The late Christopher Hitchens was one of Hillary Clinton’s most
bullish critics. When Clinton was nominated to be secretary of
state, he noted a chasm of
opinion: “It still divides us,” he said on Hardball,
“as between those of us who think that a job must be found for
Hillary Clinton, that the country would be somehow disgraced if she
wasn’t in an important position, and those of us who could do
without her.”
Hitchens’ main concern was that Clinton would use her leverage as secretary of state to benefit foreign friends and cronies. He was vindicated the next year when James Riady, the Indonesian businessman who’d been barred from the United States for illegal contributions to Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, mysteriously obtained a waiver and returned to Arkansas. Say what you will about the Clintons, they don’t waste any time.
Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2013/01/25/hillary-helpers-benghazi
Hitchens’ main concern was that Clinton would use her leverage as secretary of state to benefit foreign friends and cronies. He was vindicated the next year when James Riady, the Indonesian businessman who’d been barred from the United States for illegal contributions to Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, mysteriously obtained a waiver and returned to Arkansas. Say what you will about the Clintons, they don’t waste any time.
Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2013/01/25/hillary-helpers-benghazi
No comments:
Post a Comment