Friday, March 10, 2017

Things to Think About - Political Left Is Not Our Friend 2

Does it surprise you that the mainstream media ignores this action by Trump?  It did not surprise me.  They ignore what they don't want to report.   Where have the pretend oh so concerned progressives been on this deplorable situation?

I am proud of the American College of Pediatricians for its stance against the political left's irresponsible, baseless and unscientific decrees.  Quote: "In other words, manipulators of the education system should not promote sexual confusion at an early age.  Educators should let the boys and girls develop naturally and not seize on adolescent searching by telling the kids that they are mature enough to decide these things.  It is "abusive" to manipulate.  It makes them face "violations of their right to bodily privacy and safety."  The college even has the courage to call it, appropriately, "gender dysphoria."  Any word with the prefix dys- attached to it in today's politically correct culture is bound to attract an onslaught."

The left demands Attorney General Sessions resign because of his suspected ties with Russia.  Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and others have likewise made such demands. Both have ties to Russia.  The point is that the hypocritical left is in the business of calling the kettle black.  For example, why shouldn't the left leaning Washington Post  reveal its relationship to communists?   Quote: "But such disclosures involving one of America’s top newspapers and one of the world’s top repressors, espionage-masters and terror-sponsors do not appear to be forthcoming voluntarily from the Washington Post--or from its Communist-linked correspondent."  BTW, the Post is the newspaper of record charging Sessions with inappropriate contacts with Russia.   The Trump administration turned the table on Schumer.  Quote: “The fact that it’s the last administration that had the most disturbing ties to Russia – that’s what the newspapers should be reporting,” Dr. Sebastian Gorka, a deputy advisor to President Trump, said about the Obama administration."   And, what about this Nancy?    More hypocrisy.   And finally. This what is really going on.   After all of that, get this.  The first so called meeting was simply a public encounter with the Russian ambassador which took place in September at an Obama administration coordinated event of 100 attendees.  The second was in Session's office in September and dealt with Senate Armed Services Committee business.  Democrats and the leftist media are making a politically motivated mountain out of a non-existent molehill.   Had the imbecilic media culprits pushing the matter done their research this fake news item would have ended within 24 hours.  But that is not their way. Their way is to hype anything to cast aspersions at their political enemies whether factual or not.

This item relates to the previous one.  It details another reason why Sessions is under fire.  The Obama administration had a slush fund in the Department of Justice where they funneled taxpayer dollars to radical leftist groups.  Quote: "While Sessions stands in the media and political cross-hairs, the Obama Justice Department is under fire for operating a slush fund to give a boost to liberal activist groups. Instead of sending money won through legal cases to the U.S. Treasury, the Justice Department sent billions to activist groups, including the National Council of La Raza, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the National Urban League. Von Spakovsky and co-author John Fund exposed the slush fund in their book “Obama’s Enforcer,” which details the legacy of former Attorney General Eric Holder. Von Spakovsky said this activity is unique to the Obama Justice Department. “This has been an open secret in Washington for years, but nothing has been done about it,” he said. “I would hope the new attorney general would this down and, frankly, go in and try to get these funds back if that can possibly happen.”

Now, take a look at this item.  Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, to make AG Sessions look like a criminal, claimed this. "I've been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years. No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel Com."  Shortly after she issued that declarative statement, she was proven to be a liar.  Ask yourself if Senator :Schumer will demand she resign.  Not!  Democrats unfortunately fall into the hypocritical trap way, way too often to demand anyone on  their side of the aisle resign for trivial reasons.  If that were to happen few Democrats would be left on their terribly weak bench because such behavior is a matter of routine for them.   Remember, not too long ago Democrats fiercely defended a mountain of lies out of the mouths of both President Obama and presidential candidate Hillary.  Now, that is an example of hypocrisy in spades.  

Here is more Democrat hypocrisy.  Nancy Pelosi "demands" Republicans let her "... see details of ObamaCare replacement before it passes."   Best I remember this dingbat is the one who told America that "We must pass the Affordable Care Act so we can see what's in it."  Her hypocritical demands fall on deaf ears.  Remember too, then Majority Leader of the Senate, Democrat Harry Reid, refused to allow a single Republican proposed amendment to Obamacare see the light of day.  He then later proclaimed that Republicans had not offered a single idea for the bill.  He was a notorious tyrannical Senate Majority leader who repeatedly lied about all manner of things.  Remember too that not a single Republican voted for the Democrat's healthcare disaster.  Would you in good conscience allow these Democrats to demagogue a plan put forth by Republican after the way the Democrats treated them?   Here is Nancy levying her demand.     I wonder why Schumer has not already demanded Pelosi's resignation.   Do you think that might be an example of rank hypocrisy???  How about this one?    It should be obvious by now that I am not a fan of the majority of Democrats and their awful behavior as legislators, especially the Democrat leadership. 

Nor am I a fan of the entire ranks of the political left.  This is just one of many more reasons why.  Leftist feminists have come up with a brand new concept that proves they do not have all their marbles.  This new concept is called "Birth Rape".  Here is how they describe it: "A vulnerable woman, who is powerless to leave the situation, is at times held down against her will, has strangers looking & touching at private parts of her body, perhaps without appropriate measures being taken to acknowledge her ownership of her body or to preserve her comfort levels. Perhaps she has fingers or instruments inserted without her consent, and sometimes against her consent, invading and crossing decent boundaries. She is fearful of what is happening to her and perhaps for the wellbeing of her baby, and receives no reassurance that either she or her child are ok. That is a violation, no matter how you look at it. Even IF this treatment is given with no malice and the intent of attempting to assist her with birthing her child, there is NEVER a reason to forgo common decencies that will enable her to maintain a role in the birth, some autonomy over her body, to be involved in the decision-making, to be informed about what they want to do BEFORE they do it."   What do you think?  And, what do you suppose the punishment should be for people attempting to assist a mother giving birth?   Rational thought is not an attribute frequently found in members of the political left. 

Both Democrats Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Keith Ellison fall into the category of the less than desirables as well.  Both sat during a critical portion of Trump's State of the Union.  Schultz calls it fake news even though video shots prove the point.  Could you say this is anything other than the words of a lying hypocrite?  To make matters worse she went on national TV and said this: "... it was all fake news, and that that’s the ‘M.O.’ of conservatives and the White House."   No wonder she was fired as Chairman of the Democrat National Committee.  She is a complete idiot.  Her implication in the TV quip was that she and Ellison are the victims of hateful conservative and White House lies.  The lies belong completely with these hypocritical leftists.

Guess what.  The leftist mainstream media falls into the same disgusting bucket as the rest of the majority of those on the political left.  If you think their reporting is fair and balanced, check this out. Quote: "A mere 3 percent of reports about President Donald Trump that aired on NBC and CBS nightly news were positive, according to analysis by the nonpartisan press research firm Media Tenor.  The report found 43 percent of stories on NBC and CBS about Trump were negative, while another 54 percent of reports were considered neutral."

No comments: