The link below is a
thoughtful and provocative piece. I agree with most of what is covered
but not everything. Specifically, I disagree with the author's
characterization that it is the democrats that are the problem - their
refusal to negotiate on a goodly number of republican proposals to
resolve the government shut down, deal with the federal debt and
Obamacare. It is instead the progressive elements within both the
Democratic and Republican parties that are the problem. Many democrats
are wary of the progressive influences that dominate their party. But
it is a fact that the democratic party is the home of far more
progressives than the republicans so that is where the intransigence
lies. Hence, the theme of the linked article. Because the bulk
of leadership within the democratic party happens to be progressives
getting past the current issue of restarting government, dealing with
the debt limit and on to Obamacare will be most difficult. As the
article notes the democrats (progressives) think they own the
government. Democrats and even some republicans lambaste the Tea
Party's influence on the repulican party. The fact is that the Tea
Party believes that the federal debt and government spending are out of
control and that Obamacare will only exacerbate those problems. So the
progressive left has its world view (big government is good, spending is
not out of control, debt is good, etc.) and the Tea Party right
believes the opposite. The progressive left frequently calls Tea Party
adherents tyrants, terrorists, etc.. That is an affront to ligitimately
held beliefs. What if they called the progressive left such names?
Who would be more correct?
Saying the above
things about progressives does not mean that all progressive thoughts
and actions are unworthy. Not so. The movement has done good things
over time. The problem is that progressives seek to place all faith and
power in government. In effect they believe the government is supreme
and has the right to dictate policy to its citizens. A consequence of
such thinking is to drain private citizen resources in pursuit of their
Utopian ideas. And because their thinking, especially progressive
dominated government, they assume private citizens and organizations on
their own are unable to "innovate" and "improve" the lives of their
fellow citizens. Only progressive minded government can do that. Not
only does past history demonstrate that to be a falsehood but also
validates such thinking as being socialistic in nature. To paraphrase
Margaret Thatcher: Socialism does not work for the long term because
socialist governments eventually run out of other people's money. Again
history validates that fact. Nonetheless that is what is happening to
us. Progressive driven programs have caused our government to grow so
big and unwieldy that it can neither efficiently and effectively manage
the programs it implements. Worse yet the money is drying up.
Progressives have demonstrated that they cannot effectively and efficiently manage the tax resources forcefully taken from us. Hence their penchant for borrowing seemingly without regard for eventual consequences. As budget and debt limit battles show they apparently cannot fathom our objections to an ever increasing tax load and unbounded national debt neither of which we asked for, but no thanks to them we are responsible for.
http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/09/democrats-to-america-we-own-the-government/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment