Friday, March 31, 2017

Things To Reflect Upon 3

This may not be entirely true but their behavior suggests it could well be true.  Quote: "Montgomery County, Md., is one of the richest counties in the country. It’s also an extremely left-wing progressive county that prides itself on being “welcoming,” which is liberal code for a sanctuary county. The sanctuary status is not official, according to county leaders. They pretend they aren’t fully on board with sanctuary policies because they don’t want to lose federal money, but they are.  That unofficial status pushed the city of Rockville to out-liberal its county and push to put their sanctuary status on the books, taking steps in that direction just two weeks ago.  A new horrific crime may put that dream on hold.  Last Thursday, a 14-year-old student Rockville High School allegedly was forced into the boys’ bathroom and violently raped by two of her fellow freshman students. Those student were not typical students, they were grown men – ages 17 and 18.  Why were two men old enough to join the military in the 9th grade? Because they were assigned freshman status by the “welcoming” schools, no questions asked.  At least one of the men, 18-year-old Henry Sanchez, is in the country illegally. As for the other, 17-year-old Jose Montano, officials won’t comment on his status because he’s underage."

This senator has no business serving in her elected office.  As a hard core partisan she does not understand that presidential appointees work for the current president, not the former president.  Quote: "The Massachusetts senator, a champion of the Democrat's liberal base, prodded Acosta to take a public stance against President Trump. The nominee did not bite, saying he would not weigh in on such manners because the president sets policy. The back and forth led Warren to accuse him of dodging "every one of my questions" and hiding "behind an executive order."  "I haven't spoken to individuals at the Department of Labor [about the policies] because I have not been confirmed," Acosta said.  "If you cant give me straight answers on your views on this … and commit to stand behind workers then I don’t have any confidence you're the right person for this job," Warren said." 

It is a good deed if you give money to a panhandler addicted to alcohol?  Quote: "Let's get the obvious out of the way: The pope is a good man. His heart is in the right place. He cares about the less fortunate among us. And so should we all.  But isn't this the same old paternalism liberals are famous for? Isn't this the same kind of thinking that created and perpetuated the welfare state here in America -- the same kind of compassion that in too many cases left generation after generation no better off than when the supposed compassion started?  Liberals may genuinely think they're helping, but they're not the ones paying the price for their compassion."

One really does have to wonder who the mainstream media is looking after.  They issue item after item of how bad repealing Obamacare will be.  Never mind the facts.  Quote: "Tennessee's insurance commissioner has warned that ACA exchanges are "very near collapse," as providers have bailed out of the state. Two of the 10 Obamacare "victims" invited to the White House hail from Tennessee. Trump's "victims" resemble many Americans who resent Obamacare. They work hard and are successful so they often don't qualify for federal subsidies. They are paying higher premiums for policies with higher deductibles and limited access to once beloved doctors. Many voted for Obama, in part because they believed his promise, that if they liked their doctor, they could keep their doctor.  Wrong. The fact-checking organization PolitiFact rated, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it" as its 2013 Lie of the Year. 

What a difference.  The "oh so concerned" Democrats did nothing to address this problem for three years.  Trump takes action within two months.  Speaking of  those concerned Democrats, James Woods, one of the honest good guys in Hollywood, reveals in this note what they have done.  He hits the mark.

Far too many give the government the benefit of doubt.  That is a serious mistake.  This is just one of many examples why.  Our government engages in legalized theft under the guise of civil asset forfeiture.  Quote: "In jolly old England, Robin Hood stole from the rich to give to the poor.  In modern-day America, greedy government goons steal from the innocent to give to the corrupt under court- and legislature-sanctioned schemes called civil asset forfeiture. In fact, according to The Washington Post, “law enforcement took more stuff from people than burglars did.”  This is how the American police state continues to get rich: by stealing from the citizenry.  Here’s how the whole ugly business works in a nutshell.  First, government agents (usually the police) use a broad array of tactics to profile, identify, target and arrange to encounter (in a traffic stop, on a train, in an airport, in public, or on private property) those  individuals who might be traveling with a significant amount of cash or possess property of value. Second, these government agents—empowered by the courts and the legislatures—seize private property (cash, jewelry, cars, homes and other valuables) they “suspect” may be connected to criminal activity.  Then—and here’s the kicker—whether or not any crime is actually proven to have taken place, without any charges being levied against the property owner, or any real due process afforded the unlucky victim, the property is forfeited to the government, which often divvies it up with the local police who helped with the initial seizure.

This type of information is hard to stomach.  Quote: "Nancy Pelosi, one of the most vile corrupt Democrats in the party, actually said: “The Republican bill is one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country — Robin Hood in reverse.”  Nancy Pelosi always bashes the “rich” when in fact she is constantly involved in money schemes and scandals with her husband. The scandals with Pelosi over money have been numerous. Her and her husband just walk on water and fill their pockets, for there is never enough for them. They have become notorious in real estate deals and install people in high places to get personal gains. They have been involved in insider trading in stock deals. She has steered projects in which she had a personal undisclosed interest. Her greed and scandals are endless, and many people in California want to secede from the United States because of Trump, yet they keep sending corrupt people to Washington like Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein. Even some of the delusional people in Silicon Valley urged to secede after Trump won.  Pelosi may be one of the most corrupt politicians in the Democrats after the Clintons. Her comment that the Republicans are proposing “one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country” is just amazingly so dishonest. The very design of everything the Democrats have set up has been based upon a transfer of wealth from one generation to another. The structural design of Obamacare is another Ponzi Scheme."

The left's insistence that illegal immigrants deserve our protection is grossly misguided.  What is that that gives them the right to ignore the meaning of the word "illegal"?  They broke the law.  If we citizens break the law who is there to protect us?  Even worse far too many illegal immigrants break other laws needlessly inflicting harm on people, property, taxpayer and judicial resources.  The point is if they were not here, such harm would not exist.  This is just one of hundreds of examples.
Normal average people of all races and ethnicities should be disturbed by the implications of this piece.  Quote: "As a Caucasian, I am told there is ‘white racism’, ‘white privilege’, and ‘toxic whiteness’ by the Cultural Marxists. Because I am wedded to my skin, I cannot free myself from these at will. My inherent racial sin will follow me for life. But I discovered there are some people who are sometimes ‘white’, and sometimes ‘not-white’. How curious. I have noted that their self-designation changes at will, depending on circumstance. This seems duplicitous and deceitful to me. In Marxism, you are always a victim or oppressor – or so I thought.  Are whites being played for fools here?"

After you read this you will understand the claim that the IRS and its political leftist orientation is anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-conservative.  They delay/ignore actions and/or punish organizations they don't like and speed things through for those they do like.  At least that was the case while Obama was in charge.  We will have to see if their attitude changes with a new boss in town.

George Burns

No comments: