Following the controversy of the 2000 Presidential election, the United States formed a bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform.
After almost five years of research, the group published its final report - "Building Confidence in U.S. Elections." It offered a series of recommendations to reduce voter fraud, including enacting voter-ID laws and limiting absentee voting.
A judge voided the results and ordered the city to hold a new election due to "a pattern of fraudulent, intentional, and criminal conduct." The results were reversed in the subsequent election.
Election officials noticed irregularities in the mail-in votes and refused to certify the election, citing evidence and "Claims of concerted fraudulent activities." The state ordered a special election the following year.
A state judge later ordered a new vote, finding that the May election "Was not the fair, free and full expression of the intent of the voters. It was rife with mail in vote procedural violations constituting nonfeasance and malfeasance." In Wisconsin, the April 2020 primary election offered further evidence of the challenges and corruption surrounding mail-in voting.
The New York Times reported: "Wisconsin Democrats are working to export their template for success - intense digital outreach and a well-coordinated vote-by-mail operation - to other states in the hope that it will improve the party's chances in local and statewide elections and in the quest to unseat President Trump in November." Scores of other reports of election fraud came forward as the Democratic Party used the pretext of Covid to reshape American elections.
Citizens lost faith in their election process, and political leaders readily admitted that their concerns were justified; but the professional politicos and their mouthpiece, the New York Times, characterized the disaster as a "Template for success." The stakes of the election could not be more stark.
No comments:
Post a Comment