Comey Indictment Set to Expose Criminal Leaking Enterprise

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on charges of making false statements to Congress and obstruction of Congress. This indictment, delivered by a Virginia grand jury, may unveil more than just issues surrounding Comey himself—it could expose a broader network of alleged criminal leaking within the FBI.

1. Indictment Details:

• James Comey was indicted on September 25, 2025, on two counts: false statement to Congress and obstruction of Congress.

• Prosecutors claim Comey lied during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, stating he did not authorize anyone at the FBI to act as an anonymous source regarding an investigation related to Hillary Clinton.

2. Identification of Anonymous Sources:

• Initially, it was assumed that "Person 3" mentioned in the indictment was Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI. However, it is now believed that the person may be Daniel Richman, a close friend of Comey and a professor who served as a media liaison.

• Richman allegedly slipped information to journalists, including details about Comey's conversations with President Trump, influencing media narrative.

3. Comey and Media Manipulation:

• Comey directed Richman to leak information about his discussions with Trump regarding investigations, purportedly to expedite the appointment of a special counsel for the Russia investigation.

• Richman had served as a "special government employee" with access to classified information, allowing him to interact with the media on sensitive topics without FBI consultation.

4. Evidence of Misconduct:

• Documents from an FBI investigation named "Arctic Haze" revealed that Comey and Richman had interactions aimed at shaping media coverage favorably for Comey while damaging to Trump.

• This included disclosing classified information related to Attorney General Loretta Lynch to the New York Times via Richman and other sources, leading to public confusion over the legitimacy of investigations into Clinton's emails.

5. Potential Further Charges:

• Questions arise about whether Comey’s actions, potentially including directing others to leak classified information, could lead to additional charges against him or other involved FBI agents like Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

6. Previous Investigations:

• An earlier investigation, Arctic Haze, was closed without charges due to insufficient evidence against Comey or Richman. Observers speculate that political influences may have played a role in that decision.

The indictment against James Comey is expected to reveal a larger scheme of criminal leaking within the FBI. Allegations suggest he misled Congress intentionally, with implications that may extend to others in the agency, indicating a potential conspiracy that could involve multiple high-profile figures involved in the investigation of Hillary Clinton. The situation remains fluid, and the full extent of any wrongdoing may yet emerge as further investigations unfold. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/comey-indictment-set-to-expose-criminal

How the U.S. Gave Away Its Technology Edge to China

 American corporations have historically shared technology with Chinese partners to gain access to a large consumer market and cheaper labor. While this strategy initially boosted profits, a recent study suggests it ultimately harmed the U. S. economy. This summary outlines the key points from the study, focusing on its findings and implications.

1. Joint Ventures and Technology Sharing:

• American companies, including General Motors and Intel, established joint ventures with Chinese firms to share advanced manufacturing techniques and management practices.

• This collaboration was seen as a beneficial trade-off for better market access and lower production costs.

2. Negative Consequences for the U. S.:

• A study by economists points out that these joint ventures helped Chinese companies become stronger competitors, which harmed American firms, particularly smaller ones.

• U. S. companies in industries where joint ventures flourished saw declines in sales, employment, and innovation.

3. Economic Analysis:

• The analysis framed the decision to engage China as a collective mistake at a national level rather than just a company-by-company choice.

• Had the U. S. banned joint ventures starting in 1999, the authors calculate that American welfare could be 1.2% higher today.

4. Wider Economic Impact:

• Larger companies that benefited from joint ventures would have suffered a 22% drop in profits, while smaller companies and American workers could have benefitted from higher wages and job security.

• Real wages for American workers might have been nearly 3% higher.

5. Political and Economic Context:

• Despite the negative impacts, the U. S. government did not intervene, primarily due to a prevailing belief in the benefits of unfettered capital flows and the lack of visible evidence regarding a gradual decline in competitiveness.

• The complexity of the issue made it hard to discern the benefits of joint ventures versus the harm done to domestic competition.

6. Changing Perspectives on Investment Restrictions:

• There has been a recent bipartisan shift in Washington towards limiting investments in Chinese technology, evidenced by the 2022 CHIPS Act.

• While previous policies seemed purely optimistic, current perspectives view some restrictions as necessary.

7. Timing and Industry Focus:

• The paper warns that the opportunity to implement effective investment restrictions has decreased, and such measures might now produce limited benefits.

• Policymakers must consider when and in which industries to restrict investment to maximize benefits.

The research into American companies' investments in China highlights the pitfalls of technology transfer through joint ventures, which have contributed to an imbalance in competitiveness. A more strategic approach to investment restrictions in high-tech industries could be necessary, but timing and industry focus are crucial to avoid exacerbating the existing problems. The economic landscape requires careful evaluation to ensure that policies serve the broader interests of the American workforce and industry.

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2025/09/29/breitbart-business-digest-how-the-u-s-gave-away-its-technology-edge-to-china/

Oregon Governor Says There's No Insurrection, Tells Trump To "Stand Down"

 Recent tensions in Portland relate to ongoing protests by activist groups like Antifa and their interactions with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The situation has drawn criticism from both political leaders and journalists, revealing differing perspectives on the state of law and order in the city.

1. Protests and Violence: Antifa's actions in Portland have escalated over the years, supported by local Democratic leaders during events like the BLM riots. Reports show these groups actively engaging in riots and targeting law enforcement, especially during nighttime protests.

2. Political Denial: Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and other Democrats downplay the violence, claiming the city has returned to a state of peace and that President Donald Trump’s view of Portland is misguided. They argue that recent protest videos do not reflect the current situation, while some journalists and citizens assert otherwise.

3. Tensions with ICE: Antifa groups have threatened ICE officers while trying to disrupt deportation activities. There is concern over safety and law enforcement’s diminished response to threats against federal facilities.

4. Federal Response: Trump’s announcement to send federal troops to protect ICE facilities has intensified the political conversation. Local leaders resist the idea, insisting that the cities are safe and that federal intervention is unnecessary.

5. Escalating Violence: Recent incidents have included a firebombing of Ice Cube’s tour bus, raising alarms about the actions of far-left groups. Reports indicate that Antifa organizations may be preparing to erase their online presence amid the media scrutiny.

Portland is grappling with ongoing protests, with divergent views on the manifestations of violence and activism in the area. Political leaders, particularly Democrats, assert peace prevails, while others highlight the need for action against rising threats. The situation continues to develop, reflecting broader national tensions surrounding law enforcement and civil unrest.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/oregon-governor-says-theres-no-insurrection-tells-trump-stand-down

Britain Is Turning Its Back On Western Civilization

 National Health Service (NHS) in Britain has published guidance encouraging cousin marriage, which has sparked significant criticism. This controversial endorsement is seen as a departure from Britain's historical values and its response to cultural changes due to immigration.

1. NHS Guidance on Cousin Marriage:

• The NHS recommended cousin marriage, emphasizing perceived benefits such as robust family support and economic advantages.

• Despite acknowledging that such marriages increase the risk of genetic disorders, the NHS's focus is on accommodating cultural practices among Muslim immigrants.

2. Historical Context:

• The practice of cousin marriage has been largely rejected in Western culture, stemming from early Christian teachings that discouraged it. This shift was particularly important in Europe during the rise of Christianity, as it helped promote social cohesion and integration among tribes.

• Significant figures, such as Pope Gregory the Great, helped to establish norms against cousin marriage to enhance societal stability.

3. Cultural Shift in Modern Britain:

• Critics argue that the British government is failing to uphold its cultural history and values by endorsing cousin marriage to avoid accusations of racism.

• The current political leadership is critiqued for favoring foreign customs over British traditions, and the NHS's position is seen as indicative of a broader cultural failure.

4. Comparison to Historical Figures:

• The article compares the current British leadership's actions to those of King Henry VIII, who altered cultural practices for personal gains, thereby undermining existing traditions.

• The reluctance to challenge the practices of immigrant communities is framed as a failure of modern British authorities to assert their cultural identity and history.

5. Concerns for the Future:

• The NHS's guidance is viewed not merely as a medical recommendation but as part of a troubling trend of abandoning core values associated with Western civilization.

• The article raises concerns that Britain's rulers are changing societal norms and undermining the foundations of Western culture by accommodating practices considered regressive.

The endorsement of cousin marriage by the NHS has drawn criticism for its implications on British societal values and history. Critics contend that this reflects a significant shift away from Western traditions, leading to the normalization of practices that were once prohibited as detrimental to social cohesion. The situation represents a broader tension in Britain as it navigates cultural changes amid increasing immigration, challenging its historical identity and values.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/30/britain-is-turning-its-back-on-western-civilization/

Historic peace deal: What it means if Hamas and Israel agree

On September 29, 2025, President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unveiled a new peace plan aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict with Hamas in Gaza. The plan requires Hamas to agree to the terms set forth but includes provisions for moving forward even if Hamas does not comply.

1. Announcement of the Peace Plan:

• The peace plan was introduced at a press conference where Netanyahu emphasized its necessity, stating, "This can be done the easy way or the hard way, but it must be done. " This highlights the urgency and importance of the agreement.

2. Political Support:

• The initiative received positive feedback from Republican lawmakers and the Palestinian Authority, which expressed support for the efforts aimed at achieving peace.

3. Terms of the Peace Agreement:

• The proposed 20-point agreement seeks to transform Gaza into a peaceful zone, ending hostilities. It includes:

• Immediate military cessation by Israel upon agreement.

• Hamas to release hostages and, in return, Israel will free prisoners.

• Amnesty for Hamas members who disarm and peace terms.

4. Governance of Gaza:

• Governance will shift to a technocratic committee with international support, and a "Board of Peace" led by Trump and other global leaders will oversee Gaza's reconstruction.

• An international economic development plan aims to establish a special economic zone in Gaza, encouraging investment and improving living conditions.

5. International Stabilization Force (ISF):

• An ISF consisting of international partners will help maintain peace, train Palestinian police, and secure borders, allowing for trade and humanitarian aid without interference.

6. Future of Palestinian Statehood:

• The plan suggests a pathway for Palestinian self-determination and statehood, contingent upon reforms in the Palestinian Authority and a focus on peaceful coexistence.

7. Reactions and Recent Developments:

• Prior to the announcement, diplomatic efforts included a call between Trump, Netanyahu, and the Qatari Prime Minister regarding a recent controversial missile strike by Israel that resulted in casualties in Qatar. Netanyahu expressed regret for the incident.

The new peace initiative seeks to fundamentally change the relationship between Israel and Hamas, aiming for a stable and peaceful future in Gaza. While the success of the plan relies on Hamas's acceptance and the commitment of various stakeholders, it represents a significant effort towards resolving long-standing tensions in the region. The ambitions of both leaders reflect a hopeful outlook for lasting peace as articulated by Trump in his social media messages. 

https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/historic-hamas-peace-deal-what-it-means-region-and-us

Why Trump Wants to Ban the Muslim Brotherhood – And Why America Should Care

President Trump's attempts to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization and explores the implications of this for America. It highlights the different meanings of charity and outreach within the context of the Brotherhood and raises concerns about the influence of radical Islam in the U. S.

1. Different Meanings of Charity: The concept of charity (zakat) in radical Islamist teachings is aimed at advancing Islam, rather than purely helping the needy. This contrasts with common American perceptions of charity focused on providing aid to the poor.

2. Radical Islam in America: The article points out that radical Islam has gained traction within the U. S., manifesting in local politics and public protests. Examples include disputes in Dearborn, Michigan, and protests in Washington, D. C., highlighting growing political power among radical sympathizers.

3. Muslim Brotherhood’s History: Founded in Egypt in 1928, the Brotherhood is linked to various extremist groups like Hamas and al-Qaeda. It has been outlawed in several countries but operates in the U. S. under the guise of charities, exemplified by the case of the Holy Land Foundation, which was convicted of funding terrorism.

4. Continued Influence of the Brotherhood: Despite past convictions, organizations associated with the Brotherhood maintain legitimacy in America, often presenting themselves as civil rights advocates. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is noted for its controversial history but enjoys partnerships and political recognition today.

5. Financial and Ideological Tactics: The Brotherhood employs complex financial networks to fund militant activities while advancing its ideology through institutions like mosques and campus organizations. These groups often encourage anti-Israel sentiments and support for Hamas, especially after events such as the October 7, 2023, attacks.

6. Call for Action: The authors support Trump's push to formally label the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, which would allow for financial investigations and accountability. They argue that failing to act allows the Brotherhood to further infiltrate American society under the guise of charity and social justice.

The article emphasizes the urgent need for America to recognize the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. It warns that ignoring the threat posed by this group, which disguises itself as a charitable entity, could lead to further radicalization and danger within the U. S. The authors argue that charity and outreach used in the service of jihad do not represent true charity or dialogue. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/09/why_trump_wants_to_ban_the_muslim_brotherhood_and_why_america_should_care.html

The plot thickens: Clinton identified as “Person 1” in James Comey indictment

 Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on charges related to false statements and obstruction of justice concerning his testimony about the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. This indictment reveals complex relationships and actions that have impacted political and legal discussions in the United States.

1. Indictment Details:

• James Comey faces two charges: false statements and obstruction of justice.

• The indictment resulted from Comey’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2020, where he allegedly misled officials about authorizing leaks tied to the FBI's investigation of Clinton.

2. Identification of "Person 1":

• The documents from the indictment identify Hillary Clinton as "Person 1" and Daniel Richman, a professor and Comey's confidant, as "Person 3."

• Comey reportedly allowed Richman to leak classified information about the Clinton email investigation, which influenced the push for a special counsel.

3. False Statements Charge:

• Allegations suggest that Comey made misleading statements when he denied authorizing leaks concerning the investigation.

• He claimed he did not designate anyone at the FBI as an anonymous source, despite granting Richman permission to act as one.

4. Richman's Role:

• Richman is involved in the leaks but has not been charged with any crime. He helped relay classified details to the media, affecting public perception and potentially provoking further investigations.

5. Comey's Controversial Tenure:

• Comey has been a contentious figure for nearly a decade, especially regarding his handling of the Clinton email investigation and the Trump-Russia probe.

• His actions under scrutiny intensified during the Trump presidency, attracting criticism from numerous political figures.

6. Reactions from Law Enforcement:

• FBI Director Kash Patel criticized the politicization of the bureau during Comey's tenure, particularly related to the investigations concerning Russia.

7. Broader Implications:

• The indictment not only challenges Comey's legacy but also raises significant questions about the FBI's reputation and its interactions with the media and political entities.

• The ongoing legal proceedings may uncover more about the balance between law enforcement actions and public scrutiny.

James Comey's indictment serves as a critical episode in the ongoing discussions around national security, the FBI's integrity, and the intersection of law and politics in the United States. With Hillary Clinton named in the indictment and Comey’s actions scrutinized, the revelations may further complicate the already polarized political landscape. The forthcoming legal confrontation will likely unfold additional details and impact both Comey’s reputation and the perception of the FBI as an institution.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-09-30-clinton-identified-as-person-1-comey-indictment.html

Netanyahu Endorses Trump Plan to End Gaza War

 California woman violently arrested by sheriff’s deputies secures $17M

Trump suggests FBI agents’ involvement in Jan. 6 warrants Wray investigation

YouTube agrees to pay $24.5 million to settle Trump lawsuit: Court filing

Trump, top Democrats fail to make progress in averting looming shutdown

MAGA erupts over NFL picking Bad Bunny for Super Bowl halftime show

Read: Judge pauses Trump administration’s VOA cuts in scathing order

HHS seeks to ban Harvard from federal funding in civil rights case

Netanyahu endorses Trump plan to end Gaza war

A government shutdown could delay news of next Social Security raise

Secret Service Arrests Man Attempting to Scale White House Fence

Ireland to Offer Migrant Families E10,000 to Drop Asylum Claims and Leave Country

Gov. Pritzker: Trump to Deploy National Guard amid Chicago Riots

Tom Cotton Drafts Bill to Shrink H-1B Visa Program

Louisiana governor requests 1,000 National Guard troops to fight violent crime wave across state

DOJ lawsuit claims Minnesota sanctuary policies allow ‘dangerous criminals’ to avoid removal

Massive comet zooming through solar system could be alien technology, Harvard astrophysicist says

Former DOGE staffer Edward Coristine describes brutal D.C. attack by teen gang: ‘Bunch of punches’

Illegal alien arrested by ICE found registered as active Democrat voter in blue state

Nicole Kidman, Keith Urban separate after 19 years of marriage: report

Report: Half of all US states don’t have enough money to pay their bills

Nevada is first state taken off Trump admin sanctuary state list

Florida man arrested for allegedly killing, cooking, and eating pet peacocks in bizarre revenge plot

Far-left gun club professor placed on leave after radical group exposed

First victim of Michigan LDS church shooting ID’d as 77-year-old Navy veteran

Ex-UK PM Tony Blair to help run Gaza under Trump’s peace plan 

Charlie Kirk wrote of his ‘deep love’ for Israel in letter to Netanyahu about how to counter rising opposition to the Jewish state in the US

Illegal Immigrant Superintendent Nabbed By ICE Helped Pass Policy Allowing Criminals To Be Hired In District

Paul Finebaum Admits ESPN ‘Killed’ Interview With Trump In 2019

John Fetterman Offers Brutal Response To Democrats Threatening Government Shutdown

Mike Johnson Says Schumer ‘Willing’ To Force Shutdown Because Someone Is ‘Coming For Him’

‘Her Picture Was Right There’: Father Of Logan Federico Slams Democrat Rep For Misnaming His Daughter

Trump Warns Mamdani: No Federal Cash For A ‘Communist’ Mayor

‘5 Alarm Fire’: Charlie Kirk Warned Bibi Of PR Crisis In Letter, Said He Had ‘Deep Love’ For Israel

What’s In Trump’s 20-Point Plan For ‘Eternal Peace In The Middle East’

How a Government Agency You've Never Heard of Censored Everyday Americans

Jimmy Kimmel has gotten a lot of attention in recent days. A new Senate report reveals how the Biden administration silenced Americans without the power to fight back.

 A new Senate report discusses the actions of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) under the Biden administration, revealing practices that some describe as censorship of American citizens. The report highlights incidents where the government reportedly directed social media platforms to remove content deemed as misinformation, raising concerns about First Amendment rights and government overreach.

1. Background of CISA's Actions: The report details an instance from October 2020, when a tweet warning against mail-in voting was flagged as misinformation by CISA. The agency acted quickly, contacting Twitter to have the tweet removed, demonstrating its involvement in regulating social media content during the election period.

2. CISA's Communications with Media Platforms: Since its establishment, CISA has held meetings with social media companies regarding misinformation. The agency encouraged state officials to report misleading posts, a practice termed "switchboarding," to facilitate content regulation.

3. Lack of Statutory Basis: The report states that CISA could not identify any legal basis for these actions, which included significant engagement with tech companies to manage information, raising questions about its authority and accountability.

4. Former CISA Director's Defense: Jen Easterly, CISA's former director, defended the agency's actions by emphasizing the importance of protecting the public from misinformation to safeguard critical infrastructure.

5. Government Censorship Allegations: Critics, including Senator Ted Cruz, argue that CISA's operations reflect a shift towards progressive censorship, disproportionately affecting conservative viewpoints. They suggest the current practices could threaten free speech and may set dangerous precedents for future governance.

6. Potential Misuse of Federal Power: The report indicates that the Biden administration utilized federal power to silence dissent, with minimal pushback from political allies. It emphasizes a need for increased oversight of federal agencies to prevent misuse of their authorities.

7. Historical Context of CISA: CISA was created with bipartisan support in 2018 to protect critical infrastructure. However, the report shows a shift in its operations, which now appear focused on controlling speech rather than solely protecting against cybersecurity threats.

8. Future Implications: As discussions evolve around new regulations for online content and artificial intelligence, the report cautions that CISA's experiences should inform legislative efforts to ensure agencies remain accountable and do not overreach.

The Senate report on CISA's activities raises significant concerns about the balance between national security, misinformation management, and free speech. It calls for greater congressional oversight to prevent the misuse of agency powers in regulating public discourse, particularly in the context of upcoming discussions on artificial intelligence and online content moderation.

https://freebeacon.com/america/how-a-government-agency-youve-never-heard-of-censored-everyday-americans/

Inconvenient Facts at the UN

The facts presented by Trump and Netanyahu were terribly uncomfortable for the UN gaggle to hear. The world ignores them at its peril.

At the United Nations General Assembly in September 2025, President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu shared crucial information that challenged the status quo, exposing uncomfortable truths regarding international conflicts and the role of the UN. Despite the seriousness of their statements, it is suggested that these declarations will likely be disregarded by the UN.

1. Netanyahu's Position on Gaza: Netanyahu emphasized that Israel's military actions in Gaza would continue until all hostages are released. His address underlined the urgency of the situation and Israel’s determination to finish the job it started.

2. Trump’s Critique of the UN: Trump opened his speech by criticizing the UN’s performance in resolving conflicts. He mentioned his efforts in stopping wars, arguing that effective resolutions were achieved without UN assistance, specifically highlighting the ongoing conflict with Hamas.

3. Hamas and Palestinian Statehood: Trump condemned the notion of recognizing a Palestinian state while Hamas retains hostages, labeling it a reward for their violence. He insisted on a unified message demanding their immediate release.

4. The Ukraine Conflict: Trump discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, criticizing NATO nations for still buying Russian energy while the country faces severe troop losses.

5. Illegal Immigration: Trump pointed to the UN as a contributor to the immigration crisis, arguing that it funds migration into Western countries without providing solutions to the issues it creates. This, he claimed, would lead to the decline of Western nations due to uncontrolled immigration and misguided energy policies.

6. Climate Change Criticism: Trump described climate change policies as a significant deception affecting global stability, stating that such approaches threaten the freedom and success of Western nations.

7. Netanyahu on Regional Threats: Netanyahu recapped Israel's military success against various hostile entities, including Iran and Hamas, claiming significant damage to their capabilities. He thanked Trump for his assistance, particularly in neutralizing nuclear threats.

8. Hostage Situation: Netanyahu took a moment to address the hostages held in Gaza, informing them that they have not been forgotten and reiterating Israel's commitment to their return.

The speeches from Trump and Netanyahu during the UN General Assembly highlighted critical issues that the international community must confront, including terrorism, immigration crises, and Western responses to global conflicts. Their facts and assertions demand attention, suggesting that failing to acknowledge these realities could have severe consequences for global stability and security. 

https://spectator.org/inconvenient-facts-at-the-un/

No deal in talks to avoid shutdown as parties blame each other

Democrats want up to $1.4 trillion. 

The top four congressional leaders met with President Trump to discuss a government funding solution, but they made little progress, increasing the risk of a government shutdown on Wednesday.

• Negotiations between Republicans and Democrats have stalled since Senate Democrats blocked a short-term funding bill.

• Republicans proposed a Continuing Resolution to extend current funding until November 21 to allow time for budget discussions.

• Democrats oppose this plan, demanding that it includes health care measures, especially regarding the expiration of the enhanced Obamacare Premium Tax Credit. Their counter-proposal, which included significant health care spending, was also blocked.

• Vice President J. D. Vance criticized Democrats for linking policy disagreements to government funding and suggested that they should discuss health care in an open government context.

• Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed hope that Trump could help bridge the gap but emphasized the need for Republican willingness to negotiate.

• Senator John Thune accused Democrats of holding the funding process hostage, stating that they are the main obstacle to preventing a shutdown.

The conflicting demands from both parties have left the government funding negotiations at a standstill, raising concerns about an imminent shutdown.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b4318cc1-1fe6-4d8b-a2db-e422646c4f3f.html

9 Signs That the United States and NATO Are Both Preparing for War

Tensions between the United States, NATO, and Russia are escalating, indicated by various military preparations and strategic decisions. This summary outlines nine significant signs suggesting that America and NATO may be gearing up for direct involvement in the conflict with Russia, particularly regarding Ukraine.

1. Authorization for Ukraine Strikes: Keith Kellogg, a military advisor, confirmed that President Trump authorized Ukraine to conduct long-range missile strikes deep into Russian territory.

2. Increased Missile Production: The Pentagon is urging U. S. missile manufacturers to significantly increase their production rates due to concerns over low stockpiles for potential conflicts, especially with China.

3. Potential Missile Deliveries to Ukraine: Vice President JD Vance stated that the U. S. is considering sending long-range Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, which could reach Moscow, to pressure Russia for negotiations.

4. Russian Military Conscription: Russia announced a conscription of 135,000 men by the end of 2025, marking its largest military draft in nine years, which signals growing military readiness.

5. Denmark's Reservist Call-Up: Denmark has mobilized hundreds of reservists in response to unidentified drones in its airspace, indicating heightened military alertness.

6. NATO's Increased Vigilance: NATO confirmed enhanced surveillance and defense presence in the Baltic Sea following recent intrusions, suggesting a readiness to respond to threats.

7. Preparation for Mass Casualties in France: French hospitals are instructed to prepare for a potential armed conflict by March 2026, expecting to handle thousands of casualties.

8. Germany's Medical Readiness: Germany's armed forces are planning to treat up to 1,000 wounded troops per day in the event of a large-scale conflict.

9. Military Meeting in Virginia: President Trump has called an all-hands meeting at a military base in Virginia with top commanders, stirring speculation about serious military readiness or plans.

The collection of these signs illustrates a concerning trend towards potential military conflict involving the United States and NATO, particularly in relation to Russia and Ukraine. The implications of these developments are significant, pointing towards a possibility of escalation in the ongoing tensions. The year 2025 could witness intensified confrontations, with many citizens seemingly unaware of the impending crisis. 

https://americafirstreport.com/9-signs-that-the-united-states-and-nato-are-both-preparing-for-war/

Former Biden Aide Tells Democrats That ‘Mamdani Could Be A Major Noose Around Our Necks’

 Former Biden aide Michael LaRosa expressed concern over the Democratic Party's connection to far-left candidates like New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. He warns that this association could jeopardize their performance in the 2026 elections.

• LaRosa believes Mamdani may become a political burden for Democrats in important swing districts.

• He suggests Republicans will use Mamdani's candidacy to link all Democrats, regardless of their political stance, to extreme views.

• Matt Schlapp, Chairman of the Conservative Political Action Conference, echoed these concerns, noting confusion among Democratic leaders regarding Mamdani's endorsement.

• Some leading Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have not endorsed Mamdani, with Jeffries citing disagreements over Israel.

• Kamala Harris, the last Democratic presidential nominee, offered lukewarm support, acknowledging Mamdani's candidacy but emphasizing that he is "not the only star" in the party.

• Despite the mixed reactions, Mamdani has received endorsements from notable Democrats, such as New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Representative Jerrold Nadler.

The Democratic Party faces challenges related to its association with candidates like Mamdani, which could impact their electoral outcomes in the upcoming midterms.

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2025/09/29/former-biden-aide-tells-democrats-that-mamdani-could-be-a-major-noose-around-our-necks/

Democrats Who Voted Against Funding Government Are Suddenly Hysterical About ‘Harm’ Shutdown Would Unleash

House Democrats express concern over the potential impact of a government shutdown while having recently voted against a Republican funding plan.

• Shutdown Warnings: Democratic lawmakers, including Rep. Henry Cuellar, highlight the harmful effects of a potential government shutdown, stressing that it endangers essential services, disaster relief, and federal employees.

• Voting Dynamics: Despite their concerns, 211 Democrats, including Cuellar, opposed a Republican-supported seven-week funding plan. Only Rep. Jared Golden broke ranks to support the measure.

• Demands for Concessions: Democrats called for significant spending increases on healthcare programs, which Republicans rejected as unreasonable.

• Consequences for Key Groups: Cuellar warned that vital services for border patrol agents and veterans would be interrupted by a shutdown, although the funding measure he opposed would have provided crucial support to these services.

• Political Context: Cuellar faces potential electoral challenges due to recent redistricting in Texas. Additionally, he has legal issues, having been indicted for bribery and money laundering, which complicate his standing.

• Senate Dynamics: The government is at risk of shutting down unless Senate Democrats approve the Republican funding bill. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has indicated a willingness to allow a shutdown if demands for policy changes are not met.

• Further Criticism: Rep. Eugene Vindman criticized House Republicans for purportedly prioritizing political tactics over bipartisan cooperation needed to finalize the budget.

Current tensions in Congress highlight the complexities surrounding the government funding discussions. While many Democratic leaders express urgency to prevent a shutdown, their votes against proposed funding solutions present a contradiction that complicates the situation further. The impending deadline for funding solutions looms, intensifying the political maneuvering in Washington. 

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2025/09/29/democrats-government-funding-shutdown-henry-cuellar-eugene-vindman/

SCOTUS Case Could Empower the President With More Control Over Executive Agencies

The Supreme Court is set to hear a significant case that may change the balance of power between the president and independent federal agencies. This case arose from President Trump's dismissal of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and could allow greater presidential authority over agency officials.

1. Background of the Case:

• The situation began when President Trump fired FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, a Biden appointee.

• Slaughter argued that her dismissal was unlawful under the precedent established by the 1935 case, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, which protected agency officials from being removed without cause.

2. Historical Precedent:

• The Humphrey's Executor case ruled that the president could not dismiss FTC Commissioner William Humphrey solely for policy disagreements because the FTC performs functions that are not purely executive.

• This case has historically allowed FTC officials to serve fixed terms unless they are found guilty of inefficiency, neglect, or wrongdoing.

3. Concerns Over Accountability:

• Critics believe that the current setup creates unaccountable power centers within the executive branch, allowing officials to pursue their agendas without president oversight.

• Legal analysts argue that the Constitution establishes the president as the head of the executive branch and should have control over its operations.

4. Recent Developments:

• The Supreme Court granted a temporary order to support Trump’s firing of Slaughter while agreeing to hear the case, indicating potential changes to presidential removal power.

• The court’s willingness to explore this issue follows a pattern of decisions that suggest a shift towards empowering the executive branch.

5. Potential Impacts of a Ruling:

• If the court decides to narrow or overturn the Humphrey's Executor precedent, it could have wide-ranging effects beyond the FTC, potentially influencing agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

• This would allow future presidents to more easily reverse policies and make changes within these agencies.

6. Unitary Executive Theory:

• The case aligns with the "unitary executive theory," which asserts the president's total control over the executive branch. Proponents claim that this is essential for efficient governance.

• Chief Justice John Roberts has previously noted that barriers preventing the president from supervising executives can lead to governance issues.

7. Court’s Agendas and Considerations:

• The court is set to hear arguments in December 2025, and the decision could reshape how future presidents manage federal agencies.

• There is potential for increased accountability and streamlined government operations if agencies are aligned more closely with presidential priorities.

The Supreme Court's upcoming decision on the ability of the president to dismiss officials from independent federal agencies could significantly alter the administrative landscape. By potentially reshaping the authority of the executive branch, this case reflects ongoing debates about accountability, governance, and the balance of power within the U. S. government. The implications are vast, impacting not only the FTC but potentially other federal bodies as well. 

https://americafirstreport.com/scotus-case-could-empower-the-president-with-more-control-over-executive-agencies/

How the Fourteenth Amendment Empowers Judicial Activism

The Fourteenth Amendment, originally designed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves, has become a significant part of U. S. federal law. Some argue that its contemporary interpretation has led to judicial activism, diverting from its original purpose. This summary discusses the key arguments regarding the transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its implications for the judicial system.

1. Original Purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment:

• The Fourteenth Amendment was established after the Civil War to ensure equal legal protection for freed slaves, primarily to safeguard them from oppressive laws, known as Black Codes, that attempted to subjugate them again.

2. Judicial Activism:

• Raoul Berger's work argues that judges are using the Fourteenth Amendment as a platform for broader social and political changes rather than fulfilling their role of constitutional interpretation.

• The courts have treated the Fourteenth Amendment as a flexible tool for promoting ideals of racial equality, which can lead to significant changes in law and policy.

3. Incorporation Doctrine:

• Progressive courts have incorporated elements of the Bill of Rights into the Fourteenth Amendment. This allows federal courts to intervene in state matters under the guise of enforcing civil rights.

• Critics point out that the incorporation doctrine lacks a constitutional basis and has led to greater federal power over states, potentially undermining individual liberty.

4. Impact of Federal Power:

• The centralization of power in federal courts, as highlighted by David Gordon, may restrict state independence and individual freedoms rather than enhance them.

• The historical context shows that the original aim was to protect specific rights of freedmen, not to create a broad federal oversight over state policies.

5. Misuse of Legislative Acts:

• Justice Clarence Thomas has noted the transformation of laws intended for specific historical emergencies, like the Ku Klux Klan Act, into tools for federal judicial expansion beyond their original scope.

• This suggests that emergency measures, originally meant to address immediate threats, are being exploited for ongoing federal authority.

6. Critiques and Advocacy:

• Critics of judicial activism argue that the courts have disregarded the historical context and intentions behind the Fourteenth Amendment. By distorting its meaning, they pose a threat to the framework of individual rights and state autonomy.

• Advocates of progressive judicial actions may argue that this subversion serves a good cause, which points to a shifting justification of legal interpretations over time.

7. Continuing Debate:

• The interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment has led to significant legal battles over civil rights, school policies, and state legislation.

• Ongoing discussions regarding judicial interpretations reflect broader ideological divisions about the role of the judiciary and the limits of federal power.

The Fourteenth Amendment's transformation from a protector of the rights of former slaves to a vehicle for judicial activism raises critical questions about state sovereignty and individual liberties. As the debate continues, the tension between judicial interpretation and original intent remains a significant issue in the U. S. legal landscape. The use of the Fourteenth Amendment in modern court rulings illustrates the complexities and consequences of interpreting constitutional provisions in evolving sociopolitical contexts. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-fourteenth-amendment-empowers-judicial-activism

Fact Checking Trump’s Climate Claims

President Donald Trump delivered a speech at the United Nations that focused on global warming, drawing significant attention and criticism. His claims have been challenged as false by many, particularly regarding climate science. This summary examines Trump's comments and their rebuttals, as outlined by the I&I Editorial Board.

1. Global Warming Claims as "Hoax":

• Trump referred to the global warming narrative as a "hoax," suggesting that it stems from academic deception and exaggerated claims aimed at influencing public opinion.

2. Critique of Renewable Energy:

• He declared that renewable energy sources are not effective and overly expensive. Although it's acknowledged that renewables face reliability issues, the assertion that they are entirely ineffective is considered an exaggeration.

3. Predictions from Climate Scientists:

• Trump criticized various climate predictions made by organizations like the UN, labeling them as incorrect and made by "stupid people. " While the speech insinuates ill-intent from scientists, critics argue this portrayal is unfair and lacking in evidence.

4. Deemphasis on Fossil Fuels and Capitalism:

• Trump suggested that the push for reducing fossil fuel usage is not primarily about environmental concerns but instead aims to undermine capitalism. This claim reflects a broader conspiracy theory regarding the motives behind climate policies.

5. Issues with Wind and Solar Power:

• He described wind turbines as ineffective and referenced numerous blocked renewable energy projects, implying a global retreat from renewable investments due to their impractical nature.

6. Rebranding Climate Change:

• Trump noted that the term "climate change" has been adopted to encompass all weather variations, criticizing it as a tactic to avoid accountability for failed climate predictions.

7. Counterarguments from the Media:

• Media fact-checkers have countered Trump's assertions, stating that a consensus exists among scientists regarding human-caused climate change and its risks. The board contests this by arguing that science should not rely on consensus and claiming that data supporting climate change is misrepresented.

8. Political Impact of Trump's Election:

• The editorial claims that Trump's election has led to a decrease in the influence of global warming advocates, crediting him for a shift in the climate debate.

The I&I Editorial Board presents strong opposition to mainstream climate science based on Trump's assertions at the UN, arguing against the validity of climate change predictions and portraying the push towards renewable energy as largely ineffective and politically motivated. While Trump's comments have ignited debate, the alignment with his views by the editorial board emphasizes a growing divide in public perception regarding climate science and policy. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/30/fact-checking-trumps-climate-claims/

US Department of Labor launches Project Firewall to protect America’s highly skilled workforce

The U.S. Department of Labor today announced the launch of Project Firewall, an H-1B enforcement initiative that will safeguard the rights, wages, and job opportunities of highly skilled American workers by ensuring employers prioritize qualified Americans when hiring workers and holding employers accountable if they abuse the H-1B visa process.

“The Trump Administration is standing by our commitment to end practices that leave Americans in the dust. As we reestablish economic dominance, we must protect our most valuable resource: the American worker. Launching Project Firewall will help us ensure no employers are abusing H-1B visas at the expense of our workforce,” said U.S. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer. “By rooting out fraud and abuse, the Department of Labor and our federal partners will ensure that highly skilled jobs go to Americans first.”

As authorized by federal law, the department will conduct investigations of employers through Project Firewall to maximize H-1B program compliance. To achieve this goal, the Secretary of Labor will personally certify the initiation of investigations for the first time in the department’s history. This historic action leverages existing authority granted to the Secretary if reasonable cause exists that an H-1B employer not in compliance. 

Secretary-certified investigations, as well as other H-1B-related investigations, are important tools the department will use in Project Firewall to hold employers accountable and protect the rights of American workers. Violations may result in the collection of back wages owed to affected workers, the assessment of civil money penalties, and/or debarment from future use of the H-1B program for a prescribed period of time. 

Additionally, the department will share information and coordinate with relevant government agencies, as permitted by law, to combat discrimination against American workers and ensure the law is properly enforced by leveraging the full force of the federal government.  

https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/osec/osec20250919

GUESS WHO’S NOT ABOVE THE LAW? MI SOS Benson In The Hot Seat After DOJ Sues Her For Blocking Access to Michigan’s Dirty Voter Rolls

 The U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a lawsuit against Michigan's Democratic Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson. This legal action stems from accusations that she has hindered access to complete voter registration records, a move seen as obstructing transparency in elections.

• Legal Action against Benson: The DOJ's Civil Rights Division is suing Benson, claiming she is violating federal law by not providing necessary voter registration documents. This lawsuit is part of a broader initiative targeting six states—California, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania—for similar non-compliance with requests for voter registration data.

• Importance of Voter Rolls: The DOJ emphasizes that maintaining clean voter rolls is crucial for free and fair elections. Attorney General Pamela Bondi specifically stated that every state must ensure accurate electoral records.

• Benson's Response: Jocelyn Benson has publicly ridiculed the DOJ's demands, arguing that releasing personal information about Michigan residents is an unlawful overreach. She insists on protecting the privacy of over 8 million state residents.

• Previous Lawsuits and Challenges: Benson’s voter roll maintenance practices have faced scrutiny before. A past federal court ruling dismissed a lawsuit by the Republican National Committee (RNC) claiming that Benson failed to keep accurate voter rolls. The ruling noted discrepancies, such as having more active registered voters than eligible adult residents in many counties.

• Allegations of Impropriety: Critics argue that Benson is trying to conceal issues surrounding voter registrations, referring to her mismanagement during the 2020 election and her failure to maintain the integrity of voter registration records. Detractors point out that she has created laws that, in their view, undermine election integrity.

• Ongoing Concerns About Integrity: The controversy surrounding Benson has raised alarms about election integrity, with many Michigan residents expressing concern over perceived irregularities in voter registration and voting procedures. There have been allegations of allowing unvetted "overseas voters" to participate in elections, further eroding public trust.

• State Responses to Federal Demands: Michigan’s Secretary of State has reportedly ignored requests from state lawmakers for greater transparency, maintaining a stance of defiance against the DOJ’s legal pressure.

The DOJ's lawsuit against Jocelyn Benson highlights ongoing tensions regarding voter registration practices in Michigan. The case underscores the importance of maintaining accurate voter rolls for electoral integrity while raising concerns over privacy and governmental power. As this legal battle unfolds, it poses questions about the future of election management in Michigan and public confidence in the electoral process. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/guess-whos-not-above-law-mi-sos-benson/

"War Is Peace, Ignorance is Strength and (By the Way) I am Striking Your Motion from the Record”

 How language is manipulated in the legal system, particularly regarding the terms used and the actions of judges. It explores the concept of language inversion and how it affects perceptions of justice and truth.

1. Language Manipulation:

• The article highlights the deliberate misuse of language in legal contexts, emphasizing how terms like "fascism" have lost their intended meanings in political discourse.

• References are made to essays by Karthik Karunakaran and George Orwell about the dilution of the term "fascist" and its use as a weapon in political arguments.

2. Obfuscation in Courts:

• The author argues that similar language manipulation occurs within court systems, where terms that suggest protection and care often mask harmful practices, specifically in adult guardianships that are intended to safeguard the elderly.

• These practices have led to asset theft and medical abuse against vulnerable individuals, which contrast starkly with their intended purpose.

3. Judicial Corruption:

• The author discusses cases involving judges who are purportedly involved in corrupt practices, such as accepting bribes through fraudulent home loans.

• The illustration provided focuses on Judge Upinder Kalra, who allegedly dismissed a motion to recuse him after concerns were raised regarding his financial activities and unprofessional behavior towards attorneys.

4. Specific Cases and Responses:

• The article presents the efforts of attorney Paul Cook, who is attempting to remove Judge Kalra from overseeing his case due to irregularities and bias.

• Despite multiple declarations from other attorneys regarding Judge Kalra’s behavior, he rejected the motion by claiming it was "untimely" and lacked legal grounds.

• Cook is moving forward with an appeal against this decision.

5. Implications of Language and Actions:

• The article draws parallels between the language used by the judiciary and George Orwell's concepts from ‘1984’, asserting that the dismissal of legal motions reflects an Orwellian approach to truth and justice.

• A focus is placed on the financial dealings of Judge Kalra, which raises questions about his integrity and the legality of his actions.

6. Conclusion about Judicial Accountability:

• The final parts of the article suggest a systemic issue within the judicial system, where judges may protect each other's misconduct, particularly regarding elder abuse cases.

• It stresses the need for greater scrutiny and accountability in the legal system to ensure that justice is served rather than obscured.

The article raises critical questions about the integrity of the judicial system in the United States, focusing on language manipulation, inappropriate behaviors of judges, and the resulting effects on vulnerable populations, especially the elderly. It calls for scrutiny of judicial practices to prevent corruption and ensure the protection of rights.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2025-09-26/inversion-language-war-peace-ignorance-strength-and-way-i-am-striking-your-motion

If Socialists Actually Understood Socialism

 The growing popularity of socialism in America, highlighted by figures like Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gaining traction in political conversations. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the true nature and implications of socialism.

1. Current Political Climate: Recent elections and the rise of self-identified socialists indicate a shift in American political discourse, particularly among younger adults. A Pew Research Center study shows that 36% of U. S. adults aged 18 to 29 view socialism positively.

2. Misunderstanding of Socialism: Friedrich von Hayek’s quote suggests that socialists lack a full understanding of economics, which leads to misconceptions about socialism itself. True socialism advocates for public ownership of the means of production by the community or state, not by private individuals.

3. Reality of Economic Systems: Every economic system, including capitalism and socialism, seeks to ration resources. The focus should not just be on ownership but on how decisions regarding resources are made.

4. Shifting Focus: Many advocates of socialism skip over the principle of collective ownership and instead demand redistribution of the outputs of production, such as goods and services, which misrepresents true socialist ideals.

5. Redistribution vs. Ownership: The debate has shifted to control over outputs instead of means of production. Many who identify as socialists express desires for "free" services and goods without a foundational understanding of wealth creation.

6. Policies Indicating Control: Policies linked to socialism, such as socialized healthcare and welfare benefits, primarily concern the distribution of goods rather than collective ownership of production resources.

7. Perceptions of Wealth: There is a prevailing argument that wealth redistribution is needed due to the concentration of wealth among a few individuals. However, this raises questions about the fairness of claiming a "right" to someone else’s earnings.

8. Misconceptions about Wealth Creation: Thomas Sowell noted that wealth can be redistributed, but the ability to create wealth is not guaranteed. Historical examples show that confiscated wealth does not typically yield sustainable prosperity for those who inherit it without the necessary skills or resources to maintain it.

9. Capital vs. Money: The article argues that treating money as the only form of wealth overlooks the importance of knowledge, skills, and entrepreneurship. The combination of various factors, not just money, drives economic prosperity.

The article argues that many modern discussions around socialism depart from its original ideology, focusing instead on desires for consumption rather than production. True socialism emphasizes collective ownership, which is often overlooked in current debates. The challenge lies in educating individuals about the real implications of these economic systems and their long-term effects on society. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/if-socialists-actually-understood-socialism-0