In September 2020, Professor Martin Neil received some anonymous emails providing hard evidence that the PCR tests for covid were never accurate or fit for purpose.
He sent me some long emails about the origins story of the so-called pandemic with a special focus on the virus and PCR testing.
The Instand report, co-authored by Drosten, which confirmed that PCR tests being used in labs worldwide were generating false positives of circa 9%. Revealing cross-reactivity and non-specificity of the PCR test, so that it picked up other coronaviruses A 9% PCR false positive rate sounds pretty high, doesn't it? Much higher than even sceptics had been postulating at the time.
Something had to be causing the false positives, and if it wasn't a deadly novel coronavirus then what was it? Well, the cross-reactivity and non-specificity of the PCR test maybe tell us the answer: other coronaviruses and perhaps other pathogens.
The next chapter in the story developed in early 2021 when I discovered that the UK government had been conducting bogus PCR testing in late 2020 and used it to push the covid wave in the run up the launch of the injections.
Basically, I revealed that the false positive rate for covid PCR testing was much higher than anyone could ever imagine in their worst nightmares - up to 65% of positive tests were false positives, by the ONS's own published statistics.
This evidence again pointed to the cross-reactivity and non-specificity of the PCR test.
https://expose-news.com/2023/03/16/emails-blow-the-covid-pcr-test-scam-out-of-the-water/
No comments:
Post a Comment