The legislative and executive branches will have unlimited power over The People if The People cannot bring cases against those branches because judges allow Standing Doctrine as an excuse to avoid hearing a case involving controversial subject matter.
The doctrine of standing and other Dismissal Doctrines have been used to deny The People our most foundational right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, id est, access the courts for dispute resolution.
Given the imminence of a historic election, a recent petition to the Supreme Court is explored here in the context of standing.
A Petition for Writ of Mandamus regarding state election processes was filed on October 16, 2024 in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Replying via text message to an inquiry regarding status, Bradford Geyer, Founder of FFF, responded, "All Secretaries of State" were served "By email on Thursday October 17, 2024." Geyer added, "On Saturday we sent by certified return receipt requestedthat they should receive today [10/22/2024] at the latest." A Writ of Mandamus is "An order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion." The All Writs Act by Act of Congress establishes the authority for the Supreme Court and all courts to issue writs of mandamus.
FFF's petition, summarized, is a request for the Supreme Court to order all 50 states to use "Absolute voter identification, paper ballots and hand counting for the 2024 general elections" FFF asserts that serious election issues currently involve "Vulnerabilities in voter registration, voter verification, vote tabulation, vote reporting, mass media electioneering, and social media censorship." Particularized evidence in the petition includes that voter rolls are compromised, illegal aliens are registered to vote and have voted, voting machine software and hardware cannot be made secure from hacking, and election workers have been threatened and intimidated to certify the results regardless of witnessing irregularities.
The Court will violate their duty to The People and undermine their primary mission if they opt for allowing a redressability dismissal motion based on the inability to achieve perfect compliance in that absolutely no ineligible voter will vote.
If the Supreme Court wishes to avoid hearing FFF's petition, they will have to allow some type of Dismissal Doctrine, which will be violative of the most foundational right in the US Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment