.

https://jennasside.rocks/p/dear-ice-protestors-we-need-to-talk?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1598754&post_id=186211600&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=r9734&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

New SNAP Work Requirement Rules to Start Feb. 1 in Multiple States

 Starting February 1, several U. S. states will implement new work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), affecting able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These changes, introduced by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed in July, aim to encourage employment among SNAP recipients.

• Individuals aged 18 to 54 who are ABAWDs must work at least 80 hours a month, participate in a work program, or combine work and work program hours to maintain benefits.

• Exemptions exist for those unable to work due to physical or mental conditions, veterans, pregnant women, and homeless individuals.

• Those who do not meet the requirements will lose their benefits after three months and must fulfill work conditions to be eligible again.

• The implementation varies by state; some may face immediate benefit loss, while others have a later deadline.

• Critics, including the National Skills Coalition, argue that these new requirements may punish individuals facing systemic barriers and increase administrative burdens.

• Advocates for the changes argue they are necessary to ensure that welfare programs support only those truly in need and to encourage self-sufficiency among able-bodied adults.

The new work requirements for SNAP are designed to incentivize employment among able-bodied adults. While supporters view this as a necessary reform, critics raise concerns about the potential negative impacts on vulnerable populations and administrative challenges. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/new-snap-work-requirement-rules-to-start-feb-1-in-multiple-states-5978982?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

Huge Verdict Could Destroy 'Gender Transition For Minors' Industry

 A jury found a psychologist and a surgeon liable for malpractice in the first medical malpractice case involving a detransitioner. The case centered around a 16-year-old girl, Fox Varian, who underwent breast removal surgery as part of her gender transition but later regretted the decision.

• Plaintiff Details: Fox Varian, now 22, was awarded $2 million in damages after the jury ruled that the healthcare providers failed to meet care standards in her treatment for gender dysphoria.

• Negligence Findings: The court found that Dr. Kenneth Einhorn (psychologist) and Dr. Simon Chin (surgeon) did not adequately assess Varian's psychological state or communicate effectively before the surgery, violating care protocols.

• Surgical Experience: Varian described extreme emotional pain and feelings of shame after the surgery. She expressed that her positive statements about the procedure earlier stemmed from the pressure to conform, a phenomenon known as cognitive dissonance.

• Defense Argument: The defense claimed Varian did not express regret about the surgery until she filed her lawsuit in 2023. They referenced earlier statements where she seemed satisfied with the results, but Varian clarified that these were efforts to project confidence while struggling internally.

• Critique of Medical Practices: The case highlights broader concerns regarding healthcare practices for minors in gender transitions, with critics noting that families often feel pressured into decisions with alarming consequences. Some argue that the studies supporting gender-affirming procedures lack methodological rigor.

• Parental Pressure: Varian's mother initially consented to the surgery due to fears of potential suicide risk if she did not, a common concern among parents of children facing gender dysphoria.

• Legal and Social Implications: This case is seen as a significant message regarding the treatment of vulnerable individuals in healthcare, particularly involving gender transition procedures. There are expectations of more legal challenges on similar grounds in the future.

The landmark decision in Varian's case sets a precedent that emphasizes the need for thorough evaluation and communication in medical practices involving minors and gender transitions. It raises important questions about the responsibility of healthcare professionals in such sensitive matters.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jury-awards-2-million-woman-mutilated-child-gender-affirming-doctors

Federal Judge Declines to Block Federal Immigration Enforcement Surge in Minnesota

 On January 31, 2023, a federal judge ruled against Minnesota’s emergency request to stop the Trump administration from deploying thousands of federal agents to the Twin Cities for immigration enforcement.

• U. S. District Judge Katherine Menendez stated that Minnesota did not provide sufficient evidence to support its claims against federal actions.

• Minnesota officials argued that extensive law enforcement operations lead to negative impacts on the community, while the Department of Justice (DOJ) focused on the importance of immigration enforcement for public safety.

• The judge acknowledged that while there are concerns about the potential harm from federal agents’ actions, the legal framework ultimately dictated the decision, favoring the federal government.

• The plaintiffs (Minnesota and its cities) suggested that a temporary restraining order was necessary due to rising tensions after incidents of violence involving federal agents.

• Menendez examined whether the Trump administration's actions violated the 10th Amendment, which protects state sovereignty, but concluded that Minnesota did not prove its case.

• The judge noted that federal agents are needed more in areas with sanctuary policies, indirectly criticizing Minnesota's stance on immigration.

Menendez's ruling reflects a complex interplay between state rights and federal enforcement of immigration laws, ultimately siding with the federal administration regarding Minnesota's challenge.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-judge-declines-to-block-federal-immigration-enforcement-surge-in-minnesota-5976732?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

Conservatism’s Case for Cheerful Realism

 Roger Kimball discusses the importance of adopting a cheerful and realistic perspective in conservatism, arguing against the prevalent pessimism within certain conservative circles. He emphasizes that a realistic worldview—marked by humor and acceptance of human imperfection—is essential for a healthy conservative movement.

1. Narrative Formation: Kimball reflects on how public opinion gets shaped, often from ill-informed opinions stated by influential figures. These can quickly become accepted truths despite being based on flawed premises.

2. Conservative Gloominess: Kimball has collected pessimistic articles predicting negative outcomes for conservatism and American society. He notes that while conservatives have historically produced dire literature, this tendency towards gloom is not typical of the conservative mindset.

3. Conservatism vs. Progressivism: Traditional conservatives differ from their progressive counterparts. Kimball argues that conservatives should typically possess cheerfulness, recognizing humanity's limitations without being disheartened. In contrast, some progressives are caught in cycles of disappointed utopian expectations.

4. Realism and Humor: Conservatives often hold a realistic view on humanity and enjoy humor. They do not take human imperfection as a moral failure and tend to celebrate current blessings while being cautious about grand reforms.

5. The Danger of Professional Gloom: A pervasive sense of despair among conservatives can stifle creative critique and satire. This negativity conflicts with the optimistic spirit traditionally found in conservatism.

6. Understanding Truth: Kimball emphasizes conservatives’ drive for truthful discourse. They prefer to label issues accurately, confronting ideas like affirmative action and taxation head-on, rather than accepting euphemistic language that obscures reality.

7. Value of Community: While concepts like "diversity" are prominent, Kimball argues that shared values and traditions should also be prioritized. Historical perspectives remind us that true community is built on common beliefs.

8. Caution Against Unforeseen Consequences: The essence of conservatism is rooted in acknowledging that actions often lead to unexpected and sometimes negative results. For instance, interventions intended to help can inadvertently create greater societal issues. This historical lesson is vital for conservative thought.

9. Reform and Its Implications: The article critiques the progressive notion that more reforms are the answer to problems, asserting that often these reforms magnify existing issues instead of alleviating them.

10. Cultural Resilience: Kimball references Matthew Arnold’s belief in a cultural safeguard, suggesting that within modern societies, there exists a "saving remnant" capable of pushing back against chaos and preserving order.

Kimball concludes that the current wave of gloominess in conservative discourse is contrary to its foundational principles. Emphasizing realism, humor, and community should guide conservatives to reconsider their outlook and strengthen their resolve against despair. The challenge lies in maintaining a positive, realistic perspective that reflects the true nature of conservatism and its ability to confront modern challenges.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/01/conservatisms-case-for-cheerful-realism/

Minnesota, the Land of 10,000 Lunatics, Turning Red This Year?

 Minnesota's unique political environment, highlighting its progressive history and recent shifts that could lead to Republican gains in future elections.

• Historical Context: Minnesota has a strong socialist influence due to its early Scandinavian and German immigrants. This history has shaped the state’s political landscape, favoring progressive policies.

• Current Political Climate: The Democratic-Farm-Labor Party dominates Minnesota politics, with notable figures such as former Governor Tim Pawlenty, who had moderate Republican leanings. Additionally, there have been trends of Republican leadership, though often short-lived.

• Recent Political Challenges: The state’s last Republican presidential win was in 1972, and since then, Minnesota has leaned heavily Democratic. Republicans face challenges from within, as seen when Pawlenty endorsed Hillary Clinton.

• Changes in Leadership: The Democratic control has faced recent scrutiny, particularly around issues like immigration and welfare. The GOP has managed to regain some power, notably winning a split in the Minnesota House, though Democrats have resisted attendance in critical votes.

• Impending Elections: With Democrats holding a fragile position, notably with Governor Tim Walz not seeking reelection, Republicans see an opportunity. The GOP's efforts have included cutting benefits for illegal immigrants and aiming for a broader legislative gain.

• Impact of Immigration: The decline in support for the Democratic Party has coincided with the changing demographics related to immigration policies, especially regarding the Somali population. This may affect the number of congressional seats for Minnesota, impacting the balance of political power.

• Future Implications: The article suggests that if Republicans continue to gain traction, they could reclaim significant power in Minnesota and potentially influence national elections, as Minnesota has historically been a pivotal state.

Minnesota's political climate has been volatile, with a historical propensity toward progressive policies. However, recent events indicate a potential shift towards Republican leadership, particularly with the upcoming elections. As the Democrats struggle to maintain their hold, the state's political future could significantly impact broader national trends. Republican success in Minnesota could indicate changes not only in state governance but may also influence presidential election outcomes, signifying a critical moment for both parties. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/01/minnesota-the-land-of-10000-lunatics-turning-red-this-year/

America's largest job cutter is also its largest visa importer

 Amazon has become a focal point in discussions about job cuts and immigration practices within the tech industry. Recent patterns reveal that while Amazon leads in layoffs, it simultaneously imports a large number of foreign workers, raising significant concerns regarding the treatment of U. S. workers and the genuine need for foreign labor in the current job market.

1. Layoff Statistics:

• Amazon has been responsible for the most layoffs in the tech sector since the pandemic, with a record cut of 30,000 employees on October 27, 2025.

• Cumulatively, Amazon has laid off approximately 65,000 employees, almost equal to its total workforce growth from 2021 to 2024.

2. Workforce Growth Analysis:

• Between 2021 and 2024, Amazon’s workforce grew by about 71,661 employees, primarily in roles eligible for H-1B visas.

• The company requested 115,607 H-1B visas during this period, which exceeds net job growth by over 43,000 positions, suggesting a strategy focused on visa acquisition rather than domestic hiring.

3. Demand for H-1B Visas vs. Job Creation:

• The demand for H-1B visas at Amazon significantly outpaces actual job creation. For every new professional job, Amazon sought roughly 1.7 H-1B visas.

• In the retail trade sector, where Amazon filed many visa applications, job losses were prevalent, indicating that these visas may be used more for displacing U. S. workers than filling skill gaps.

4. State-Level Context:

• In Virginia, a major hub for Amazon, the company was approved for 62,897 visas while the state added only 24,750 STEM-related jobs, pointing to a mismatch between visa approvals and local job growth.

5. Green Card Filings and Employment Practices:

• Amazon filed 21,012 PERM applications, claiming no qualified U. S. workers were available, even in fields with active applicants. This raises questions about genuine recruitment efforts for open positions.

6. Student Visa Employment:

• In 2024, Amazon hired 13,372 foreign workers via OPT and STEM OPT programs while simultaneously laying off U. S. employees. This indicates a reliance on cheaper, foreign labor rather than investing in the domestic workforce.

7. Collapse of Labor Shortage Claims:

• The combination of mass layoffs and significant visa approvals challenges the narrative of a labor shortage within Amazon's operational landscape.

8. Potential Consequences and Questions Raised:

• Federal scrutiny is likely as patterns emerge of mass layoffs coinciding with large-scale visa petitions, highlighting potential abuses of immigration programs. This could indicate an ongoing effort to replace American workers with cheaper foreign labor alternatives.

Amazon's recent employment practices demonstrate a troubling trend, where significant job cuts coincide with high levels of foreign labor importation. This reveals a possible strategy focused on cost control and labor dependency, undermining opportunities for American workers and questioning the integrity of the immigration system's intention to address genuine labor needs. The findings emphasize a critical need for reevaluation of hiring practices and immigration policy enforcement to ensure fair treatment of U. S. workers in the evolving job market. 

https://www.wnd.com/2026/01/troubling-americas-largest-job-cutter-is-also-its/

Missouri Sues To End Counting Of Illegal Aliens In Census, Wants Recount

 Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway announced a lawsuit against the U. S. Department of Commerce and the Census Bureau. The suit aims to end the counting of illegal aliens in the census and seek a recount of the 2020 Census and the 2021 congressional apportionment.

• The lawsuit challenges how federal representation is calculated, arguing illegal aliens should not be counted for electoral purposes.

• Hanaway stated that U. S. citizens, not illegal aliens, should determine congressional seats and electoral votes.

• The lawsuit claims that counting illegal aliens compromises fair representation and shifts federal representation from states enforcing immigration laws to sanctuary states.

• It highlights that policies allowing illegal alien counting go back to a decision made before the 1980 Census.

• The complaint includes historical context related to a Trump administration memo and subsequent Biden administration actions.

• The lawsuit is expected to be reviewed by a three-judge federal panel and seeks to declare the inclusion of illegal aliens unconstitutional, order a recount, and prevent future counting of illegal aliens in the census.

Missouri is taking legal action to challenge the inclusion of illegal aliens in census figures, asserting that this practice undermines the representation rights of its citizens. 

https://conservativebrief.com/sues-end-98538/

Mamdani's Cruel Homeless Policy: Frozen Corpses and Blighted Neighborhoods

 New York City's new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has implemented a controversial policy regarding homeless encampments that has sparked significant backlash from various community stakeholders. The shift away from closing down encampments has raised concerns about public safety and hygiene.

1. Policy Overview: Mamdani's administration is barring the NYPD from dismantling homeless camps, leading to a rise in visible encampments throughout the city.

2. Public Health Concerns: With winter temperatures dropping, several homeless individuals have died outdoors. Local officials express alarm regarding the spread of diseases like leptospirosis, linked to unsanitary conditions in encampments.

3. Neighborhood Impact: Residents have reported increased crime and a decline in public cleanliness, as sanitation workers are directed only to remove garbage and not other materials, leaving dangerous items behind.

4. Political Reactions: Many, including fellow Democrats, are outraged by the policy. City Council members have criticized the insensitivity toward both residents and the homeless individuals who are affected by the encampments.

5. Historical Context: The policy stands in stark contrast to the previous mayor, Eric Adams, who prioritized the removal of encampments to enhance public safety. This current approach has faced legal scrutiny, with a recent Supreme Court ruling affirming the rights of cities to remove such encampments.

6. Statistics on Homeless Crime: Analysis indicates that a disproportionately high percentage of crime suspects are linked to the homeless population, raising concerns about safety in neighborhoods with encampments.

7. Mamdani’s Justification: The mayor claims the approach aims to connect the homeless with housing solutions, though critics argue it neglects concerns for overall city safety and comfort.

Mamdani's policies on homeless encampments have ignited a heated debate about the balance between compassion for the homeless and the rights of community residents. The consequences include potential health risks and increased crime, raising serious questions about the effectiveness of this approach in improving the lives of homeless individuals while maintaining public safety.

https://hotair.com/betsy-mccaughey/2026/01/31/mamdanis-cruel-homeless-policy-frozen-corpses-and-blighted-neighborhoods-n3811399