80 Years After Nuremberg Condemned Nazi Research, Doctors Are Still Committing Atrocities

 The 80th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials, emphasizing the importance of ethical standards in human experimentation. It critiques outdated definitions in U. S. regulations concerning human subjects in research, particularly those related to embryology, and argues for scientific accuracy to protect human life.

1. Nuremberg Code Significance: The Nuremberg Code was established after World War II to ensure ethical standards in medical research, focusing on informed consent and protecting vulnerable subjects from exploitation.

2. Outdated U. S. Regulations: The current U. S. law, 45 CFR 46, contains scientifically inaccurate definitions regarding human development stages, failing to acknowledge the embryonic stage while misdefining "fetus" and "pregnancy. "

3. Scientific Inaccuracies:

• The regulation states the "fetus" begins from implantation rather than fertilization.

• The embryonic stage, when essential organs and systems develop, is not defined, leading to ethical concerns regarding the treatment of embryos.

4. Implications of Misdefinition:

• Inaccurate definitions can lead to unregulated experimentation on human embryos.

• This may justify creating or destroying embryos for research, which challenges ethical standards.

• Misunderstandings about when life and personhood begin could enable future exploitation of vulnerable populations.

5. Embryology Facts:

• Human development consists of the embryonic stage (up to eight weeks) and the fetal stage (nine weeks to birth).

• Profound understanding of embryology recognizes that life begins at fertilization with the whole individual human being already existing.

6. Consequences in Research:

• Incorrect regulatory definitions can permit unethical experiments on embryos, including those created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) that are later discarded or exploited.

• Mislabeling products like abortifacients leads to confusion and misinformation about reproductive health.

7. Need for Reform:

• Accurate definitions are vital for protecting human life at all stages of development.

• Updating regulations would enhance ethical transparency, improve informed consent, and align scientific facts with law.

The article argues that outdated definitions in human subject protection laws perpetuate false beliefs about human development, ultimately eroding ethical standards in research. There is a compelling need for reforms that accurately reflect biological realities and uphold the dignity and rights of all human beings, from fertilization through all developmental stages. This would ensure scientific validity in research and protect against abuses reminiscent of past atrocities, underscoring the necessity for clarity and ethical integrity in human embryology regulations. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/11/28/80-years-after-nuremberg-condemned-nazi-research-doctors-are-still-committing-atrocities/

U.S. Comptroller who spent decades trying to shrink government has big ambitions for Trump

 David Walker, a former U. S. Comptroller General, believes President Donald Trump has a significant opportunity to reduce the size of the federal government. Walker points out that the government has grown too large and inefficient, leading to substantial debt. He suggests several strategies to achieve considerable budget savings.

1. Government Inefficiency: Walker criticizes the government for its size, excessive commitments, and lack of budget control. He describes it as “flying blind in mountains of debt. ”

2. Walker’s Background: He has a history of trying to eliminate waste and fraud within the government, holding positions related to Social Security and the Government Accountability Office from 1998 to 2008.

3. Plan for Trump: Walker presented a plan for Trump to significantly cut government spending, including:

• Fixing high-risk federal programs identified by the GAO.

• Using annual reports on improper payments to reduce waste.

• Streamlining agencies and programs based on duplication and redundancy reports.

• Mandating checks against the Social Security database to stop payments to deceased individuals.

4. Estimated Savings: He estimates that these initiatives could save "hundreds of billions" annually.

5. DOGE Efforts: Walker commented on the DOGE initiative by Elon Musk, stating it highlighted potential savings but lacked congressional follow-up to achieve real financial benefits. He emphasized that ending contracts or grants does not automatically equal savings; Congress must officially rescind funding.

6. Trump Administration Actions: In the current year, the Trump administration has canceled substantial contracts, saving tens of billions. Walker noted that Trump's broader plan includes seeking to eliminate the U. S. Education Department.

7. Focus on Entitlement Programs: Walker identifies significant savings within entitlement programs, such as Medicare and Social Security, by eliminating fraud and waste. He advocates for modernized data-sharing systems that can detect ineligible payments.

8. Need for Modernization: He stresses the importance of updating information systems to prevent fraud and improve efficiency, using Brazil as an example of a country with a consolidated system.

9. Constitutional Amendment Proposal: Lastly, Walker discusses the need for a Convention of the States to introduce a constitutional amendment that would constrain Congress concerning national debt relative to the economy and promote fiscal discipline.

David Walker believes by following his proposed strategies, President Trump can lead the charge in reducing government inefficiency and debt. Walker emphasizes the significance of data modernization, structural changes to federal programs, and constitutional reforms as crucial steps toward making government more accountable and sustainable.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/waste-fraud-and-abuse/sunus-comptroller-who-spent-decades-trying-shrink-government

America’s Industrial Backbone

The global situation is becoming more uncertain, with sudden economic and security challenges. To effectively face these risks, the United States needs to increase its resilience by enhancing domestic manufacturing capabilities.

1. Need for Resilience and Adaptability: The U. S. must be better prepared to respond to threats by innovating and producing goods within its own borders. A strong manufacturing base is crucial for both economic stability and military readiness.

2. Vulnerabilities Exposed: Past assumptions about the defense industrial base's ability to quickly scale have proven risky. The conflict in Ukraine highlighted the U. S.'s struggles to meet military supply demands, revealing weaknesses in industrial capacity.

3. Industrial Decline: Decades of offshoring and consolidation have weakened the smaller firms that produce essential components for the defense industry. This decline threatens America's ability to respond in emergencies.

4. Importance of Dual-Use Manufacturing: The solution lies in a modern approach to manufacturing that serves both defense and civilian markets. This allows for efficient production in peacetime and rapid scaling for defense needs during crises.

5. Investment and Collaboration: The federal government needs to partner with local manufacturers to develop advanced facilities that can pivot as needed. Policymakers must view domestic industrial capacity as a strategic asset rather than a side effect of procurement.

6. Call for Action: As attention turns to future defense budgets, both public and private investments should accelerate to rebuild the defense industrial base. The U. S. has the talent and technology to revive its industrial ecosystem with the right focus and investment.

To secure its future as a modern superpower, the United States must act quickly to rebuild its manufacturing capabilities, ensuring it can respond effectively to upcoming challenges. 

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2025/11/28/americas_industrial_backbone_1150112.html 

Westerners’ Abusive Relationship with Their Governments

 J. B. Shurk discusses the troubling relationship between Western citizens and their governments, particularly during the COVID pandemic. By reflecting on past government actions, the author suggests that citizens may be in an abusive relationship similar to that described by a mental health chart highlighting signs of abuse.

1. COVID-19 Government Actions: The author references an essay by a researcher known as “Sundance,” who argues that the government used COVID-19 to enforce totalitarian measures. This included restrictions on gatherings and personal freedoms.

2. Signs of an Abusive Relationship: Sundance’s essay includes a chart listing 15 signs indicating an abusive relationship, such as restricting personal freedom, controlling communication, and diminishing a person’s self-worth.

3. Examples of Overreach: The article describes several examples of governmental actions that reflect abuse, such as heavy policing of citizens during the pandemic and the enforcement of unproportionate COVID guidelines by political leaders like Gavin Newsom.

4. Ongoing Surveillance: The author warns that the government is expanding its surveillance capabilities under the guise of protecting citizens, including proposals for mandatory digital IDs in the UK meant to monitor citizens continuously.

5. Contradictory Justifications: The article notes inconsistency in government actions, such as blaming citizens for safety concerns while enacting measures that actually infringe on personal freedoms, and demonizing dissenting voices as selfish or crazy.

6. EU Monitoring: The European Union's efforts to monitor private communication in the name of combating child pornography are critiqued. The author argues that such measures are an overreach and indicative of a broader pattern of governmental abuse of power.

7. Media Censorship: The article expresses concern about plans in the EU to create a “Democracy Shield” to control information on the internet, which further erodes freedom of expression and promotes a controlled narrative.

8. Public Sentiment: Throughout, there is a recurring suggestion that citizens have been conditioned to accept authoritarian measures in the name of safety, thus perpetuating an abusive relationship with the government.

The article concludes by highlighting the two options for citizens in an abusive relationship with their government: either leave or learn to resist. The author emphasizes that many people feel trapped, noting that the oppressive actions of governments in the West may be more harmful than the perceived threats from other global powers.

In summary, the article calls for individuals to recognize the signs of this abusive relationship and advocates for vigilance and resistance against governmental overreach. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/11/westerners_abusive_relationship_with_their_governments.html

‘We Are Being Forced to Fund Our Own Destruction’: The Massive Amount of Taxpayer Dollars Behind Afghan Resettlement Program That Brought National Guard Shooter to U.S.

 Recent shooting incident involving two National Guard members in Washington, DC. The shooter, an Afghan national, was resettled in the U. S. through a program funded by American taxpayers. This has sparked debates about the implications of Afghan resettlement programs initiated during the Biden administration.

• Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot near the White House. Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, age 20, died from her injuries, while Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, age 24, is in critical condition.

• The shooter, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was resettled in the U. S. under Operation Allies Welcome (OAW), a program established after the U. S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021.

• Lakanwal had worked with the CIA and Afghan forces before entering the U. S. in September 2021.

• Since 2021, the U. S. government has spent over $14 billion on Afghan resettlement, with $8.7 billion allocated specifically to OAW through various government departments.

• Concerns have been raised about the potential threats posed by some Afghans resettled in the U. S., as mentioned by political commentator Mike Cernovich.

• Lakanwal’s resettlement was facilitated by World Relief, a non-governmental organization that receives U. S. taxpayer funds through USAID.

• Former President Donald Trump has called for a halt on migration from “Third World countries” and aims to reverse illegal admissions linked to the Biden administration.

• The shooting is seen not as an isolated event but part of a larger systemic issue surrounding the resettlement of Afghans, with over 72,000 Afghans resettled in the U. S., many with questionable backgrounds, potentially risking American safety.

The article highlights significant financial investments by U. S. taxpayers in Afghan resettlement programs and raises alarms about the potential dangers posed by individuals such as the shooter. The discussion emphasizes the need to reevaluate the current resettlement system, secure borders, and prioritize the safety of American citizens. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/we-are-being-forced-fund-our-own-destruction/

Did Wisconsin Democrat AG Undermine His Own Case Against Alternate Trump Electors?

 Recent legal proceedings involving Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul's office and its treatment of alternate electors from the 2020 presidential election. Critiques have been raised about whether Kaul undermined his own case by previously stating that the actions of alternate electors were legal.

1. Background of the Case:

• Wisconsin's alternate electors met during the 2020 election and were later charged with forgery and fraud by Kaul's office. This move occurred amid ongoing presidential campaigns leading to 2024.

• President Trump had pardoned several alternate electors, but the Wisconsin prosecutions were still pursued by Democratic prosecutors.

2. Conflicting Assertions:

• Kaul previously stated in December 2020 that alternate electors could legally meet and cast votes. He argued that there was no risk of their votes not being counted if a legal challenge changed the election outcome.

• This assertion has been used by defense lawyers as evidence that the charges of forgery against them are unwarranted.

3. Subsequent Legal Opinions:

• On February 9, 2022, Kaul’s office advised the Wisconsin Election Commission that the actions of the alternate electors did not violate any laws.

• The dissenting group, Law Forward, alleged that the alternate electors were committing fraud and forgery by attempting to claim official electoral status without being authorized.

4. Reactions and Legal Consequences:

• Legal experts, including defense lawyers for the alternate electors, argue that Kaul's previous wins legal backing cannot be ignored in the current cases.

• The case has extended beyond just legal implications, with suggestions that the Department of Justice should intervene due to the ongoing state prosecutions.

5. Recent Developments:

• Troupis, a key attorney involved with the electors, noted in his comments that Kaul's office had previously supported the use of alternate electors, raising questions about the legitimacy of current charges.

• In March 2024, Troupis settled a related civil case without admitting wrongdoing but agreed not to participate in alternate elections in the future.

6. Statements from Kaul and Law Forward:

• Kaul announced a criminal complaint against Trump supporters for participating in a conspiracy related to the alternate electors.

• Law Forward claims that previous opinions from Kaul's office were misrepresented by defendants, stressing that while some actions were not illegal, other possible violations remain.

7. Broader Context:

• Similar alternate slates of electors were formed in other states, leading to legal challenges there as well.

• The issue is complicated by potential federal law implications regarding presidential pardons and the nature of electoral processes, which some argue should not be subjected to state laws.

The ongoing legal disputes surrounding Wisconsin's alternate Trump electors reveal significant tensions between state and federal interpretations of electoral law. The actions and statements from the Wisconsin Attorney General's office raise questions about the legality of the electors' conduct and the political motivations behind the current prosecutions. Legal experts and affected parties continue to navigate this complicated landscape as the implications of these cases unfold in the lead-up to the next presidential election. 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/29/did-wisconsin-democrat-ag-undermine-his-own-case-against-alternate-trump-electors/

The United States of Delusion

 Buck Sexton discusses the phenomenon of manufactured delusion in America, explaining how continuous misinformation shapes public perception and belief. He illustrates this manipulation through the analogy of the Rocky Mountains and emphasizes its psychological effects on society.

1. Manipulation of Reality: Sexton argues that people can be led to believe in falsehoods simply through consistent exposure to misinformation from trusted sources. This repeated confirmation can lead individuals to defend their incorrect beliefs vehemently.

2. Mass Hysteria: The article identifies what Sexton calls "Manufactured Mass Hysteria" as a major concern in the U. S. today. He notes that many citizens accept false claims about significant national issues (like crime or education) not based on facts but due to their repeated acceptance by institutions.

3. Historical Context of Hardship vs. Insanity: According to Sexton, America has survived various hardships, but widespread delusion—encouraged by left-wing politics—threatens the country's stability. He connects this to historical totalitarian practices of propaganda and psychological manipulation.

4. Recent Violence as Evidence: Sexton highlights a recent assassination attempt against President Trump, attributing it to a product of years of propaganda and misinformation, which shaped an individual’s radicalized beliefs.

5. Trump Derangement Syndrome: He discusses how many people exhibit obsessive behaviors towards Donald Trump, driven by psychological distress caused by constant media narratives, likening it to mass psychosis.

6. Universal Psychological Breakdown: The author explains that this psychological manipulation is not limited to anti-Trump sentiments but also manifests in broader societal issues, such as climate change anxiety and gender identity debates.

7. Pattern Recognition: Sexton describes a systematic approach to how manufactured delusions operate—through emotional pressure, isolation from dissent, and punishment for questioning the prevailing narratives, which ultimately distorts people's views of reality.

8. Call to Action: He encourages readers to recognize these patterns in behavior and thought processes, emphasizing the importance of being able to distinguish reality from manufactured narratives to protect oneself and society.

9. Upcoming Book: Sexton announces his book "Manufacturing Delusion," which aims to explain the complete mechanics of this phenomenon and help readers understand how to defend against such manipulation.

Buck Sexton warns that the manipulation of perception is threatening to destabilize the nation and encourages readers to become aware of and resist manufactured narratives. He calls for personal vigilance to remain grounded in reality despite prevalent delusions and mentions the release of his book as a resource to navigate these issues. The understanding of how these processes work is crucial for restoring clarity in a time of widespread confusion. Preorders for the book, set to release on February 17, 2026, are encouraged to ensure widespread distribution and impact during crucial political times. 

https://dailyreckoning.com/the-united-states-of-delusion/

Obamacare’s Costly Illusion of Affordability: From Subsidies to Serfdom

 The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has increasingly been criticized for obscuring the true costs of healthcare. Recent events, including a government shutdown, have highlighted these issues, demonstrating the potential consequences of the ACA's structure on healthcare affordability and consumer confidence.

1. Rising Health Insurance Costs:

Since the ACA's enactment, health insurance premiums and the proportion of healthcare spending relative to the GDP have been on the rise. This surge in premiums has contributed to stagnant wages for workers, particularly those with employer-sponsored insurance.

2. Impact of Premium Tax Credits (PTCs):

The ACA established premium tax credits to help make insurance more affordable. However, these subsidies are set to expire in 2025 without congressional action. If they lapse, the Kaiser Family Foundation projects that premiums could rise by over 75%, raising concerns among consumers.

3. Employer-Sponsored Insurance Challenges:

Premiums for employer-sponsored insurance have also increased significantly. For example, the average annual costs for family coverage rose by 26% from 2020 to 2025, while employee contributions remain high and can suppress wage growth. Although employees may not see the full costs due to employer subsidies, healthcare inflation outpaces wage increases.

4. Profit Growth for Insurers:

Despite rising costs for consumers, the profits of major health insurers have surged by 230% since the ACA's implementation, leading to substantial earnings for top executives in the industry.

5. Economic Illustration of Healthcare Costs:

The article uses a pizza analogy to illustrate how healthcare costs are obscured from consumers. If employers heavily subsidize healthcare costs, employees may feel less inclined to budget appropriately, leading to overconsumption and increased prices.

6. Dependency on Government Subsidies:

The ACA's subsidies have created a dependency, with many individuals reliant on government support to afford healthcare. This reliance risks diminishing personal autonomy, as described by Friedrich Hayek in his work "The Road to Serfdom. " The increased enrollment in Marketplace plans reflects this growing dependency on subsidies.

7. Consequences of Subsidy Expiration:

The end of enhanced subsidies could result in drastically higher premiums, affecting millions of people who currently benefit from them. This could further isolate those who have become accustomed to low premiums, and threatening the overall structure of the ACA.

8. Long-term Implications:

The article argues that the system established by the ACA fosters an environment of dependency that could lead to increased government control over healthcare, reducing individual choice and freedom.

The ACA has created an illusion of affordability in healthcare through subsidies and employer-sponsored plans. However, the increasing costs and reliance on government support highlight potential economic pitfalls, including a significant rise in premiums if subsidies expire. As individuals become more dependent on these government programs, concerns arise regarding personal freedom and the sustainability of the healthcare system. 

https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/from-subsidies-to-serfdom-obamacares-costly-illusion-of-affordability/

'Self Deport' Or Else: DHS Guts Biden's Haitian Invasion Pipeline

 The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced changes regarding the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian nationals living in the United States. This decision aims to prioritize U. S. national interests over immigration policies that have come under scrutiny.

• DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stated that Haiti's condition no longer warrants U. S. taxpayer-funded assistance, meaning Haitian nationals may need to leave.

• The current number of Haitians in the U. S. is estimated at around 352,959, but only about 18,000 are lawful permanent residents.

• The TPS program is criticized for attracting illegal immigrants, undermining U. S. immigration policy.

• The DHS encourages Haitians to self-deport using the CBP Home app, which offers a $1,000 exit bonus and a plane ticket.

• Ongoing legal disputes challenge the TPS program, with recent Supreme Court rulings affecting immigration policy.

• Concerns have been raised regarding public safety and national security due to difficulties in assessing the backgrounds of immigrants.

• Current media narratives present Haitians as a focal point in the upcoming elections, reflecting growing tensions around immigration.

The DHS's stance represents a significant shift in how Haitian immigrants are treated under U. S. law, emphasizing a strong focus on national security and immigration control while providing options for voluntary departure.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/self-deport-or-else-dhs-guts-bidens-haitian-invasion-pipeline

Documents Stuffed Into Burn Bags at FBI Headquarters to Be Made Public: Kash Patel

 FBI Director Kash Patel shared details about sensitive documents found in burn bags at FBI headquarters, indicating that all such documents will be made public.

• Patel stated in an interview that all materials found in the burn bags would be disclosed through investigations, public trials, or to Congress.

• Before his role as FBI director, Patel was a congressional investigator for the House Intelligence Committee during the investigation of possible Russian connections with President Trump’s 2016 campaign, known as “Russia Gate. ”

• He mentioned that the burn bags contained files related to the investigation, including a declassified annex from former special counsel John Durham.

• This annex revealed that the FBI did not thoroughly assess information suggesting the Clinton campaign may have created a false narrative about Trump and Russia.

• Patel equated the use of burn bags with destroying classified documents and implied that certain government entities tried to hide crucial information.

• He emphasized that, following Trump’s election, there has been a concerted effort to uncover corruption within law enforcement.

• Patel assured that there would be accountability and transparency about the investigations into the FBI’s actions regarding Trump and other related matters.

Patel’s comments highlight ongoing efforts to expose and make accessible sensitive information related to high-profile investigations intertwining political figures and the FBI’s actions.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/documents-stuffed-into-burn-bags-at-fbi-headquarters-to-be-made-public-kash-patel-5950251?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

The Two Calls to the Pacific: President Trump Unravels the Myth of a Special US-China Relationship

 President Donald Trump recently made two significant phone calls to Chinese General Secretary Xi Jinping and Japanese Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae. This move has reshaped the U. S.-China relationship and repositioned Japan as a main player in U. S. strategy regarding China.

1. Historic Phone Calls: Trump's calls on November 24 marked an unprecedented shift in U. S. diplomatic strategy, challenging the long-held belief in a special US-China relationship that has existed since 1979, which often sidelined U. S. allies in the region, particularly Japan.

2. The Myth of The Relationship: This longstanding perspective views the U. S. and China as partners, cultivated by various previous U. S. administrations. However, Trump's actions have begun to dismantle this narrative, elevating Japan’s role in countering China's military aggressions.

3. Security Concerns Over Taiwan: The backdrop of these discussions is the increasing threat posed by China towards Taiwan, which has serious implications for Japan's national security. As China continues to expand its military capabilities, Japan's vulnerability became a focal point in discussions, especially after PM Takaichi expressed Japan's concerns regarding a potential invasion of Taiwan.

4. Trump’s Commitment to Allies: Following recent tensions from China, including threats against Japan and military parades meant to intimidate, Trump reaffirmed America's commitment to Japan. The joint visit to the USS George Washington and subsequent calls were strong indications that the U. S. views Japan as a critical ally in addressing the challenges posed by China.

5. CCP's Aggressive Stance: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has ramped up propaganda and threats against Japan, reflecting its opposition to Japan's increasing defense posture under PM Takaichi. Despite this, she has remained resolute and has not backed down from her position regarding Taiwan's security implications.

6. The Shift in Diplomatic Strategy: Trump’s calls signal a departure from past approaches, including a strong indication that he aims to challenge China directly rather than allowing the relationship to overshadow U. S. alliances. This marks a strategic move towards building a united front with Japan against Chinese aggression.

7. Global Implications: These developments have raised concerns within China, as Xi Jinping must now consider the implications of American support for Japan in future diplomatic engagements. The new dynamic may also result in a more coordinated approach to security in the Asia-Pacific region.

President Trump's recent phone calls represent a significant turning point in U. S.-China relations, marking a return to prioritizing allied partnerships, particularly with Japan. By challenging the previous narrative of a unique U. S.-China relationship, Trump has begun to reshape security dynamics in the region, signaling a tougher stance against China's expansionist ambitions. Japan's alignment with the U. S. against Chinese threats reinforces the importance of this alliance in maintaining regional stability. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/11/30/the-two-calls-to-the-pacific-president-trump-unravels-the-myth-of-a-special-us-china-relationship/

The FDA Memo That Shakes the World

 A memo from Dr. Vinay Prasad, the head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, has raised significant concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding children's health. The memo indicates that at least 10 children have died after receiving the vaccine, which could prompt a reevaluation of the U. S. vaccine program.

1. Deaths Linked to Vaccination:

• Dr. Prasad reports that the FDA has verified at least 10 child deaths related to COVID-19 vaccinations. This number is believed to be an underestimate due to underreporting.

• The memo asserts that these deaths are significant and warrant immediate attention and reevaluation of vaccine policies.

2. Previous Acknowledgments:

• Prior to this memo, concerns about vaccine-induced myocarditis, particularly in young boys, were raised but not thoroughly acknowledged by health authorities, including the FDA and CDC.

• The memo brings attention to the delayed recognition of safety signals that could have affected vaccine recommendations for children.

3. Focus on Risk vs. Benefit:

• Dr. Prasad questions whether vaccines have saved more children's lives than they have harmed. He highlights the lack of reliable data to determine the true benefits of vaccinating children against COVID-19.

• The memo calls for a more rigorous assessment of the risks associated with vaccination compared to the risks posed by COVID-19 in children.

4. Concerns About Reporting:

• The vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) is acknowledged as being underutilized, leading to a potential underreporting of adverse effects.

• The memo emphasizes the challenges in assessing causality in case reports, which complicates understanding the true impact of vaccines.

5. Calls for Systemic Changes:

• Dr. Prasad expresses a need for introspection and reform within the FDA. He suggests that the systematic review of vaccine safety signals should be prioritized over historical practices.

• The memo advocates for evidence-based regulations regarding vaccines and calls for randomized clinical trials to provide clearer data on vaccine safety and efficacy.

6. Response to Public Opinion:

• There are concerns regarding the leaking of FDA information to the media, which could distort public perception of vaccine safety.

• Dr. Prasad stresses the importance of maintaining confidence in the vaccine regulatory process while addressing public concerns honestly.

7. Future Direction for FDA:

• The memo outlines a new direction for the FDA, advocating for improved methods of assessing vaccine risks and benefits.

• Dr. Prasad plans to revise current frameworks for approving vaccines and ensure that they are subjected to stringent evidence-based practices.

This memo from Dr. Vinay Prasad represents a critical turning point in the ongoing conversation about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for children. It raises essential questions about the balance between the benefits of vaccination and the potential risks, calling for a substantial reevaluation of current vaccine mandates and policies. The document reflects an urgent need for systemic changes within the FDA to ensure that vaccine safety is prioritized and transparently communicated.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-fda-memo-that-shakes-the-world/

Will Trump’s autopen executive order de-bench 237 leftist federal judges (including Ketanji Brown Jackson)?

 On November 29, 2025, an article by Andrea Widburg discusses former President Donald Trump's recent executive order regarding documents signed by President Joe Biden using an Autopen. The order has significant implications, especially concerning judicial nominations, including that of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

1. Trump's Executive Order: Trump issued a statement declaring all documents signed by Joe Biden using an Autopen as void. He claims that nearly 92% of Biden's documents fall into this category, stating they are invalid without his personal approval.

2. Judicial Appointments at Risk: The article highlights that voiding the Autopen signatures could impact Biden’s judicial nominees, particularly the 235 judges appointed during Biden's term. Many of these appointments are argued to be more about diversity than qualifications.

3. Legal Context: The article references historical statutes that require judicial commissions to be signed personally by the president. Past Supreme Court rulings, such as Marbury v. Madison, reinforce the importance of signed commissions in granting authority.

4. Impact on Justice Jackson: A specific concern is raised about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's position, as her commission might be challenged under Trump's order. This situation could lead to her losing her seat on the Supreme Court.

5. Accusations of a "Shadow Government": Trump characterizes the Autopen situation as a scandal, accusing Biden’s aides of manipulating the presidency. He argued that Biden's mental capacity is in question, suggesting that it was aides who were operating the Autopen, not Biden himself.

6. Potential Supreme Court Involvement: The matter is expected to reach the Supreme Court. As Jackson would need to recuse herself due to her involvement, the remaining conservative justices may face pressure to rule in favor of Trump's order against the backdrop of legal standards.

7. Conservative Justices' Approach: The article notes that although a conservative majority exists, justices often take cautious approaches, which may complicate Trump’s plans to invalidate the Autopen signatures.

Trump's executive order to void documents signed by Biden with the Autopen raises significant legal and political questions, specifically regarding the status of Biden's judicial appointments, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. While the argument has garnered attention, it faces potential hurdles if it proceeds to the Supreme Court, where justices might navigate the complexities carefully rather than follow political inclinations. The situation is poised for considerable developments in the legal and political landscape. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/11/will_trump_s_autopen_executive_order_de_bench_237_leftist_federal_judges_including_ketanji_brown_jackson.html

Is Civil War Inevitable?

 Recent political events and the implications of immigration in America, focusing on the tensions between traditional American values and the influences of new immigrants, particularly from Afghanistan. It raises concerns about the potential for civil unrest and the changing dynamics of American society.

1. Black Friday Offer: An invitation to join a special offer related to Black Friday is highlighted, though the details are not provided within the context.

2. Political Commentary on Immigration:

• A CNN reporter's commentary suggests challenges surrounding Afghan immigrants and their integration into American society.

• There is a critique of the Biden administration's management of Afghan immigrants, underscored by a shooting involving a suspect linked to these groups.

3. Historical Context of Immigration:

• The author contrasts historical waves of immigration, particularly from Europe, with current trends. The former group sought freedom and assimilated into American culture, while the latter is viewed as more divisive.

• Concerns are raised regarding individuals within the newer immigrant groups who allegedly harbor animosity towards America.

4. Democratic Party's Role:

• The piece contends that the Democratic Party promotes divisiveness within the country for political gain, likening this strategy to historical patterns of leftist movements gaining power through turmoil.

• It suggests that strengthening control over diverse groups will lead to a system akin to a totalitarian regime.

5. Possibility of Civil War:

• The article expresses fear that America could face a civil war, drawing parallels with historical examples where Marxist regimes gained power through conflict.

• This fear is tied to a belief that the left seeks to dismantle traditional American frameworks and values.

6. Cultural Cohesion vs. Diversity:

• The author references historian Will Durant’s observations about empires disintegrating due to internal diversity and lack of cohesion.

• The argument is made that for a society to remain united, assimilation to common values must occur rather than fostering divisions based solely on diversity.

7. Call to Action for Traditional Values:

• There is a strong call for America to reconnect with its foundational principles to avoid disintegration, warning that failure to do so could lead to the country losing its greatness.

8. Final Thoughts on Coexistence:

• The text poses questions about the sustainability of coexistence among groups that harbor mutual disdain and suggests that peaceful unity requires shared values rather than imposed diversity.

The commentary presents a dire perspective on the current political situation in the United States, particularly regarding immigration and societal cohesion. It warns of potential chaos stemming from a lack of shared ideals and the threat of authoritarianism disguised as progressive values. The author advocates for a return to the principles that historically unified the nation. 

https://townhall.com/columnists/marklewis/2025/11/28/is-civil-war-inevitable-n2667122

Venezuela's Maduro has his own Jill Biden and a coven of communist hags surrounding him

 The political influence of Cilia Flores, Nicolás Maduro’s wife, in the Venezuelan government. It portrays her as a significant power player in Venezuela’s troubled political landscape, challenging the perception of her as merely a supportive spouse.

1. Cilia Flores’ Political Role: Despite her public image as a caring grandmother, Cilia Flores plays a critical role in Venezuelan politics. She is the head of the civilian wing of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), making her a powerful figure alongside Maduro.

2. Historical Context: Cilia Flores has been involved in Venezuelan politics since the early days of Hugo Chávez. She has held various important positions such as congresswoman, comptroller general, and president of the National Assembly, demonstrating her longstanding influence.

3. Personal Connections: Cilia is linked to notorious events, including her sons’ involvement in a major drug trafficking case. They were arrested for trying to smuggle drugs into the United States but were released as part of a diplomatic exchange led by the Biden administration.

4. Nepotism and Corruption: The article highlights Cilia’s alleged use of her position to place family and allies in key government roles, marking a pattern of nepotism within the Venezuelan government. Cilia is described as both politically savvy and ruthless in her dealings.

5. Public Perception and Identity: Cilia projects a dual identity: the gentle grandmother and the powerful political figure, earning her the nickname "the red witch" among locals. Her leadership style combines public charm with strategic maneuvering.

6. Broader Political Implications: The piece emphasizes the need to address not just Maduro’s regime but the entire network of women in power who contribute to Venezuela's crisis. This “coven” of powerful women includes other prominent figures who have facilitated the regime's corruption and mismanagement.

7. Call to Action: The article advocates for accountability and justice for Cilia Flores and her associates, arguing they cannot escape scrutiny along with Maduro. The text implies a need for significant political change in Venezuela.

The article paints a complex picture of Cilia Flores, challenging traditional views of female political figures in authoritarian regimes. It underscores the deeply entrenched system of corruption in Venezuela and calls for a comprehensive approach to reform that holds all responsible parties accountable, not just the male leader, Maduro. The author argues that as changes are underway in Venezuela, the focus should include the powerful women assisting him, who must also face justice for their roles in the country's turmoil. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/11/venezuela_s_maduro_has_his_own_jill_biden_and_a_coven_of_communist_hags_surrounding_him.html

What the US Senate Should Say

 The Brownstone Institute discusses the need for a resolution from the US Senate to address the consequences of COVID-19 response measures. There is a push from various groups for a formal acknowledgment of the missteps taken during the pandemic.

1. Need for Accountability: There is a call for an official voice to articulate the societal distress caused by pandemic policies.

2. Senate Resolution Proposal: A potential Senate resolution aims to repudiate harmful emergency measures taken during the pandemic and lay down principles for future public-health emergencies.

3. Mistakes Identified: The resolution drafts a list of mistaken actions during the pandemic, such as:

• School closures that harmed educational and mental health outcomes for children.

• Restrictions on non-essential businesses without proper justification.

• Forceful mask mandates lacking respect for bodily autonomy.

• Stay-at-home orders that restricted healthy individuals unduly.

• Restrictions affecting access to medical services beyond emergency needs.

• Dismissal of therapeutics and policies that disrupted property rights and contractual agreements.

4. Protection of Rights: The resolution emphasizes that constitutional rights should remain intact during emergencies, arguing against vaccine mandates and censorship.

5. Future Guidelines: It proposes principles for managing future public-health emergencies, such as:

• Emergency declarations should be time-limited and require congressional reauthorization beyond 30 days.

• No penalties or mandates should impact the public without legislative approval.

• Schools and places of worship should maintain operational status unless strict criteria are met.

• Transparency in data and modeling used for public health decisions.

• Compensation for businesses impacted by government orders.

6. Call for State Cooperation: The Senate urges states to adopt similar principles to ensure consistent policies across the country.

7. Acknowledgment of Suffering: The resolution conveys regret for the hardships faced by Americans during the pandemic due to misguided policies.

The proposed resolution serves both as a cautionary tale and a guiding document for future pandemic responses, aiming to avoid repeating past mistakes and protect individual freedoms. The Senate is being urged to formally recognize the lessons learned and ensure such incidents do not repeat to the detriment of civil liberties.

https://brownstone.org/articles/what-the-us-senate-should-say/

DOJ Employee Arrested, Booked on Terrorism and Evidence Tampering Charges For Doxxing Federal Agent

A Department of Justice (DOJ) employee, Karen Olvera De Leon, was arrested for her involvement in doxxing a federal agent during a live stream of a raid in Brownsville, Texas. This incident raises concerns regarding the safety of law enforcement officials and the increasing risks they face.

• Incident Overview: On June 9, 2025, during a federal operation in Cameron County, a live stream captured the event. A male viewer issued a death threat against one federal agent involved in the raid. Karen Olvera De Leon participated in the livestream and disclosed the agent’s identity to the individual making the threat.

• Charges: Following the incident, Olvera De Leon was arrested and charged with terrorism and tampering with or fabricating evidence. She was booked on these charges and later released on a $20,000 bond.

• Government Response: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) condemned the act of doxxing, highlighting a significant rise in threats against federal law enforcement officers and their families. The DHS reported an alarming increase in violence, stating that officers face over a 1000% rise in assaults. The Assistant Secretary of DHS emphasized that officers put their lives at risk daily to ensure community safety.

• Call to Action: The news release included information on how individuals can report doxxing or harassment against ICE officers, including a contact number and online tip form.

The arrest of Karen Olvera De Leon underscores serious issues within the DOJ and the dangers faced by federal agents in their line of work. The increase in threats and violence against law enforcement officials highlights the need for action to protect those who serve and keep communities safe. The DHS encourages the public to report any anti-officer harassment to help combat this troubling trend. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/doj-employee-arrested-booked-terrorism-evidence-tampering-charges/

China Deploys World’s First Commercial Supercritical CO2 Power Generator

 China has launched the world’s first commercial power unit that uses supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO₂) technology, marking an advance in clean energy. Developed by the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), this system replaces traditional steam with high-pressure CO₂ to convert waste heat from steel production into electricity.

• The initial setup is at the Shougang Shuicheng Steel complex in Guizhou, utilizing two 15-megawatt units connected to the grid.

• This technology is expected to be 50% more efficient than conventional steam-based systems.

• It operates on a Brayton-cycle loop, enhancing energy conversion efficiency beyond 50% while minimizing the size of turbines and components.

• The technology can harness the high temperatures from steel sintering and has potential applications in advanced nuclear reactors and solar power systems.

• The project has been in development for over ten years, achieving full-power laboratory operation in 2019.

In addition, similar sCO₂ projects are being tested globally, such as one in Texas supported by the US Department of Energy.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/china-deploys-worlds-first-commercial-supercritical-co2-power-generator

Destroying Civilization

Lars Møller discusses the extensive demolition of British architecture after World War II, arguing that it reflects a cultural loss rather than a necessary evolution. The essay highlights the consequences of prioritizing modernity over historical preservation, claiming that this mindset has led to a decline in cultural identity.

1. Destruction during the War:

• The Luftwaffe bombs of 1940-41 led to the destruction or damage of half a million British homes and historic city centers.

2. Misguided Reconstruction Efforts:

• Following the war, reconstruction was characterized by campaigns that prioritized modernity, progress, and slum clearance, resulting in the demolition of significant pre-1914 buildings.

• Key cities like Coventry and Plymouth replaced their historic architectures with concrete designs that lacked cultural sensitivity.

3. Loss of History and Identity:

• The widespread demolition caused more loss of historic buildings than the war itself, leading to a cultural and aesthetic crisis.

• Traditional architectures were deemed "reactionary" and "sentimental," and planners pushed for new developments that disregarded the past, effectively erasing collective memory.

4. Motivation Behind Demolitions:

• The driving forces behind these demolitions were profit and professional ambition, not merely the need for housing after the war.

• The local authorities, eager for modernization, often ignored the value of preserving the old structures.

5. Cultural Consequences:

• The loss of significant buildings leads to a disconnection from one’s heritage, where citizens feel like nomads in their own land.

• The post-war generation began to view their history as something shameful, contributing to a broader narrative of nihilism and self-criticism.

6. Ideological Shift:

• The destruction of historic landmarks signified a societal shift that undervalued the past and justified the erasure of cultural roots.

• This mindset intensified with the teaching of history as a story of shame rather than pride.

7. Impact on Future Generations:

• The young people raised in rebuilt, emotionless environments lack a sense of belonging, making them susceptible to negative narratives about their national identity.

• There is a concern that this will result in an irreversible loss of cultural pride and historical understanding.

8. A Call to Action:

• Møller argues for the need to restore appreciation for beauty and historical integrity in architecture.

• There is a need for new generations to advocate for the preservation of cultural heritage in order to reclaim a sense of identity and value in their civilization.

Møller concludes that the post-war urban transformations reflect a surrender to modernism at the expense of long-standing cultural heritage. He stresses the importance of fostering a respect for beauty and history to prevent a complete cultural extinction, warning that failing to do so will lead to irreparable loss and disconnection from one’s past. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/11/destroying_civilization.html

War Dept. Battles Internal Resistance To Reinstate 86 Soldiers Ejected By Covid Shot Mandate

 Recent developments in the military have raised significant attention regarding the reinstatement of soldiers who were dismissed due to Covid-19 vaccination mandates from the Biden administration. The efforts led by the Trump administration aim to reinstate these service members, but progress has been slow and met with challenges.

1. Current Status of Reinstatements

• After ten months since President Trump’s order for full reinstatement of voluntarily dismissed military personnel, only 86 soldiers have been reinstated out of 617 applicants.

• This represents only 14% of all applications, indicating a significant barrier for those seeking to return.

2. Challenges in the Reinstatement Process

• The reinstatement process has been described as cumbersome and bureaucratic, leading many potential applicants to become discouraged.

• Reports from those applying highlight obstacles at military processing centers, creating a barrier for reinstatement efforts.

3. Involvement of Military Officials

• Undersecretary of War Anthony Tata emphasized that the department is working diligently to ensure that service members are treated with dignity and that their reinstatement process is expedited.

• A task force has been created to investigate the implementation of Covid policies and ensure fair treatment of those affected.

4. Extended Support and Benefits

• Reinstated soldiers may qualify for back pay and other reparations for the disruption caused by their dismissal, which can amount to between $100,000 and $150,000.

• This support aims to offset the lost benefits and promote the return of these service members to their posts.

5. Military Personnel Crisis

• Over the span of three years, the U. S. military has experienced a significant decline in personnel, with around 95,000 service members leaving, many attributing their departure to the Covid vaccine mandates.

• The military has struggled with low recruitment numbers, prompting the easing of certain standards to maintain force levels.

6. Past Policy Overview

• The vaccination mandate was introduced by the Biden administration in August 2021, which led to a dramatic shift in the military's composition and challenges in recruitment.

• The mandate was ultimately rescinded by a defense spending bill in December 2022, but the effects lingered in terms of personnel loss and morale.

7. Efforts to Expedite Reinstatement

• The Navy has reportedly made strides in reinstatement processes, reducing wait times significantly.

• High-profile reinstatements, such as that of Army Capt. Mark Bashaw, illustrate the ongoing efforts to address past grievances and restore service members to full duty.

8. Response to Concerns

• Officials acknowledge the community's concerns and are committed to making substantial changes to the reinstatement process, with an emphasis on accountability and responsiveness to the impacted service members.

• Continuous discussions and meetings with former service members aim to ensure their voices are heard and incorporated into policy changes.

The reinstatement of military personnel dismissed under Covid-19 vaccine mandates is a complex and evolving situation. Despite current challenges, leaders like Undersecretary Anthony Tata are dedicated to navigating bureaucratic hurdles to welcome back service members and restore their rights. As efforts to streamline the process continue, many hope for a more efficient turnaround that reflects a commitment to the dignity and service of all military personnel involved.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/11/25/exclusive-war-dept-battles-internal-resistance-to-reinstate-86-soldiers-ejected-by-covid-shot-mandate/

Judge’s disqualification of Lindsey Halligan might impact Abbey Gate prosecution too

The implications of a judge's decision to disqualify Lindsey Halligan, an interim U. S. Attorney, from her role in prosecuting cases, particularly as it pertains to the Abbey Gate bombing case and the charges against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

1. Disqualification of Lindsey Halligan:

• A judge ruled that Halligan was unlawfully appointed, impacting her ability to prosecute cases, including the Abbey Gate bombing trial involving Mohammed Sharifullah.

• This disqualification allows for potential complications in ongoing prosecutions, as her role has been challenged in court.

2. Context of the Abbey Gate Case:

• Sharifullah, an alleged member of ISIS-K, is accused of providing reconnaissance for a bombing that killed 13 U. S. service members in August 2021.

• His trial was delayed from December 2025 to February 2026 due to these legal complications surrounding Halligan's appointment.

3. Defense Motions:

• Sharifullah’s attorneys filed a motion to disqualify Halligan, claiming her appointment violated legal statutes, rendering her actions void.

• The judge has ordered the DOJ to respond to this motion by January 20, 2026.

4. Legal Justification and Appointment Controversy:

• The disqualification stems from legal provisions regarding how U. S. Attorney vacancies are filled, highlighting concerns over Halligan's appointment process.

• Attorney General Pam Bondi insists that Halligan's disqualification will not affect other federal prosecutions her office handles.

5. Reactions and Future Implications:

• Various parties, including the DOJ and Bondi, expressed intentions to appeal the ruling regarding Halligan’s disqualification. There are hopes that charges against Comey and James can be refiled despite the dismissal of the current indictments.

• The article also notes the significant public safety implications, considering Sharifullah's alleged terrorist activities and previous admissions of involvement in various attacks.

The ongoing legal battles surrounding Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim U. S. Attorney have far-reaching consequences for several important prosecutions. The disqualification impacts the Abbey Gate bombing trial and could influence cases against high-profile figures like Comey and James, adding a complex layer to the justice process. The DOJ's forthcoming response to the motion to disqualify Halligan will be a key factor in determining the course of these legal proceedings in the near future. 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judges-disqualification-lindsey-halligan-might-impact-abbey-gate-prosecution

California’s War on Oil Actually Harms the Environment

The conflict in California's energy policy, particularly its ban on offshore oil drilling despite the state having significant oil reserves. It argues that the ban may worsen environmental issues and energy dependency.

1. Oil Reserves Off California:

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management reported that up to 10 billion barrels of recoverable crude oil are located just off the West Coast, mainly near Southern California. Despite this, state officials aim to shut down existing oil operations.

2. Santa Barbara's Ban:

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors recently banned new drilling and phases out existing operations, complicating efforts for companies like Sable Offshore Corp. to extract offshore oil.

3. Alternative Transport Method:

Sable Offshore Corp. is considering transferring oil directly to ocean-going tankers from offshore rigs, bypassing state regulations. Their success may impact federal decisions on new drilling leases off California.

4. Contrast with Wind Energy:

California is promoting the development of large offshore wind farms, expected to produce substantial energy. However, the article questions whether this effort presents more environmental problems than a few oil rigs and whether it can match the energy output from oil.

5. Oil vs. Wind Energy Production:

The potential output from the suggested offshore wind farms (20 gigawatts) could yield only five exajoules over 20 years. In comparison, 10 billion barrels of oil could provide 61 exajoules, highlighting the greater energy potential of oil.

6. Reliance on Imported Oil:

California imports over 75% of its oil while relying heavily on oil and natural gas for its energy needs. The article emphasizes the irony as the state has significant in-state oil reserves but continues to depend on foreign sources with poorer environmental practices.

7. Environmental Considerations:

The article argues that oil extraction in California could be environmentally beneficial. It states that methane leakage is primarily a natural occurrence due to seismic activity rather than a result of oil drilling.

8. Policy Implications:

To effectively reduce natural oil and methane seepage in the state, extracting oil from the reserves might be necessary. However, the article suggests that California's policymakers are unlikely to accept this approach.

California's energy policies appear contradictory, as the state aims to phase out oil drilling while simultaneously pushing for large offshore wind projects. This stance may not only harm California's environmental goals but also exacerbate the state's reliance on imported petroleum. The article calls for a reevaluation of these policies, proposing that responsible oil extraction could benefit both the state's economy and the environment. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/11/26/californias-war-on-oil-harms-the-environment/

Anti-Semitism Is Often ‘Fabricated,' According to Curriculum Bankrolled by George Soros

Liberal billionaire George Soros has funded a company named PARCEO to create a controversial anti-Semitism curriculum used in schools. The curriculum claims many accusations of anti-Semitism are fabricated to silence pro-Palestinian views. This initiative has sparked significant debate in educational institutions.

1. Funding Details: The Open Society Foundations (OSF) donated $50,000 to PARCEO for a curriculum titled "Curriculum on Antisemitism from a Framework of Collective Liberation. " This financial support has raised concerns regarding its content and implications.

2. Curriculum Content: The curriculum, developed by anti-Israel activists, has been criticized for presenting a biased view of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Critics state that it promotes a one-sided narrative, marginalizing Jewish perspectives and experiences related to anti-Semitism.

3. School Controversies: The implementation of the PARCEO curriculum has led to complaints from Jewish faculty, particularly at New York's High School for Community Leadership, where they described it as indoctrination. In San Francisco, the teachers' union provided the PARCEO curriculum as an alternative to an approved curriculum from the American Jewish Committee (AJC).

4. Statements from Critics: The AJC condemned the PARCEO material as bizarre and radical. Key advisors of the curriculum have controversial backgrounds, with some being linked to groups that support violence against Israel and make radical claims about anti-Semitism.

5. Soros's Stance on Anti-Semitism: This funding occurs amidst a rise in anti-Semitic incidents. Notably, 60% of hate crimes reported to the FBI are against Jewish individuals. Soros himself has faced numerous anti-Semitic attacks, which adds complexity to the narrative surrounding his funding choices.

6. Curriculum Purpose: According to its creators, the curriculum aims to educate students about anti-Semitism while framing it as a tool used by pro-Israel activists to suppress the Palestinian cause. They assert the need to differentiate between genuine anti-Semitism and its alleged misuse for political purposes.

7. Key Figures Involved: The curriculum was founded by anti-Israel activists with connections to various controversial organizations, including Samidoun, which has been labeled a front for a designated terrorist group.

8. Statements from Advisors: Some advisors to the curriculum have expressed support for violence in the struggle against Israel. They link the fight against anti-Semitism with broader social justice movements, stating these issues are interconnected.

The PARCEO anti-Semitism curriculum, funded by George Soros, has led to significant controversy in schools. Critics argue it promotes a biased view of anti-Semitism tied to anti-Israel sentiment, raising concerns about the implications for Jewish communities and broader discussions on hate and discrimination. Understanding the complexity of its content and the motivations behind its funding is essential in addressing the rising tide of anti-Semitism and its portrayal in education. 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/anti-semitism-is-often-fabricated-according-to-curriculum-bankrolled-by-george-soros/

How Much Asbestos Do Wind Turbines Contain?

Concerns about asbestos in wind turbines have intensified following the discovery of contaminated brake pads. Operators are now auditing their equipment amidst calls for broader investigations into the renewable energy supply chain.

• Goldwind found asbestos in lift brake pads at its Cattle Hill wind farm in Tasmania, prompting regulatory investigations from the Clean Energy Regulator and safety agencies.

• Other wind farm operators, including Vestas, are checking their brake parts for asbestos contamination.

• Asbestos was discovered in parts supplied by the Chinese company 3S Industries, which also serves industries beyond wind turbines, raising concerns about broader contamination in various settings.

• The potential presence of asbestos in friction clutches of turbines adds to the overall risk.

• Asbestos exposure is linked to serious health risks, including mesothelioma, a severe cancer affecting the lungs and stomach.

The situation is evolving, with significant implications for worker safety and public health, warranting thorough investigations across the supply chain. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/11/25/how-much-asbestos-do-wind-turbines-contain/

Republicans Aren’t Actually Interesting In Shrinking Government

The decline of enthusiasm for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative aimed at reducing government bureaucracy. It argues that Republican politicians have not fulfilled their promises to cut government spending due to their acceptance of progressive narratives about the necessity of government programs.

1. Decline of DOGE: DOGE, initially promising to reduce federal bureaucracy, has been deemed unsuccessful, with key personnel leaving and its central authority diminishing.

2. Republican Promises: Historically, Republican politicians have often failed to deliver on promises to cut government spending. Although the Trump administration sparked some excitement for budget cuts, this momentum has waned.

3. Public Support for Cuts: Many Americans, frustrated by pandemic lockdowns and economic mismanagement, initially supported the idea of cutting federal spending, especially after the chaos that ensued during the pandemic.

4. Republican Derailment: The blame for the failure to effectively cut government rests on Republican leaders who adopt a progressive viewpoint that frames government programs as essential while disregarding evidence that such programs often serve political and economic elites at the expense of taxpayers.

5. Progressive Narrative: The article critiques the progressive vision of government as a benevolent provider of services, arguing that this perspective ignores the complex motivations behind government programs, which often prioritize the interests of those in power.

6. Misunderstanding of Government Role: Republicans tend to accept progressive beliefs about government, failing to see that many governmental programs hinder economic progress rather than help.

7. Need for Action: The author emphasizes that significant cuts are necessary to resolve deep economic issues, but this requires more than just small administrative changes; it requires a grassroots movement that challenges the status quo.

8. Excitement for Change: To generate real momentum for spending cuts, political leaders must acknowledge the true nature of government programs and effectively communicate their adverse impacts on everyday citizens.

The article reflects a deep dissatisfaction with both the current state of government spending and the lack of true commitment from Republican leaders to implement significant cuts. It highlights the need for a broader political movement to challenge and dissect the progressive narratives surrounding government programs, advocating for profound changes rather than superficial adjustments. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/republicans-arent-actually-interesting-shrinking-government

Undermining America’s National Security Is Nothing New For Mark Kelly

Senator Mark Kelly, a Democratic senator from Arizona and a retired Navy captain, has recently come under scrutiny for actions that some claim undermine national security. This summary outlines the recent allegations against him, particularly surrounding a controversial video involving military orders.

1. Controversial Video:

• On November 25, 2025, it was announced that Sen. Kelly could be recalled to active duty due to his participation in a video referred to as the "Seditious Six."

• In this video, Kelly and other lawmakers urged military members to disobey potential illegal orders from President Donald Trump without specifying which orders were deemed illegal.

• War Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged that while five of the participants are not under Department of War jurisdiction, Kelly, as a retired Navy Officer, is.

2. Political Impact:

• The video was described as a politically motivated effort that could have serious implications within the military, as questioning lawful orders from the Commander-in-Chief could undermine military discipline.

3. Previous Actions:

• In past actions, Kelly has been accused of interfering in matters related to military leadership. For instance, during a Senate hearing, he defended former Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley concerning allegations that Milley reassured China about U. S. military actions, arguing that it was a responsible act to prevent conflict.

4. Ties to China:

• Kelly's past connections with Chinese companies have raised further concerns about his commitment to national security. Prior to his Senate career, he co-founded World View, a space tourism company that had received investments from Tencent, a Chinese tech giant.

• Although he has distanced himself from the company since 2019, these ties have been viewed as problematic, especially given his prior role as an advisor to a company that partnered with a Chinese state-financed entity.

5. Concerns Over Commitment:

• Critics argue that Kelly's actions—such as defending allegedly improper behavior by military leaders and his financial ties to Chinese enterprises—reflect a troubling pattern that may compromise U. S. national security interests.

Sen. Mark Kelly faces significant scrutiny for his recent involvement in a controversial video that calls on military personnel to ignore orders, alongside historical actions that suggest a pattern of undermining national security. His ties to Chinese interests only exacerbate these concerns, leaving many to question his commitment to safeguarding the United States amidst growing geopolitical tensions. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/11/25/undermining-americas-national-security-is-nothing-new-for-mark-kelly/

Grassley: FBI Records Show Partisan Officials Killed Clinton Campaign Investigation

U. S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has released internal communications showing that Department of Justice (DOJ) officials chose not to pursue a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) regarding alleged campaign finance violations.

• Grassley disclosed emails and a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) communication revealing that DOJ officials ignored evidence provided by FBI agents about Clinton's and the DNC's misconduct.

• The misconduct included hidden payments made to Fusion GPS for creating the Steele Dossier, which falsely suggested collusion between Trump and Russia.

• The decision not to investigate was made by Richard Pilger from DOJ's Public Integrity Section and J. P. Cooney from the U. S. Attorney’s Office for D. C.

• Grassley claims that whistleblowers alerted him to the interference by the DOJ and noted the contrasting approach taken by officials in the Arctic Frost investigation aimed at Trump.

• Grassley expressed gratitude to Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Patel for providing the requested information.

Grassley plans to continue his investigation into these matters, highlighting concerns over partisan behavior in the DOJ's handling of campaign-related issues. 

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/grassley-fbi-records-show-partisan-officials-killed-clinton-campaign-investigation

Chicago’s Marxist Mayor Brandon Johnson Says Imprisoning Violent Criminals is ‘Racist, Immoral and Unholy’

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson recently made controversial statements at a news conference, expressing his views on crime and imprisonment, particularly regarding violent offenders. He argues against traditional incarceration methods, labeling them as racist and immoral.

1. Statements on Incarceration:

• Mayor Johnson stated it is wrong to believe that incarcerating violent criminals is a valid solution. He claimed, “We cannot incarcerate our way out of violence,” emphasizing the failure of this approach, which has led to the United States having the largest prison population globally without effectively reducing crime.

2. Views on Prisons:

• Johnson believes that reliance on jails is outdated, describing such practices as "racist, immoral, and unholy. " He advocates for exploring and implementing alternative methods to address crime rather than imprisonment.

3. Context of Chicago's Crime Issues:

• Chicago has a significant problem with violent crime, particularly shootings, with high rates of homicides concentrated in certain neighborhoods. Most victims and perpetrators are young males.

4. Additional Campaigns:

• Mayor Johnson has actively opposed immigration enforcement practices initiated during the Trump administration. He criticized the term "illegal alien," equating its usage to derogatory historical labels related to slavery. He insists on the use of more respectful language, preferring "undocumented individuals. "

5. Political Pushback:

• In response to Johnson’s views, former President Trump has suggested that both Johnson and Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker should face consequences for not sufficiently supporting federal law enforcement.

Mayor Brandon Johnson’s comments reflect a broader debate on crime management and social justice in Chicago and the United States. By questioning conventional incarceration strategies, he proposes a shift towards more rehabilitative and supportive approaches. These statements have sparked significant discussion about how best to address crime and maintain public safety while considering societal and ethical implications. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/chicagos-marxist-mayor-brandon-johnson-says-imprisoning-violenct/

Trump’s directive to “focus all of our energy and might on ELECTION FRAUD” isn’t random rhetoric.

 

STOLEN ELECTIONS with Gary Berntsen & Ralph Pezzullo | Ep 45 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA9OCusr64A

By Staff Writers

It coincides with:

Reports of state-level misconduct particularly the Arizona bribery allegations.

A growing frustration within independent and conservative circles that the DOJ remains inert while weaponizing its power selectively.

Renewed exposure from Lara Logan’s interviews with intelligence insiders like Gary Berntsen, former CIA, who claim the infiltration of domestic election systems by both U.S. and foreign intelligence-linked contractors.

This re‑energized focus appears strategically timed: ensuring election system reform before the 2026 Midterms, when control of Congress and by extension, impeachment or legislative protection may hinge on prosecutorial follow‑through.

Alleged Arizona Bribery Scandal

The allegation about Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes receiving $200,000 through the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA) is explosive because it implies a quid pro quo exchange: funding in return for outsourcing prosecutorial discretion to a non‑governmental entity with a partisan bias in election administration.

The core assertion: that a left‑leaning NGO was granted investigatory reach over election‑related cases, effectively privatizing justice.

A whistleblower memo by Christina Bobb purportedly documents internal resistance to federal investigation the DOJ and FBI allegedly showing deliberate inaction.

Inference: If true, it means the chain of accountability was intentionally broken state prosecutors offloading cases to an unelected foundation, shielding political actors from oversight.

You should seek the actual memo text (if available through independent outlets such as Gateway Pundit, Just The News, or Children’s Health Defense Investigations). These sources often publish primary documents the mainstream omits.

Lara Logan’s Interview: Ex‑CIA Bulwark Gary Berntsen

Berntsen, a respected former CIA field commander who ran operations against al‑Qaeda, has been publicly warning about domestic subversion mechanisms for years. In Logan’s latest program shared by Trump, Berntsen and co‑author Ralph Pezzullo outline how:

Certain foreign‑owned voting infrastructure companies, notably Smartmatic, maintain data access pathways that allow remote server communication.

Elements within U.S. intelligence and defense contracting ecosystems have over‑collected election metadata, under the pretext of “monitoring disinformation,” while silently aggregating U.S. voter behavior profiles.

Some of these capacities originate from Venezuelan‑linked software architectures used by Smartmatic in the early 2000s.

These are not fringe voices Berntsen’s career credentials are verifiable, and Pezzullo’s writing is sourced to intelligence insiders. The mainstream press tends to label such warnings “debunked” without addressing the technical core: foreign-developed code at any layer of ballot counting introduces a theoretical and practical vulnerability, whether or not it was exploited.

Smartmatic Connections: Venezuela & Beyond

Tracing Smartmatic’s origin shows an uncomfortable geopolitical lineage:

Founded in Caracas, Venezuela, 2000s, with early state contracts under Hugo Chávez.

Operated in over 25 nations before embedding in the American system via licensing, merging, or contracting relationships frequently through subsidiaries or shell vendors.

Congressional reports, mid‑2000s, already warned about potential foreign influence over vote‑tabulation hardware and software integrity.

Smartmatic’s official line is that its systems in the U.S. “operate independently of foreign jurisdictions.” But technical audits repeatedly reveal open integration points. Windows‑based back‑end servers, unsecured APIs, and remote diagnostics.

Even if these were never used for manipulation, their mere existence violates election‑integrity principles: an air‑gapped vote tabulation system should have zero remote connectivity.

DOJ & Institutional Stonewalling

Abe Hamadeh’s formal DOJ request essentially demanding investigation into all major allegations, including Smartmatic and the Arizona NGO issue represents an attempt to document institutional indifference.

Historically, the DOJ has shown a clear pattern:

Overwhelming vigor against individual whistleblowers, Assange, Snowden, even state election auditors.

Total passivity toward systemic vulnerabilities that could implicate the ruling machinery.

That asymmetry is not incompetence; it’s protection of power structures.

Where This Leaves the Public

Given the stakes, here’s what serious citizens should be doing right now:

Request full disclosure of all state election‑system auditing reports, including vendor contracts. Under FOIA, these must be made public.

Demand forensic imaging of servers used in 2020–2024 elections, before they are data‑cycled.

Push legislators to require open‑source tabulation code, subject to neutral third‑party audits.

Support independent investigative journalism, Logan’s work, KanekoaTheGreat’s data threads, JTN’s FOIA series, their survival is vital for transparency.

Trump’s proclamation may carry political overtones, but underneath that lies an undeniable structural crisis:

the intertwining of political, corporate, and intelligence apparatus in the operation of election systems.

Until Americans insist on source‑code transparency, auditability, and removal of private intermediaries, confidence in elections will continue to erode and rightfully so.

We Need to Do Better Than Another Enlightenment

David Bell reflects on the Enlightenment, questioning its status as a high point of human achievement while acknowledging the complex and often harsh realities surrounding that era. He emphasizes the importance of understanding history in a broader context rather than romanticizing the past.

1. Cultural Background: Bell shares his Australian upbringing, which was less focused on intellectual pursuits and shaped by the realities of colonization and its impact on societal structures.

2. Understanding the Enlightenment: The Enlightenment is often seen as a golden age for intellectual progress. However, Bell argues that this period was also marked by slavery, oppression, and inequality, questioning whether such a period should be idealized.

3. Notable Achievements vs. Harsh Realities: While the Enlightenment produced beautiful art and notable thinkers like Handel and Rousseau, these achievements occurred in a context where many people lived in poverty, illiteracy, and oppression.

4. Romanticizing the Past: Bell critiques the tendency to romanticize earlier eras like the one that produced the Venetian Republic, which thrived on brutal practices like slavery. He considers this a shallow perspective, ignoring the suffering that had enabled such artistic flourishes.

5. Learning from History: While it's valuable to learn from the past, Bell emphasizes that history is often recorded by the elite and should not be misconceived as the ideal state of society.

6. Contemporary Freedom and Rights: Bell suggests that, despite current challenges, we enjoy more freedoms now than in previous eras. Recent losses of rights may push society closer to Enlightenment values rather than moving away from them.

7. Need for Noble Aspirations: He argues against yearning for a return to past conditions characterized by oppression and instead advocates for striving toward a more noble future, recognizing the tragic circumstances under which historical masterpieces were created.

Bell concludes that while the Enlightenment has its merits, it should not be romanticized. Instead, society should aim for continuous improvement and not be held back by a nostalgic view of the past, which was often marked by suffering and injustice. True artistic and intellectual pursuits should be appreciated in light of their complex origins, and humanity should aim for a future that goes beyond past failures. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/we-need-to-do-better-than-another-enlightenment/ 

Clinton Judge Dismisses Federal Indictments Against Comey and James

 Federal indictments against James Comey and Leticia James were dismissed by Judge Cameron Currie, highlighting concerns about judicial authority and executive power.

• Judge Currie dismissed the criminal cases against Leticia James and James Comey because he found that Lindsey Halligan, the acting U. S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, had no authority to present the indictments.

• Currie, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, stated that Halligan's appointment violated federal law and the Constitution, arguing that judges should primarily have the power to appoint interim U. S. Attorneys, not the Attorney General or the President.

• Both cases were dismissed “without prejudice,” allowing the possibility for the government to file new indictments later. However, Comey's case may face challenges due to the statute of limitations.

• The Department of Justice plans to appeal Judge Currie's decision.

• Following the dismissal, Comey claimed vindication and expressed gratitude to his defense team while failing to mention previous controversies surrounding his case.

Judge Currie's ruling has sparked discussions about judicial overreach and the balance of power between branches of government. As the DOJ prepares to appeal, the impasse continues around the potential future of these indictments and the broader investigations into issues stemming from the "Russiagate" controversy.

https://www.declassified.live/p/clinton-judge-dismisses-federal-indictments 

Kari Lake EXPOSES THE SWAMP: Shocking Fire Sale, Lies About Funding! “Criminal Behavior Will Be Referred to DOJ!”

 In a recent interview, Kari Lake, Chief of the U. S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), revealed severe corruption and mismanagement within the federal government's taxpayer-funded media organizations. This summary outlines the key points from her allegations, including financial misconduct, the spread of propaganda, and calls for accountability.

1. Corruption in Federal Media:

• Lake discussed significant corruption within the USAGM, highlighting missing funds and equipment that is being sold at drastically reduced prices.

• Specifically, high-end cameras worth $10,000 are being sold for as little as 80 cents, described by Lake as a "mass fire sale. "

2. Misleading Statements from Executives:

• Executives at Radio Free Asia claimed they had to sell equipment due to lack of funding, but Lake challenged this narrative, asserting that the agency has been consistently funded.

3. Criminal Investigations:

• Lake announced that auditors will investigate the financials of the USAGM to track where taxpayer money has gone.

• She warned that any discovered criminal behavior would be referred to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

4. Media as a Propaganda Tool:

• Under the Biden administration, Lake accused the USAGM and Voice of America of becoming platforms for left-wing propaganda. She claimed that staff had even consulted with the Chinese embassy on how best to report on China.

5. Budgetary Control:

• In an unusual stance for a federal agency head, Lake has urged Congress to reduce her agency's budget. She argues that large budgets lead to corruption, stating they are forced by law to spend what they are allocated, regardless of actual needs.

6. Criticism of Mainstream Media:

• Lake criticized major news outlets for their complicity in misinformation, suggesting they knowingly mislead the public about election integrity and other critical issues.

7. Election Integrity Support:

• She expressed support for ending the Senate filibuster to facilitate the passage of election integrity laws, indicating that circumstances have changed and decisive action is necessary to ensure fair elections.

8. Justice for January 6th Protesters:

• Lake criticized the treatment of participants in the January 6th protest, saying that there was no armed insurrection. She commended forgiving actions taken by Trump for pardoning those unfairly targeted for their political beliefs.

9. Advocacy for New Media:

• She praised President Trump for allowing new media outlets to ask questions previously monopolized by mainstream media, ensuring a wider range of voices is heard in political discussions.

10. Personal Conviction:

• Lake shared her deep commitment to the country and the American people, stating she would make sacrifices for the nation's future. She emphasized her focus on election reform and the importance of accountability among officials.

Kari Lake's revelations point to significant issues within the U. S. Agency for Global Media, including corruption, media manipulation, and the need for reform in how taxpayer funds are utilized. Her dedication to transparency and accountability, alongside her commitment to improving election integrity, reflects a determined stance against what she sees as a broken system. Lake's call for an investigation and budget cuts underlines her efforts to tackle these deep-rooted problems directly. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/kari-lake-exposes-swamp-shocking-fire-sale-lies/

Why Did Democrats Suddenly Go Quiet On Epstein Files?

 The recent shift in attention from Democrats regarding the Epstein files, which initially sparked significant media coverage.

• Democrats initially tried to use the Epstein files to create negative headlines against President Trump and the GOP.

• The media buzz around Epstein peaked when Trump signed a spending bill, but attention has recently dwindled.

• Democrats had called for the release of the Epstein files but have since quieted as troubling connections between Epstein and Democratic figures have surfaced.

• A specific incident highlighted is Epstein's communication with a House Democrat during a 2019 hearing aimed at Trump.

• Investigations are being demanded regarding suspicious financial transactions related to Epstein.

• The narrative backfired on Democrats, as they faced revelations that contradicted their attacks.

The shift in the Democratic narrative on the Epstein files suggests potential regret over their previous focus and strategy concerning the issue. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-did-democrats-suddenly-go-quiet-epstein-files

Democrats Calling for Mutiny Must Be Punished

 A recent incident where six Democrats in Congress have created videos encouraging members of the military and intelligence community to disobey President Trump's orders. This act has sparked significant backlash, with accusations of sedition and calls for punishment against the lawmakers.

1. Inciting Mutiny:

The six Democrats, dubbed the "Seditious Six," have openly invited military personnel to resist President Trump, claiming their intentions are to protect the Constitution. However, critics argue that this encourages insubordination and jeopardizes national security.

2. Public Response:

The general public, particularly those unsympathetic to leftist ideologies, have condemned these actions, labeling the lawmakers as "TikTok Traitors" and demanding accountability for their words.

3. Historical Context of Political Language:

The article reflects on past political behavior, particularly referencing Bill Clinton’s famous statement about the meaning of "is," which is seen as a precursor to the ongoing obfuscation in politics today. The article cites former CIA director John Brennan’s misleading statements on the Hunter Biden laptop as an example of this trend.

4. Failure to Justify Claims:

One of the lawmakers, Senator Elissa Slotkin, was unable to specify any unlawful orders from President Trump when pressed. This raises questions about the legitimacy of their public calls for mutiny.

5. Consequences of Insubordination:

The article warns that encouraging troops to disobey orders can have dire consequences in real-life situations, potentially leading to disastrous outcomes during military engagements. This strategy could undermine trust and effectiveness in the military.

6. Impact on Global Relations:

The actions of these Democrats could weaken America's global standing, leading adversaries to perceive instability within the U. S. government. This could embolden nations like China to take aggressive actions, such as invading Taiwan.

7. Double Standards in Accountability:

The article argues that Democrats often escape consequences for actions that would bring severe penalties if committed by Republicans. Past incidents involving high-profile Democrats are cited to illustrate this perceived inequity in accountability.

8. Political Privilege:

The author claims that Democrats are able to act with impunity, knowing that left-leaning officials will not prosecute them. This trend is believed to contribute to the deterioration of trust in government and could eventually threaten the Union.

The article ends with a call for the accountability of those who promote sedition, expressing skepticism that real consequences will arise from the actions of the Democrats involved. The author emphasizes the urgent need for a fair justice system that holds all parties accountable, regardless of political affiliation, for the health of the nation’s democracy. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/11/democrats_calling_for_mutiny_must_be_punished.html

Comey, James Escape Justice For Now Thanks To Judicial Coup Against Presidential Power

 A recent judicial decision has led to the dismissal of federal indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. This ruling, made by Judge Cameron Currie, has raised questions about judicial authority and potential bias within the legal system.

1. Dismissal of Indictments: The federal indictments against James Comey and Letitia James were dismissed by Judge Currie, who stated that the indictments were invalid due to procedural reasons, specifically the improper appointment of interim U. S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan.

2. Grounds for Dismissal: Judge Currie argued that Halligan lacked the necessary qualifications to present the case because she had been appointed by Attorney General Pam Bondi just days before the indictment without proper authority.

3. Status of the Cases: The Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to appeal the ruling to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. They are also appealing related dismissals in other circuits.

4. Reactions from Legal Analysts: Legal experts like Will Chamberlain and Mike Davis expressed doubt over Currie's ruling, suggesting it may be reversed on appeal. They criticized the judge for what they perceive as a political bias in favor of Comey and James.

5. Concerns Over Judicial Overreach: The decision has been described as part of a broader pattern of judicial overreach and has spurred discussions on the separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.

6. Historical Context: In 1986, Congress enacted laws regarding the appointment of interim U. S. Attorneys, which some experts argue limits the executive branch's authority. The constitutionality of this shared authority structure is now being questioned as a cause of the current judicial confusion.

7. Claims of Political Bias: Various commentators have highlighted that the dismissals represent a "two systems of justice" scenario, where political affiliations might influence legal proceedings and outcomes.

The ruling in the cases against Comey and James represents significant legal implications, particularly regarding the validity of judicial decisions based on procedural technicalities and the political affiliations of those involved. As the DOJ prepares to appeal this decision, the case may become a focal point for discussions on judicial power, executive authority, and political accountability in the United States.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/11/25/comey-james-escape-justice-for-now-thanks-to-judicial-coup-against-presidential-power/