Two
months after the president handily won a second term and the Democrats
increased their numbers in both the House and Senate, GOP congressional
leaders were in no position to negotiate a good “fiscal cliff”
resolution. So it’s not at all surprising that what emerged from the
Biden–McConnell negotiations has satisfied almost no one, and certainly
not many conservatives.
That being said, the January 1 tax deal needs to be put into proper
perspective. The media are fixated on what is being called an Obama
victory: He forced the GOP into retreat on the top income-tax rate. Yes,
that was certainly a win for the president, something that was all but
inevitable after November 6. But, despite what the president (and his
apologists in the media) say, the top individual income-tax rate is not
the sum and substance of the Bush-era tax policy. The benefits of the
tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 went overwhelmingly to the American
middle class, not high-income households, as the tables summarizing the
deal from the Joint Tax Committee and the Congressional Budget Office
have made clear. Compared with what would have happened if the Bush-era
tax schedule had been allowed to expire entirely, the deal is a net
$3.6 trillion ten-year tax cut.Read more: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337025/budget-battles-ahead-james-c-capretta
No comments:
Post a Comment