Fill in the blank: 'Jobless claims rise more than _____________.'
Obama's pathetically sad gaffe at Fort Drum
t's easy to get mad at Obama for something like this, but I just feel an enormous amount of sadness for America that we are saddled with this clueless git for another year and a half. And a sadness for the parents of Medal of Honor winner SFC Jared Monti who must have been stung by the president's misstatement. Here's Blackfive reporting on thepresident's appearance at Fort Drum addressing the famous 10th Mountain Division:
"First time I saw 10th Mountain Division, you guys were in southern Iraq. When I went back to visit Afghanistan, you guys were the first ones there. I had the great honor of seeing some of you because a comrade of yours, Jared Monti, was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honor to who actually came back and wasn't receiving it posthumously."
As we all know, SSG Sal Giunta, of the 173rd Airborne, was the first living recipient (2011) of the MOH who fought in Iraq/Afganistan. SFC Jared Monti, 10th Mountain Division, was KIA in Afghanistan in 2006. He was posthumously awarded the MOH by Obama in 2009.
How does the Commander-in-Chief mix these heroes up? He put that medal around Giunta's neck and he stood with Monti's parents as they grieved. These fallen heroes leave such a great legacy, and we should know all their names. The ironic part of the speech, and this comes after the announcement of the politically pressured drawdown of troops in Afghanistan, was Obama's closing remark, "Know that your Commander-in-Chief has your back."
It shouldn't take a teleprompter for the C-in-C to get it right.
No, it shouldn't. Absolutely inexcusable. It might be understandable for a tired man to say there are 57 states but to screw up the names of Medal of Honor winners?
Why Obama is MIA in Deficit Talks
June 28th is a date to watch as the vote on the Greek austerity plan takes place.
Unions are already mobilized and one suspects that a meaningful chunk of that nation will be on strike. It should make for terrific theatre -- especially since the vote is going to be so close.
It is not certain that the austerity plan will even work as it contains a lot of assumptions and has some real problems. The US market is a bit unnerved. Between the Greece Fire, the horrific unemployment numbers coming out this AM, and the Bernanke's speech Wednesday, this makes sense.
Now we are hearing that the Greek finance minister Venizelos is trying to re negotiate and amend the terms of the plan at this late hour. It makes one think that the nation will not be able to hold to the financial covenants built in to the agreement and he knows it. On the other hand, there is the news that some nations in Europe are wanting to refuse any further modifications or concessions. A take it or leave it, Mr. Venizelos, approach.
The euro might take a pounding, that is a given. But there is something else:
Between the irrepressibly poor mathematics, and the dysfunctional psychology and the dynamics of denial, the real lesson here is that this just one possible future that we ourselves may be facing in the next ten years when "other people's money" runs out.
James Hansen, Government Employee, Climate Scientist on the Take
Meet Dr. James Hansen, one of the founders of the religion called Anthropogenic Global Warming, more accurately denominated We're-So-Smart-We-Know-What's-Good-for-You.
Dr. Hansen has been an employee of the federal government for 30 years, at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, where he is now director, making $180,000 per year (plus lavish benefits) courtesy of the US taxpayer. One of his projects is to have the CEOs of large fossil fuel companies put on trial "for high crimes against humanity andnature." Is this a great system or what, where public "servants" get paid, handsomely, to advocate for political policies?
Now we learn that the good doctor has "earned" an additional $1.2 million or more in the past four years from "the very environmental organizations whose agenda he advocated." These fees and prizes are legal for a government employee, if he files the appropriate forms before taking the money. NASA says those forms do not exist.
Where are the left's activists to lecture us on the corrupting influence of money? Are they worried that all these fees, and gifts thinly disguised as "prizes," will affect their hero's objectivity? Isn't the man supposed to be a scientist?
All these "prizes" are just a means of keeping him on the reservation should his slumbering conscience prod him into engaging in real science.
One item is particularly intriguing:
$720,000 in legal advice and media consulting services provided by The George Soros Open Society Institute. Hansen said he did not take "direct" support from Soros but accepted "pro bono legal advice."
Three-quarters of a million dollars from our old friend Georgie for "pro bono legal advice"? Dr. Hansen apparently makes a distinction between direct and indirect bribes. I am reminded of Samuel Pepys, the seventeenth-century English diarist who served as Secretary to the Admiralty. Pepys describes taking envelopes from contractors but refusing to open them in his office. Imagine his delight on going home at night and discovering money inside. No bribery there!
Back to Dr. Hansen. Why the need for so much legal advice? Sure, he has been arrested a couple of times for demonstrating against the coal industry, but those were misdemeanor charges. Has he been charged with a serious felony? Or is he planning one, like urging Congress to steal trillions from the American public through cap and trade and other regulations on energy?
No comments:
Post a Comment