In
the New Year’s edition of the O’Reilly Factor, Bill O’Reilly
did in his inimitable way what no other network journalist has had the
wisdom or courage to do. He explained that the outcome of the presidential
election hinged on the votes of welfare state beneficiaries. In other
words, consistent with virtually every prior presidential election,
economic self-interest largely determined each person’s vote.
It was in the perceived self-interest of tens of millions of Americans
now on food stamps, on welfare, on social security, on Medicaid, and
on Medicare to vote for that candidate who pledged to keep intact all
welfare programs in perpetuity (indeed, to expand them) despite the
reality that the costs of those entitlements vastly exceed the coffers
of the federal government. O’Reilly explained that over sixty
percent of those earning under $30,000 per year voted for Obama. Within
that segment, he added, there were enough welfare state beneficiaries
to give Obama the slight margin he needed for re-election. Until that
Entitlement Society is persuaded that its best interests are served
through capitalism rather than socialism, O’Reilly reasoned, it
will be very difficult indeed for Republicans to regain the White House.
The exercise of that power of persuasion, O’Reilly said, requires
“a very special person.” Bill, how about you?
Read more: http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan280.htm
Read more: http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan280.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment