Dr. McCullough says: "This act of medical censorship occurred after the paper met all the criteria for listing on the Lancet Preprint Server This speaks to the importance of our findings as the largest summary of autopsies after COVID-19 vaccination. Elsevier and Lancet are trying to suppress critical scientific observations on COVID-19 vaccine safety. Their actions are reprehensible." The Lancet was not alone in its rejection of the study.
"This is not outside the normal bounds of hot summer weather. Yes, it's a record year. It could be one of the hottest, but here's the thing Joe Biden's EPA has a chart of the heatwave index going back to the 1930s. The 1930s are probably 8 to 10 or 12 times hotter in the United States than anything we're currently seeing." Not only did Biden's EPA show that the 1930s heat waves were worse than such waves today, many studies have shown that the Roman Warming Period and the Medieval Warm Period were as warm or warmer than today.
Evidently the Medieval warming period proved too much an inconvenient fact as the data was altered and, ultimately, erased.
Geologist Dr. David Deming of the Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy at the University of Oklahoma in a statement to a US Senate Committee of Environment and Public Works in 2006 recounts that in 1995 he received an email from a major researcher in climate change who said, "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warming Period." Sadly, Michael Mann, and his fraudulent hockey stick graph, erased it by his omission of this well-documented period as well as the Little Ice Age, both of which contradicted the scope of his narrow, deceitful graph.
Rew Dessler of Texas A&M University has difficulty with anything contradicting the notion that today's weather must be warmer than anything in the past.
Besides the work of truly informed and battle-ready warriors like Mark Morano and Tom Heller, who take on the backward forces of climate alarmism, by 2009 there were 31,478 American scientists who had taken a stand against unfounded climate alarmism and signed the Global Warming Petition Project.
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that the increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth." So much for the widely buzzed noise that 97% of climate scientists agree with views surrounding Anthropogenic Global Warming.
No comments:
Post a Comment