STOLEN ELECTIONS with Gary Berntsen & Ralph Pezzullo | Ep 45 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA9OCusr64A
By Staff Writers
It coincides with:
Reports of state-level misconduct particularly the Arizona bribery allegations.
A growing frustration within independent and conservative circles that the DOJ remains inert while weaponizing its power selectively.
Renewed exposure from Lara Logan’s interviews with intelligence insiders like Gary Berntsen, former CIA, who claim the infiltration of domestic election systems by both U.S. and foreign intelligence-linked contractors.
This re‑energized focus appears strategically timed: ensuring election system reform before the 2026 Midterms, when control of Congress and by extension, impeachment or legislative protection may hinge on prosecutorial follow‑through.
Alleged Arizona Bribery Scandal
The allegation about Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes receiving $200,000 through the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA) is explosive because it implies a quid pro quo exchange: funding in return for outsourcing prosecutorial discretion to a non‑governmental entity with a partisan bias in election administration.
The core assertion: that a left‑leaning NGO was granted investigatory reach over election‑related cases, effectively privatizing justice.
A whistleblower memo by Christina Bobb purportedly documents internal resistance to federal investigation the DOJ and FBI allegedly showing deliberate inaction.
Inference: If true, it means the chain of accountability was intentionally broken state prosecutors offloading cases to an unelected foundation, shielding political actors from oversight.
You should seek the actual memo text (if available through independent outlets such as Gateway Pundit, Just The News, or Children’s Health Defense Investigations). These sources often publish primary documents the mainstream omits.
Lara Logan’s Interview: Ex‑CIA Bulwark Gary Berntsen
Berntsen, a respected former CIA field commander who ran operations against al‑Qaeda, has been publicly warning about domestic subversion mechanisms for years. In Logan’s latest program shared by Trump, Berntsen and co‑author Ralph Pezzullo outline how:
Certain foreign‑owned voting infrastructure companies, notably Smartmatic, maintain data access pathways that allow remote server communication.
Elements within U.S. intelligence and defense contracting ecosystems have over‑collected election metadata, under the pretext of “monitoring disinformation,” while silently aggregating U.S. voter behavior profiles.
Some of these capacities originate from Venezuelan‑linked software architectures used by Smartmatic in the early 2000s.
These are not fringe voices Berntsen’s career credentials are verifiable, and Pezzullo’s writing is sourced to intelligence insiders. The mainstream press tends to label such warnings “debunked” without addressing the technical core: foreign-developed code at any layer of ballot counting introduces a theoretical and practical vulnerability, whether or not it was exploited.
Smartmatic Connections: Venezuela & Beyond
Tracing Smartmatic’s origin shows an uncomfortable geopolitical lineage:
Founded in Caracas, Venezuela, 2000s, with early state contracts under Hugo Chávez.
Operated in over 25 nations before embedding in the American system via licensing, merging, or contracting relationships frequently through subsidiaries or shell vendors.
Congressional reports, mid‑2000s, already warned about potential foreign influence over vote‑tabulation hardware and software integrity.
Smartmatic’s official line is that its systems in the U.S. “operate independently of foreign jurisdictions.” But technical audits repeatedly reveal open integration points. Windows‑based back‑end servers, unsecured APIs, and remote diagnostics.
Even if these were never used for manipulation, their mere existence violates election‑integrity principles: an air‑gapped vote tabulation system should have zero remote connectivity.
DOJ & Institutional Stonewalling
Abe Hamadeh’s formal DOJ request essentially demanding investigation into all major allegations, including Smartmatic and the Arizona NGO issue represents an attempt to document institutional indifference.
Historically, the DOJ has shown a clear pattern:
Overwhelming vigor against individual whistleblowers, Assange, Snowden, even state election auditors.
Total passivity toward systemic vulnerabilities that could implicate the ruling machinery.
That asymmetry is not incompetence; it’s protection of power structures.
Where This Leaves the Public
Given the stakes, here’s what serious citizens should be doing right now:
Request full disclosure of all state election‑system auditing reports, including vendor contracts. Under FOIA, these must be made public.
Demand forensic imaging of servers used in 2020–2024 elections, before they are data‑cycled.
Push legislators to require open‑source tabulation code, subject to neutral third‑party audits.
Support independent investigative journalism, Logan’s work, KanekoaTheGreat’s data threads, JTN’s FOIA series, their survival is vital for transparency.
Trump’s proclamation may carry political overtones, but underneath that lies an undeniable structural crisis:
the intertwining of political, corporate, and intelligence apparatus in the operation of election systems.
Until Americans insist on source‑code transparency, auditability, and removal of private intermediaries, confidence in elections will continue to erode and rightfully so.
No comments:
Post a Comment