How bureaucrats are fighting the voters for control of our country
Donald Trump was elected president last November by winning 306 electoral votes. He pledged to "drain the swamp" in Washington, D.C., to overturn the system of politics that had left the nation's capital and major financial and tech centers flourishing but large swaths of the country mired in stagnation and decay. "What truly matters," he said in his Inaugural Address, "is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people."
Is it? By any historical and constitutional standard, "the people" elected Donald Trump and endorsed his program of nation-state populist reform. Yet over the last few weeks America has been in the throes of an unprecedented revolt. Not of the people against the government—that happened last year—but of the government against the people. What this says about the state of American democracy, and what it portends for the future, is incredibly disturbing.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-17/who-really-rules-united-states
Donald Trump was elected president last November by winning 306 electoral votes. He pledged to "drain the swamp" in Washington, D.C., to overturn the system of politics that had left the nation's capital and major financial and tech centers flourishing but large swaths of the country mired in stagnation and decay. "What truly matters," he said in his Inaugural Address, "is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people."
Is it? By any historical and constitutional standard, "the people" elected Donald Trump and endorsed his program of nation-state populist reform. Yet over the last few weeks America has been in the throes of an unprecedented revolt. Not of the people against the government—that happened last year—but of the government against the people. What this says about the state of American democracy, and what it portends for the future, is incredibly disturbing.
There is, of course,
the case of Michael Flynn. He made a lot of enemies inside the
government during his career, suffice it to say. And when he exposed
himself as vulnerable those enemies pounced. But consider the means:
anonymous and possibly illegal leaks of private conversations. Yes, the
conversation in question was with a foreign national. And no one doubts
we spy on ambassadors. But we aren't supposed to spy on Americans
without probable cause. And we most certainly are not supposed to
disclose the results of our spying in the pages of the Washington Post because it suits a partisan or personal agenda.
Here was a case of current and former national
security officials using their position, their sources, and their
methods to crush a political enemy. And no one but supporters of the
president seems to be disturbed. Why? Because we are meant to believe
that the mysterious, elusive, nefarious, and to date unproven connection
between Donald Trump and the Kremlin is more important than the norms
of intelligence and the decisions of the voters.http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-17/who-really-rules-united-states
No comments:
Post a Comment