Saturday, October 8, 2016

Items Difficult For Some To Read And Believe 1

Some who read the below items will not want to believe what they are reading.  But, as always, the facts are just that, the facts.  I do not make this stuff up.  Meanwhile the mainstream media avoids as much as possible providing anything remotely reflecting poorly on any leftist politician (especially Hillary) but gleefully report anything negative regarding Republicans (especially Trump) or conservatives, whether true or not.  It does not take a rocket scientist to see the obvious. 

This item fits within the title of this posting.  While I do not agree with everything the author says, from my perspective he is mostly right as supported by a true and honest reading of history.  See what you think.  http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/the_problem_is_conservatives_acceptance_of_progressive_government.html

Previous notes have addressed the fact that the modern day Democrat party is a far cry from what it used to be.  This item proves the point.  Quote: "The Democrats, once the party of working people, are now a party dominated by environmentalists and multiculturalists. And I can prove it.  As we shall see, when Democrats must choose between their old loyalty, providing jobs for workers, and their new loyalty, favoring politically-correct constituency groups—they choose the PC groups."   And, "Perhaps it seems strange that a political party would lose interest in such an obvious political staple as economic growth. And yet if we look more closely, we can see, from the perspective of the new Democrats, that this economic neglect makes a kind of sense: We can note, for example, that the financial heart of the green movement is made up of billionaires; they have all the money they need—and, thanks to their donations, they have a disproportionate voice."    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/28/james-pinkerton-the-democrats-vs-the-deplorables-the-new-class-struggle-comes-to-the-midwest/

Finally people are waking up to this nonsense.  The public's disgust with leftist driven political correctness is growing among all sectors of society. Read this interesting piece.   http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2016/10/02/pushing-back-against-the-pc-madness-n2226684?  

This is not a quick react assessment but a reasoned and non-emotional assessment of the results of the first presidential debate.    http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2016/10/04/by-dennis-prager-n2227350?

Now tell me this does not smell to the high heavens.  Quote: "Department of Justice (DOJ) officials let the attorney for two of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s closest aides shape the FBI’s investigation into her private email server, including allowing the assistants to destroy official records and laptops.  Four leaders of key House and Senate oversight committees pointed to two June 10, 2016, letters Beth Wilkinson drafted in conjunction with DOJ officials saying the FBI could only review Clinton email archives dated between June 1, 2014, and Feb. 1, 2015, and maintained by the Colorado firm Platte River Networks. The letters also “memorialized” the FBI’s agreement allowing the Clinton aides to destroy their records and laptops.  “The Wilkinson letters raise serious questions about why DOJ would consent to such substantial limitations on the scope of its investigation, and how Director (James) Comey’s statements on the scope of the investigation comport with the reality of what the FBI was permitted to investigate,” the four told Attorney General Loretta Lynch in a letter made public Wednesday. “This is simply astonishing given the likelihood that evidence on the laptops would be of interest to congressional investigators.”   http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/05/doj-let-clinton-aides-lawyer-limit-fbis-investigation/   My question is why did the laptops even need to be destroyed.  That makes no sense whatever and only serves to raise concerns that lots of things are being hidden from us.

You have, no doubt, heard Hillary say that Trump does not have the right temperament to be president.  The obvious take away is that she does.  Check this out.  By many accounts her temperament is horrible to say the least.  This is a closed issue the within the mainstream media  They never touch upon her frequent profane outbursts because they know what repercussions will befall them if they did.  Here is a compendium of her horrible temper which of course she hides behind her public persona and her fake smile.    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/03/exclusive-linda-tripp-hillary-threw-hard-objects-bill-clinton/   I have read far too many accounts of her behavior behind closed doors to think they are false, unfounded rumors or made up to make her look bad.  This is who she is.

This piece suggests the abundance of evidence of criminal activity but the perpetrators have miraculously escaped prosecution.  Quote: "Peter Schweizer, the author of “Clinton Cash,” and WND’s Jerome Corsi, the author of “Partners in Crime,” joined in a televised panel Thursday with a former U.S. attorney and the lead investigator of Judicial Watch – the non-profit that exposed Hillary Clinton’s private email server – to provide the latest on two major Clinton scandals.  Corsi explained how Bill and Hillary Clinton each become worth more than $100 million dollars through a career of public service while former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova passionately laid out a case for removing FBI Director James Comey from his position for not referring charges to Attorney General Loretta Lynch in the bureau’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information DiGenova called it “one of the grossest miscarriages of justice” he’s ever seen in his long career of federal service."   http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/clinton-scandal-experts-reveal-latest-on-couples-crimes/

We have all heard Obama, Hillary and Kaine (during the VP debate) claim they put down the hammer on Iran's program with the Nuclear deal Obama struck.  Unfortunately that claim is no where near the truth. All three, the president, Hillary and Kaine are knowingly lying to us.  This piece lays out the details.  Quote: "The Obama administration argues the agreement establishes monitoring that enables the West to detect violations and restore sanctions if necessary.  Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri disagrees.  “It now seems certain that there really was no deal: Obama merely danced around the nuclear issue,” said Taheri in a column in the New York Post.  “What he wanted was a smoke screen behind which he could help the Iranian theocracy negotiate its way out of a severe political and economic crisis in exchange for endorsing Obama’s claim that he had prevented ‘yet another war’ in the Middle East. He wanted a photo op with another long-time enemy of the U.S., another Nobel Prize – or at least justification for the one he already has,” said Taheri, chairman of the Gatestone Institute.  “He failed on all fronts.”  Taheri quoted Ali-Akbar Saleh, the chief of the Iran Atomic Energy Agency, who said Iran’s nuclear program “remains intact.”  “We have done nothing that could not be undone with the turn of a screw.”   http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/iran-threatens-west-with-9-million-fighters/  Remember too that Obama has released $4 billion dollars to Iran which they even admit that some goes to support their terrorism efforts.

Hillary lovers will definitely not like what this piece reveals.  As Secretary of State she actually said these chilling words regarding Julian Assange, of wiki-leaks fame: "Can't we just drone this guy?'  And, "...after all he [Assange] is a relatively soft target, "walking around freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States."   https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562/photo/1?    Do you really want a person in the White House who is this callous about another human?  Not me!

Bill and Hillary lovers will not like this information either.    http://www.naturalnews.com/055514_Danney_Williams_Bill_Clinton_father.html?

The VP candidate debate provided insight into what the differences will be between a Clinton and Trump presidency.  As this piece notes, Kaine came off like a real condescending jerk.  It is true hers was not as abrasive as Kaine's.  Hers was more of a superior cockyness type of condescension during the first presidential debate.  Read this assessment.    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3822741/He-came-jerk-Tim-Kaine-s-70-interruptions-Mike-Pence-VP-debate-gives-Clinton-s-running-mate-low-marks-viewers.html   A Clinton/kaine White House would not be a pleasant place to work.

Now consider this revelation.  Quote: "The Clintons’ eponymous Foundation was one of the first organizations to commit to helping to rebuild in Haiti. However, much of their multimillion-dollar relief efforts amounted to little more than assisting with (and in some cases donating money directly to) the construction of luxury hotels in the country, including at least one Marriott franchise operation owned by the aforementioned owner of Digicel, Denis O’Brien.  Very recently, the former president of the Haitian Senate, Bernard Sansaricq, issued a statement blasting the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation. It reads: Sadly, when an earthquake rocked the nation of Haiti in 2010, corruption moved in faster than the help so desperately needed. Today, the people of Haiti are still suffering despite the billions of dollars that have flowed into the Clinton Foundation.  The Clintons exploited this terrible disaster to steal billions of dollars from the sick and starving people of Haiti. The world trusted the Clintons to help the Haitian people during their most desperate time of need and they were deceived.  The Clintons and their friends are richer today while millions still live in tents. The world deserves to know where the money went and why help was never sent."  http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/the-clintons-and-haiti-whats-the-real-story/  Now read this.  Another accounting of Clinton promises unfulfilled and lots of money flowing in different directions than promised. http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/02/exposed-the-corrupt-clinton-foundation-youve-never-heard-of/  

If you still do not think Obama is an out and out racist read this.  He has stooped so low in his racist behavior that it is fair to blame him for the racial mess in our country.   The sooner he leaves office the better our country will be.  Here is him stoking the racial flames.    http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/04/obama-administration-tells-black-parents-school-choices-racist/?   I have said it before and will again.  He is the worse president in our history by far.    

Do you think like this action turns Black Lives Matter and their leftist enablers into good, upstanding law abiding citizens?    http://eaglerising.com/37258/white-teen-in-critical-condition-after-saying-blue-lives-matter-video/
   
More skepticism of the manner in which the Clinton's charities operate.  This does not look very good from my perspective.  Quote: "Between 2007 and 2015, the Clintons have dished out $16,001,450 in total to charity. Of that amount, $15,769,000 went to the Clinton Family Foundation. From the family foundation, $5,812,000 was then funneled to the Clinton Foundation as of 2015—or 36 percent of all the total charitable giving since 2007 marked by the Clintons on their income tax returns.  The Clinton Family Foundation’s 2015 Form 990 was marked as completed on May 6, 2016. Howard Topaz, a New York-based partner at the law firm Hogan Lovells who completed the form, told the Free Beacon that he submitted it to the IRS around this time. However, it does not appear to be publicly available as of now.  Clinton’s campaign did not return a request for comment on the amount that was kicked from the Clinton Family Foundation to the Clinton Foundation by press time."   http://freebeacon.com/politics/57-clintons-charitable-giving-2015-went-clinton-foundation/


No comments: