An Insider Describes the Medical Field

There would be little consideration for ideas such as expressed by John “Birdman” Bryant: “There is no reason to suppress a viewpoint unless it is true.” To be fair, few in any endeavor will stick their neck out when threatened, especially physicians, pinned under large educational debt, years spent in specialized training, potential loss of licensure, and for most no other way to make a living commensurate with that obtained through the practice of medicine.

The corporation leased the property from the local hospital, which became part of a different medical center’s merger-acquisition process of folding in smaller hospitals.

My specialty changed, as others did, from offering a lifetime certification to one that was time-limited, requiring retesting every ten years, further picking our pockets to reassure the public of our “quality.” My first round was a written day-long exam at a testing center fifty miles away, followed months later by an oral exam administered by eight examiners in a remote city.

The two years of pandemic hysteria and rollout of the “vaccine” allowed me to go farther along a path I had started down well over a decade earlier, once medical training had ended, debt cleared, and financial stability was in sight.

After completing the final two years of medical school, I entered a one-year internship program.

Why question historical narratives only when medical “science” also offered much that appeared sketchy? It became glaringly obvious that most physicians toed the party line in what to accept or question.

But in less than five years, a physician group in a different specialty with the assistance of a local hospital decided to encroach on mine and compete against me.

For those, this quote by Pat Shannon would not resonate: “Who is more dangerous: the liar or the people who believe the lies?” Questioning the only accepted mechanisms of infection and contagion, formulation of medical definitions, laboratory testing methods, the basis of virology, electron microscopy, and vaccine development and effectiveness and side effects was a heresy to many.

My attorney would not disclose to me the why, but reason dictated that my competition was somehow “protected.” With an unrestrained “competitor,” the practice I ran dried up over time, and in several years, it was forced to close.

Shouldn’t the director be knowledgeable about existing case law? For this medical practice, just as the last, there would be no help from D.C. My building was landlocked, and access was sporadically problematic. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/11/an_insider_describes_the_medical_field.html